You come with fanciful ideas when nation facing difficult time: SC on Rohingya deportation
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Friday rapped the petitioners who claimed 43 Rohingya refugees including women and children were dropped in the Andaman sea for deportation to Myanmar and said "when country is passing through a difficult time, you come out with fanciful ideas".
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh also questioned the authenticity of materials placed before it by petitioner Mohd Ismail and others and refused to stay any further deportation of Rohingyas saying similar relief was denied by the court.
"When the country is passing through a difficult time, you come out with such fanciful ideas," the bench told senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for the petitioners.
It said the materials placed by petitioners appeared to be taken from social media and termed the averments of torture and deportation of Rohingyas by throwing them into sea as "mere allegations".
"Where is the material substantiating the allegations?" Justice Kant asked.
The bench said recording of the alleged phone call conversation between those who were deported and the Delhi-based petitioner was not verified.
"Did anyone verify these phone calls that they originated from Myanmar? Earlier, we heard a case where calls were made from Jamtara in Jharkhand from phone numbers of US, UK and Canada," Justice Kant scoffed.
When Gonsalves tried to refer to the report of the United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner saying it had also taken note of the issue and started an inquiry into the matter, the bench said, "People sitting outside cannot dictate our authorities and sovereignty."
The bench, however, asked Gonsalves to serve the copy of the petition to the office of the attorney general and the solicitor general for the purpose of transmitting it to the authorities concerned in the government and posted the hearing before a three-judge bench on July 31.
"There is absolutely no material in support of the vague, evasive and sweeping statements made. Unless the allegations are supported with some prima facie material, it is difficult for us to sit over an order passed by a larger bench," it said.
The top court termed the averments made in the petition as "beautifully crafted story using flowery language" and said it would comment on the report of the UN body while sitting in a combination of three-judge bench.
Gonsalves was further asked, "Every day you come with a new story. What is the basis of this story? Where is the material to substantiate your allegations?"
He alleged that after the last hearing on May 8, several Rohingyas were deported after being taken to Andaman and they were dropped in the sea. He said they are now put in a "war zone" facing the risk of getting killed.
He said they have got a phone call from one of them, which has been recorded and put on record.
On May 8, the top court said if Rohingya refugees in the country were found to be foreigners under Indian laws they would have to be deported.
The court then referred to its order and remarked the identity cards issued by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) may not be of any help to them under the law.
The top court was informed that some refugees having UNHCR cards, including women and children, were arrested by police authorities late last night and deported, despite a hearing on May 15.
"If they (Rohingyas) are all foreigners and if they are covered by the Foreigners' Act, then they will have to be dealt with as per the Foreigners' Act," it said.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, referred to the April 8, 2021 order of the court and said it bound the government to take deportation action in accordance with law.
Referring to the UNHCR cards, Mehta said India was not a signatory to the refugee convention.
The April 2021 order said the rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 are available to all persons who may or may not be citizens but the right of not to be deported, is ancillary or concomitant to the right to reside or settle in any part of the territory of India guaranteed under Article 19(1)(e).
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
BJP's Siroya seeks probe into ex-minister's claim of vote purchase to help Siddaramaiah win in polls
Bengaluru (PTI): BJP Rajya Sabha member Lahar Singh Siroya has urged the Election Commission to take note of former Union Minister C M Ibrahim's reported remarks on the alleged purchase of votes during the 2018 Karnataka Assembly elections to help Siddaramaiah win from Badami segment.
In a letter to the ECI on Tuesday, the Rajya Sabha member said Ibrahim, who was Siddaramaiah's close associate and advisor for decades, has said that he, along with senior Congress leader B B Chimankatti, helped purchase 3,000 votes in 2018, so that Siddaramaiah could scrape through the assembly election from the Badami seat.
Siddaramaiah has reportedly denied Ibrahim's charges.
In a post on 'X', Siroya said, "In the final count, Shri Siddaramaiah's victory margin in Badami was a mere 1696 votes. It was a humiliating margin for a sitting chief minister. The NOTA votes, which were 2007, were higher than his victory margin."
Siroya said Ibrahim, who was a "prominent Congress leader in 2018 and by all references and claims, was in charge of his friend's election," must explain the source and method of the alleged vote purchase.
"Ibrahim will do us a great favour if he tells us how, and from whom, he purchased the 3,000 votes to save his friend. He has also said Shri. Siddaramaiah had paid for this purchase, but took six months to make the payment.
The #ECI may want to take note of this claim of gross electoral corruption from someone who has been a lawmaker and a union minister himself, and order an investigation."
Siroya recalled that Siddaramaiah had defeated BJP candidate B Sriramulu in Badami.
"Perhaps Sriramulu also has some information and insight on how the 3000 votes were purchased. If he speaks, we'll know more on what happened in 2018 when he had contested from two seats, and would have practically won both the seats if this vote purchase had not happened," he said.
Siroya also raised questions about Siddaramaiah's narrow victory in the 2006 Chamundeshwari by-election.
"Now that Ibrahim has spoken about Siddaramaiah's narrow victory in Badami in 2018, he should also open up on the 2006 by-election of Siddaramaiah from the Chamundeshwari assembly constituency. Then too he was his close friend and strategist," he pointed out.
Siroya further said that in 2006, Siddaramaiah fought his first election, after he joined the Congress and his victory margin was only 257 votes.
"Were votes purchased even then? Congress was in power in Delhi. Did they manage a victory for Siddaramaiah then? Who were the officers who conducted that election?" he asked.
Hitting out at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Siroya said: "Anyway, @RahulGandhi, by coming to Bengaluru a few days back, and making wild allegations about electoral rolls, has opened up a can of worms. His party men, including his CM, are more affected than anybody else. We should thank Rahul Gandhi for coming to Bengaluru because what he has ultimately done is destabilise his own government."
The MP said that Rahul is known for his self-goals and this will count as a big one.
"Co-operation Minister KN Rajanna's un-democratic sacking because he contradicted Shri. Rahul Gandhi is the beginning of the Congress' fall in Karnataka," he stated.
K N Rajanna was sacked as Cooperation Minister on Monday for blaming the Congress government for the bogus voting in the 2024 Lok Sabha election.
