Why every dispute between Delhi Govt & LG should come to apex court, asks SC, tells DCPCR to move HC
DCPCR approached Supreme Court over alleged freezing of its funds
New Delhi, Dec 15: Why should "every dispute" between the Delhi government and the Lieutenant Governor (LG) land in the apex court, the Supreme Court observed on Friday and asked the Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) to approach the high court with its grievance.
The DCPCR had approached the Supreme Court over alleged freezing of its funds.
"What is happening is, every dispute, all and sundry, between the Government of the NCT of Delhi and the Lieutenant Governor is coming here as a (Article) 226 petition," a bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud said.
Article 226 of the Constitution deals with power of the high courts to issue certain writs.
The bench, also comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, observed on Thursday, it dealt with a plea by Delhi government challenging LG V K Saxena's decision to terminate the services of all civil defence volunteers working as marshals in DTC buses.
"Go to the Delhi High Court. Why should we entertain a petition under (Article) 32 here," the bench told senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the DCPCR.
Sankaranarayanan said the plea filed by the commission was a little different from other disputes between the Delhi government and the LG which have landed before the apex court so far.
"This is a commission and the commission's money has been frozen," he said.
The CJI told him that the apex court has entertained pleas dealing with broader constitutional issues.
"Now go to the high court," Justice Chandrachud said.
Sankaranarayanan, while putting forth his argument, said the funds of the commission cannot be frozen. "How can six million children of the state be told that not a penny is going to come to the commission," he said.
"That is why high courts are there," the bench told him and asked "Why are you bucking the Delhi High Court?"
"Everything between the Delhi government and the Lieutenant Governor is coming here every two days. Bus marshal scheme was discontinued and we got a petition under (Article) 32," the CJI said.
Sankaranarayanan said the DCPCR is an independent commission and the tenure of its members have come to an end. He said at present, the commission was not in a position to approach the high court afresh.
"Considering the nature of the grievance which is being addressed before this court by the DCPCR, we are of the considered view that a petition under Article 226 would be the appropriate remedy," the bench observed.
Referring to Sankaranarayanan's submission about the end of the tenure of the members of the commission, the bench directed the apex court registry to transfer these proceedings to the Delhi High Court.
While disposing of the petition, it said the plea shall be re-numbered as a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Tribal man brings dead sister's skeleton to bank to withdraw money from her account
Keonjhar (PTI): A tribal man in Odisha's Keonjhar district on Monday brought the skeleton of his dead sister to a bank to withdraw the money deposited in her name, police said.
The incident occurred at Maliposi branch of Odisha Grameen Bank located at Patana block of Keonjhar district. The man was identified as Jeetu Munda (50) of Dianali village. He was seeking to withdraw Rs 20,000 from the bank account of his elder sister, Kalra Munda (56), who died on January 26, 2026.
"I have run several times to the bank, and the people there told me to bring the account holder to withdraw money deposited in her name. Though I told them that she had died, they did not listen to me and insisted on bringing her to the bank. Therefore, out of frustration, I dug the grave and brought out her skeleton as proof of her death," an illiterate Jeetu Munda told reporters.
Patana Police Station Inspector in charge (IIC) Kiran Prasad Sahu, who reached the bank after getting information, said, "Jeetu is an illiterate tribal man. He does not know what the legal heir or nominee is. The bank officials have failed to make him understand the procedure to withdraw money from the dead person's account."
However, after the incident, the police assured Jeetu Munda that they would facilitate the withdrawal of money from the bank account of his dead sister. Later, the skeleton was again buried at the graveyard in presence of police.
Meanwhile, local Block Development Officer (BDO) Manas Dandpat said that he was not approached by anyone for the legal heir of late Kalra Munda. "Today only, I came to know about it. We will see what can be done to resolve the issue," the BDO said.
Meanwhile, bank sources said that the nominee in Kalra Munda's bank account was also dead. Therefore, Jeetu Munda was the lone claimant over the money deposited in her name.
The local administration has directed the bank officers to make arrangements and ensure that Jeetu Munda, who is the only claimant as per the rules, gets the money as soon as possible.
