Billava candidates more important than party affiliations for us: Shri Narayana Guru Forum president
Sathyajith Surathkal, the State President of the Shri Narayana Guru Vichara Vedike (SNGV), announced that the forum has decided to prioritize the candidate over the party affiliation and will extend support to Billava candidates in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections across several constituencies, irrespective of their party affiliations. This decision was made public during a press conference held at the Press Club in Mangaluru on Monday.
Surathkal highlighted the significance of the decision, stating that the 'Narayana Guru Samaja,' comprising 26 communities including Billavas, Eedigas, and Namdharis, has long sought representation in electoral politics. He emphasized the presence of a substantial Billava voter base, totaling 12 lakh voters, across Dakshina Kannada, Udupi, Uttara Kannada, and Shivamogga districts. Surathkal pointed out that despite this demographic strength, the BJP had not fielded a Billava candidate for over three decades. However, this year, Kota Srinivas Poojary has been nominated as the BJP candidate from the Udupi-Chikmagalur constituency after a hiatus of 33 years.
Regarding the Congress, Surathkal noted that the party had selected a Bunt candidate for the Dakshina Kannada constituency following the unsuccessful Lok Sabha campaigns of veteran leader B Janardhana Poojary.
Surathkal also outlined the efforts of the SNGV in advocating for the advancement of various backward communities, including their advocacy for representation in development boards, the inclusion of Narayana Guru's teachings in textbooks, and the renaming of airports in Mangaluru and Shivamogga.
The SNGV announced its support for Padmaraj R of the Congress in Dakshina Kannada, Kota Srinivas Poojary of the BJP in Udupi-Chikmagalur, and Geetha Shivaraj Kumar, the Congress candidate, in Shimoga. Surathkal assured personal involvement in campaigning for these candidates, expressing hope that their victory would lead to improved educational and economic conditions for the community members.
Responding to queries about his own candidacy, Surathkal lamented the lack of opportunity given to him by the BJP, attributing it to his caste and economic background. He criticized the party's preference for candidates who unquestioningly follow directives from party leaders, asserting his commitment to individuals who uphold self-dignity.
While Surathkal acknowledged the nomination of Kota Srinivas Poojary as a positive step, he maintained that there is room for debate on whether the selection truly represents the interests of the Billava community. He suggested alternative candidates who he believed could have been considered for the nomination based on their past performance in public service roles.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Pressure groups trying to use social media to affect outcome of cases: Ex CJI Chandrachud
New Delhi, Nov 24: Former Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud on Sunday said social media is being used by special interest groups to influence outcome of cases and judges need to be wary of them.
He also noted that people nowadays want to form an opinion on the basis of 20 seconds they see on YouTube or any other social media platform, saying it poses a great danger.
"Today there are special interest groups, pressure groups who are trying to use social media to affect the minds of the courts and the outcomes of cases. Every citizen is entitled to understand what is the basis of a decision and to express their opinions on the decisions of the court. But when this goes beyond the decisions of the court and targets individual judges, then it sort of raises fundamental questions about - Is this truly freedom of speech and expression?" he said.
"Everybody, therefore wants to form an opinion in 20 seconds of what they see on YouTube or any social media platform. This poses a grave danger because the process of decision-making in the courts is far more serious. It is really nuanced that nobody has the patience or the tolerance today on social media to understand, and that is a very serious issue that is confronting the Indian judiciary," he said while speaking at NDTV India's Samvidhan@75 Conclave.
"Judges have to be very careful about the fact that they are constantly being subject to this barrage of special interest groups trying to alter the decisions of what happens in the courts," he said while replying to a question on whether trolling on social media impacts judges.
Chandrachud also said that in a democracy the power to decide the validity of laws is entrusted to the constitutional courts.
"Separation of powers postulates that law-making will be carried out by the legislature, execution of law will be carried out by the executive and the judiciary will interpret the law and decide the disputes. There are times when this comes under strain. Policy making is entrusted to the government in a democracy.
"When fundamental rights are involved, courts are duty bound under the Constitution to step in. Policy making is the job of the legislature, but deciding on its validity is the job and responsibility of the courts," Chandrachud said.
Defending the collegium system, the 50th CJI said there is a lot of misunderstanding about the process and it very nuanced and multi-layered.
"It's not as if the judiciary has exclusive role to play in appointment of judges," he said adding that first thing to be considered in seniority of judges.
When asked, if judges should enter politics, the former CJI said there is no bar in Constitution or in law to do so.
"Society continues to look at you as a judge even after retirement, therefore, things which are alright for other citizens to do would not be alright for judges to do even when they demit office.
"Primarily it is for every judge to take a call on whether a decision which he takes after retirement will have a bearing on people who assess the work which he did as a judge," he said.
Chandrachud retired on November 10 after a stint of two years as CJI.
