Crude bomb explosion in Puttur: Accused arrested
Puttur, October 27: Local police arrested an accused in Kerala on charges of attempting to demolish a house by blasting a crude bomb.
On October 15 night, accused Babu alias Balan has conspired to blast the house of Narayana Prasad at Polya in Kabaka village. Under the direction of SP Dr Ravikanthe Gowda and guidance of Puttur CPI Thimmappa Nayak, SI Ajay and Puttur city police have arrested the accused in Kerala after 11 days of operation.
It is said that the accused is hailed from Ernakulam in Kerala. He has allegedly exploded crude bomb in front of the house of Narayana Prasad, whose wife sustained injuries in the incident and admitted to a hospital. Out of three crude bombs, one bomb was exploded and remaining two were recovered. After the incident, the SP has constituted three teams to arrest the accused. Among three teams, one team led by SI Ajay camped in Kerala from October 16 and arrested the accused.
The accused was produced before the court which remanded him to police custody for five days for interrogation.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
MUDA case: Court reserves verdict in ED's petition challenging Lokayukta 'B' report
Bengaluru: The Special Court for People's Representatives, which heard the petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) challenging the Lokayukta 'B' Report that stated Chief Minister Siddaramaiah had no role in the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) illegal land allotment case, has reserved its verdict.
During the hearing, the Lokayukta's lawyer said that the petition filed by the ED is not allowed under the law. There is no clarity about the investigation in the ED's petition. The ED had given a letter and 27 documents to the Lokayukta police. Based on these documents, the Lokayukta Investigating Officer filed the 'B' Report.
The ED's letter was also leaked to the media. This letter and the documents are included on page 646 of the charge sheet. The Lokayukta Investigating Officer's opinion has also been recorded. The ED is not an aggrieved party and does not have the right to question the 'B' Report. The ED is not allowed to file such an interim application, lawyer Venkatesh Arabatdi argued, citing a Supreme Court verdict.
“The Lokayukta Investigating Officer examined all the documents collected by the police and others and gave their opinion. If the ED, a third party, is allowed to intervene, it will create complications,” lawyer Venkatesh Arabatdi urged, requesting that the ED's application not be considered.
Later, ED lawyer Madhukar Deshpande argued that the ED is a statutory informant under Section 66(2) of the PMLA Act. The ED’s powers were clarified in the Vijay Madanlal Chaudhary case. Judgments in the Martin and Nagaraj cases in 2022 also upheld the ED's powers. The Supreme Court ruled that ED and local police investigations should be complementary. In such cases, the aggrieved person does not need to be directly affected. The ED can also file a complaint against the 'B' Report, he argued.
following which, the lawyer for the complainant, Snehamayi Krishna, argued that if any person provides information, they should be considered a witness.
But while the Lokayukta police gave one version, the ED gave another. The Lokayukta said the police had not considered the ED's report.
The court, after hearing all arguments, reserved its order for April 15.
