'Coalition Shawl' for JD(S) candidate from Udupi-Chikmagalur constituency Pramod Madhwaraj
Udupi: JD(S) candidate from Udupi-Chikmagalur constituency Pramod Madhwaraj on Friday arrived in Udupi wearing a shawl displaying symbols of both Congress and JD(S) here.
Pramod during the event said “I was aspiring for Congress ticket, but the coalition decision changed things around and I am contesting from JD(S) ticket with the support of Congress”.
Pramod who arrived in Udupi on Friday after being declared the candidate from both the parties was welcomed by party leaders and workers.
Speaking to reporters at the Congress Bhavan he said “I chose to contest from JD(S) ticket in the interest of Congress party, I am visiting Congress office before even going to home. I will file nomination on March 25. I will tour both the districts in two days”.
Responding to the question pertaining to the shawl he was wearing he said that he was the first politician to wear such a Shawl with symbols of two parties and that no such shawl was ever produced before.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Broken relationships don't automatically amount to abetment of suicide: SC
New Delhi (PTI): Broken relationships, while emotionally distressing, do not automatically amount to abetment of suicide in the absence of intention leading to the criminal offence, the Supreme Court on Friday said.
The observations came from a bench of Justices Pankaj Mithal and Ujjal Bhuyan in a judgement, which overturned the conviction of one Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi by the Karnataka High Court for the offences of cheating and abetment of suicide under the IPC.
"This is a case of a broken relationship, not criminal conduct," the judgment said.
Sanadi was initially charged under Sections 417 (cheating), 306 (abetment of suicide), and 376 (rape) of the IPC.
While the trial court acquitted him of all the charges, the Karnataka High Court, on the state's appeal, convicted him of cheating and abetment of suicide, sentencing him to five years imprisonment and imposing Rs 25,000 in fine.
According to the FIR registered at the mother's instance, her 21-year-old daughter was in love with the accused for the past eight years and died by suicide in August, 2007, after he refused to keep his promise to marry.
Writing a 17-page judgement, Justice Mithal analysed the two dying declarations of the woman and noted that neither was there any allegation of a physical relationship between the couple nor there was any intentional act leading to the suicide.
The judgement therefore underlined broken relationships were emotionally distressing, but did not automatically amount to criminal offences.
"Even in cases where the victim dies by suicide, which may be as a result of cruelty meted out to her, the courts have always held that discord and differences in domestic life are quite common in society and that the commission of such an offence largely depends upon the mental state of the victim," said the apex court.
The court further said, "Surely, until and unless some guilty intention on the part of the accused is established, it is ordinarily not possible to convict him for an offence under Section 306 IPC.”
The judgement said there was no evidence to suggest that the man instigated or provoked the woman to die by suicide and underscored a mere refusal to marry, even after a long relationship, did not constitute abetment.
