77th Independence Day celebrated at Bearys Knowledge Campus
Mangaluru: (Press Release) The Bearys Knowledge Campus at Inoli here resonated with enthusiasm and patriotism during the vibrant celebration of the 77th Independence Day. The event, held on August 15th, commenced at 09:00 am with the unfurling of the national tricolor by the Chief Guest, Dr. Monika Sadananda, a distinguished Professor and Chairperson Biosciences of Mangalore University.
Dr. Monika Sadananda, was joined by Dr. Manjur Basha S I, the Principal of BIT, Architect Khaleel, the Principal of BEADS, and Prof. Pruthviraj, Director of BIT-Polytechnic on this special occasion.
Addressing the assembly, Dr. Manjur Basha S I, the Principal of BIT, delivered a stirring discourse on the pivotal role of students in the contemporary landscape of national development. He paid homage to the father of the nation and the sacrifices of countless freedom fighters that paved the path to our cherished independence.
In her address, Dr. Monika Sadananda emphasized the collective duty of citizens in an independent nation. She underscored the imperative of dedicating ourselves to the service of our country and actively participating in transforming Bearys Knowledge Campus into a hub of national service. Her speech resonated with the spirit of responsibility and commitment to the nation's progress.
The event reached its end with the harmonious strains of the National Anthem, symbolizing collective pride and unity. Students and staff alike wholeheartedly participated, reflecting the vibrant spirit of the campus community. A substantial gathering convened to commemorate this momentous occasion, highlighting the unwavering commitment to the nation's ideals.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Judiciary not here to perform Opposition’s role: Former CJI DY Chandrachud
New Delhi: Former Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, in an exclusive interview with ANI, addressed recent remarks made by Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, who stated that the Opposition has taken it upon themselves to "do the task of the judiciary." Responding to this, Chandrachud clarified that the judiciary's role is to scrutinise laws and ensure they are consistent with the Constitution, not to serve as an opposition force.
"People should not presume that the judiciary should perform the role of the opposition in Parliament or state legislatures. Too often, there's a misconception that the judiciary must act as an opposition. We are here to scrutinise laws and assess executive action for its consistency with the law and the Constitution," said the former CJI.
He further emphasised that in a democracy, there is a distinct space for political opposition and that using the judiciary to fulfil such a role undermines its primary function. "What people try to do is use the judiciary to shoot from its shoulders and convert the Court into a space for political opposition," Chandrachud remarked.
Rahul Gandhi had earlier commented, "We are alone working on behalf of the media, investigative agencies, and judiciary also. This is the reality of India."
When questioned about interactions with leaders from both the Opposition and the ruling party, Chandrachud explained that social interactions are natural during official meetings, such as those required for appointments. "After official discussions, spending a few minutes socialising over tea is normal. We are human beings after all," he said, adding that such moments do not compromise judicial independence.
Regarding the controversy surrounding Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to his residence during Ganpati Puja, Chandrachud called it a social courtesy. "Such visits are not unique. Prime Ministers have visited judges’ homes on social occasions or even during times of personal loss. These courtesies do not affect the independence of our work," he said.
In September, PM Modi’s visit to Chandrachud’s residence for Ganpati Puja drew criticism from Opposition parties, including Congress and Trinamool Congress, over potential conflict of interest. However, Chandrachud maintained that these interactions are part of elementary social courtesy and do not impact the judiciary's independence.
