Mangaluru: Advocate Manjunath N, legal counsel for Sujatha Bhat, mother of missing medical student Ananya Bhat, has raised serious concerns regarding an alleged artificial shortage of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) equipment crucial to the ongoing Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into the mass burials case in Dharmasthala.
In a press statement issued on Tuesday, Advocate Manjunath highlighted that there has been a deliberate blocking of access to GPR technology, which is essential for locating potential human remains at identified sites in Dharmasthala. Sujatha Bhat, whose daughter went missing in 2003, has been actively urging the SIT to deploy advanced GPR methods in the investigation.
“There are very few private sector suppliers of GPR in India, and we have received information that existing equipment has been pre-booked by unknown vested interests,” the statement read. It further alleged that certain private firms were being discouraged, or even threatened, against cooperating with the SIT by providing the necessary equipment.
The advocate urged members of the media and investigative journalists to probe this suspicious trend, including whether there has been a surge in equipment bookings coinciding with the timeline of the Dharmasthala probe, and whether any pressure or inducements have been placed on GPR suppliers.
Furthermore, the advocate expressed strong appreciation for the SIT’s efforts under the leadership of DGP Pranab Mohanty, praising the team’s professionalism and resolve in pursuing the sensitive case.
Any attempt to block the availability of essential technology would be a grave injustice to the families of missing persons, he added.
“They deserve nothing less than a thorough, scientific investigation. The people of Karnataka and India have the right to know the truth,” the advocate said.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Visakhapatnam (PTI): India fought back gallantly through Prasidh Krishna and Kuldeep Yadav after Quinton de Kock struck his 23rd hundred, keeping South Africa to a manageable 270 in the third and series-deciding final ODI, here Saturday.
India won the toss after judging the spin of the coin incorrectly 20 times in a row. They had little hesitation in inserting the Proteas into bat, a clear indication of dew factor dominating the thought.
After Arshdeep Singh sent back Ryan Rickelton early, De Kock (106, 89b, 8x4, 6x4) struck his seventh century against India and put on 113 runs off 124 balls with skipper Temba Bavuma (48, 67b) as the visitors moved to a healthy position.
De Kock was severe on Prasidh (4/66), who erred on length continuously in his first spell (2-0-27-0). The left-hander biffed the pacer for 6, 6, 4 in his second over to milk 18 runs.
The 32-year-old quickly pounced on anything that was short, and pacers Prasidh and Harshit offered him plenty of feed on his pet areas.
Bavuma was more sedate, and made runs through those typical dabs and jabs, occasionally unfurling a drive of elan.
De Kock moved to fifty in 42 balls, and never let the tempo down reaching his hundred in 79 balls.
India found temporary relief when Ravindra Jadeja induced a false slash from Bavuma to get caught by Virat Kohli at point.
The tourists got another move on through a 54-run partnership between De Kock and Matthew Breetzkle for the third wicket, and at 168 for two in 28 overs they were in a good position to press on.
But Breetzke's punishment of part-time spinner Tilak Varma forced a rethink in the Indian camp, as skipper KL Rahul brought back Prasidh for a second spell.
What a masterstroke it turned out to be! The Karnataka man broke the back of South Africa’s top and middle order in an exceptional second spell (4-0-11-3).
Breetzke was the first man to go, trapped plumb in front with a straight one and four balls later Aiden Markram uppishly chipped a fuller delivery to Kohli at short covers.
Prasidh soon castled De Kock, whose ugly cross-batted swipe failed to connect a full length delivery from the pacer.
All of a sudden, SA found themselves at a shaky 199 for five, losing three wickets in the space of three overs.
Once Prasidh was done away with the top and middle-order, left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep (4/41) took over and mopped up the tail as SA fell short of even a par total on this track.
