UAE court orders B.R. Shetty to pay $45.99 million to SBI after finding he lied under oath
_vb_24.jpeg)
Dubai: The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts has ordered B.R. Shetty, founder of the now-collapsed NMC Healthcare Group, to pay $45.99 million (Dh168.7 million) to the State Bank of India (DIFC Branch) after finding that he lied under oath about signing a personal guarantee for a $50 million (Dh183.5 million) loan.
In a judgment issued on October 8, Justice Andrew Moran described Shetty’s testimony as “an incredible parade of lies” and called his evidence during the September 29 hearing “incoherent and nonsensical.” The court said there was “overwhelming witness and documentary evidence” proving that Shetty personally signed the guarantee in December 2018, making him liable for the debt.
Under the ruling, Shetty must pay $45,997,554.59 (Dh168.8 million), including interest up to the judgment date, with post-judgment interest set at 9 per cent per year, accruing at roughly $11,341 (Dh41,645) per day until full repayment.
The case centred on whether Shetty had personally guaranteed a $50 million loan extended by State Bank of India (SBI) to NMC Healthcare in December 2018. Shetty denied signing any documents or meeting the bank’s CEO, claiming his signature was forged.
However, the court was presented with photographs, meeting notes, and emails from Shetty’s own account contradicting his version.
The bank’s then-CEO, Anantha Shenoy, testified that he travelled to NMC’s Abu Dhabi office on December 25, 2018, where Shetty signed the guarantee in his presence. Shenoy also produced photographs taken weeks later showing Shetty with senior SBI officials, apparently thanking them for the facility. When shown the photos, Shetty claimed the officials must have “just come and stood there” while he posed for pictures with the chairman.
The court dismissed these claims as “false and discreditable manoeuvring designed to evade liability.”
Justice Moran also rejected Shetty’s claim that NMC employees once held a competition to see who could best forge his signature, calling the explanation “bizarre.”
Handwriting experts testified that the signatures on the guarantee, sanction letter, and related documents matched Shetty’s handwriting. The judge said the evidence against him was overwhelming.
The ruling marks another blow to the 83-year-old Indian billionaire, once hailed as one of the UAE’s most successful Indian entrepreneurs. Shetty founded NMC Healthcare in the mid-1970s, building it into the UAE’s largest private healthcare provider, alongside other ventures such as UAE Exchange and Finablr.
At its peak, NMC was listed on the London Stock Exchange and valued at more than $10 billion (Dh36.7 billion). But the company collapsed in 2020 after hidden debts of over $4 billion (Dh14.68 billion) were discovered, triggering international investigations.
Shetty resigned as joint non-executive chairman of NMC in February 2020. The company was later placed under administration in Abu Dhabi, while Shetty left the UAE and returned to India, citing health reasons.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
India proposes preferential trade agreement with Mexico to deal with high tariffs
New Delhi (PTI): India has proposed a preferential trade agreement (PTA) with Mexico to help domestic exporters deal with the steep tariffs announced by the South American country, a top government official said on Monday.
Mexico has decided to impose steep import tariffs - ranging from about 5 per cent to as high as 50 per cent on a wide range of goods (about 1,463 tariff lines) from countries that do not have free trade agreements with Mexico, including India, China, South Korea, Thailand and Indonesia.
Commerce Secretary Rajesh Agrawal said that India has engaged with the country on the issue.
"Technical level talks are on...The only fast way forward is to try to get a preferential trade agreement (PTA) because an FTA (free trade agreement) will take a lot of time. So we are trying to see what can be a good way forward," he told reporters here.
While in an FTA two trading partners either significantly reduce or eliminate import duties on maximum number of goods traded between them, in a PTA, duties are cut or removed on a limited number of products.
Trading partners of Mexico cannot file a compliant against the decision on imposing high tariffs as they are WTO (World Trade Organisation) compatible.
The duties are within their bound rates, he said, adding that their primary target was not India.
"We have proposed a PTA because its a WTO-compatible way forward... we can do a PTA and try to get concessions that are required for Indian supply chains and similarly offer them concessions where they have export interests in India," Agrawal said.
ALSO READ: Mexico's Congress approves higher tariffs on goods from India, China and non-FTA nations
Citing support for local production and correction of trade imbalances, Mexico has approved an increase in MFN (most favoured nation) import tariffs (5-50 per cent) with effect from January 1, 2026 on 1,455 tariff lines (or product categories) within the WTO framework, targeting non-FTA partners.
Preliminary estimates suggest that this affects India's around USD 2 billion exports to Mexico particularly -- automobile, two-wheelers, auto parts, textiles, iron and steel, plastics, leather and footwear.
The measure is also aimed at curbing Chinese imports.
India-Mexico merchandise trade totalled USD 8.74 billion in 2024, with exports USD 5.73 billion, imports USD 3.01 billion, and a trade surplus of USD 2.72 billion.
The government has been continuously and comprehensively assessing Mexico's tariff revisions since the issue emerged, engaging stakeholders, safeguarding the interests of Indian exporters, and pursuing constructive dialogue to ensure a stable trade environment benefiting businesses and consumers in both countries.
ALSO READ: Search operation ends in Anjaw truck accident, 20 bodies recovered
Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO) Director General Ajay Sahai has said that Mexico's decision is a matter of concern, particularly for sectors like automobiles and auto components, machinery, electrical and electronics, organic chemicals, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and plastics.
"Such steep duties will erode our competitiveness and risk, disrupting supply chains that have taken years to develop," Sahai said, adding that this development also underlines the little urgency for India and Mexico to fast-track a comprehensive trade agreement.
Domestic auto component manufacturers will face enhanced cost pressures with Mexico hiking duties on Indian imports, according to industry body ACMA.
