"Even a WhatsApp message can create havoc in someone's life"
Here’s what Cybercrime expert Dr.Ananth Prabhu advices internet users
Mangaluru: “Today’s generation is so much into the smartphones and internet that they are less bothered about their privacy and online safety. That is what is driving a range of cybercrimes that they find themselves trapped into the web of hackers and criminals” the views were expressed by Dr. Ananth Prabhu G. Dr. Ananth is the man behind ‘Cyber Safe Girl’ campaign and an online course that gives internet users ‘License to use internet’ much like the driving license issued by authorities enabling them to drive vehicles.
After the success of first version of the online campaign course/booklets which received over three lakh downloads, Dr. Ananth Prabhu’s team recently released the version 2.0 of the campaign. The latest version comes with awareness and safety tips of 10 new common cybercrimes.
Apart from being a faculty in the department of Computer Science & Engineering in one of the reputed college of the city, Ananth is also a guest faculty at Karnataka Police Academy and Karnataka Judicial Academy for Cyber Crime and Cyber Law.
A team of Vartha Bharati met Ananth to know more about the ‘Cyber Safe Girl’ and interview him wherein he detailed about the campaign, its idea, aims and objectives. Here are the excerpts of the interview:
Tell us about the Cyber Safe Girl Campaign, Booklets and Course.
The idea of such a campaign was pitched under the supervision of ADGP Sanjay Sahay in 2018. The idea was to create cyber awareness among the newer generation who are mostly glued to the smartphones screens and internet. We had it in our minds that we should come up with something interesting and unique to attract the youngsters to safeguard themselves from cybercrimes and other online frauds. So decided to release a booklet with infotoons that creatively raise awareness and help people avoid cybercrimes against them. We shortlisted 15 most common cybercrimes and raised awareness against it. The first version received good response. More than 3 lakh people downloaded the soft copies online and were benefitted by the campaign.
How does the online certification course of the campaign work and help?
It is very simple but very beneficial certification course. It is more like once you have this certificate, you can proudly flaunt it and say you have the license to use internet much like your driving license. What you get in it is tips about how to be safe on internet, video detailing about the 25 most common cybercrimes with 10 new addition to the list in version 2.0, tips about precautionary measures to take while using internet. This will be followed by a 30 minutes online test passing which will give the users an E-Certificate. (The course is available on www.cybersafegirl.com ) We have also requested the authorities to consider a compulsory subject for students in colleges and schools regarding cyber security.
Why the campaign is designed and focused more on girls?
The idea for this was somehow derived from ‘Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao’ campaign of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. It is very important to save girl child today with what how the society is evolving against girl child. On a larger part this campaign is not designed or limited only to girl child. Anybody can be a victim of cybercrime. Boys, Girls anyone at time we have also seen police officers being the victims of cybercrimes. Even a simple WhatsApp message that people receive in groups can cause havoc in their lives. It can contain viruses, malware etc that can actually rob into your bank account through internet banking, they can access your camera of mobile without you knowing and can capture your private moment. The same footage is used to blackmail you. So everyone is vulnerable to cybercrime. But, again girls are the soft targets of hackers and criminals. They post their pictures on social media sites which can be used by hackers and criminals and be morphed to blackmail girls. This is the most common cybercrime these days. That is why taking idea from ‘Beti Bachao, Beti padhao’ we made it ‘Beti Bachao cybercrimes se’. We have received a few suggestions from our well-wishers regarding coming up with ‘Cyber Safe Boy’ project. So to avoid the confusion we have started a new project which is continuation of Cyber Safe Girl campaign but we have named it ‘Cyber Safe Campus’ it is being implemented in schools and colleges now. It will be a 3-hour program where our teams will interact with students and create awareness about cyber security.
It has been two days since the release of version 2.0 of the campaign, how has been the feedback so far?
The feedback has been really good. The students are taking up the online course with great interest. It can also be because we have tried to make it interesting for them by introducing grading system for the course based on their performances in the test. That has triggered a competition-like trend among students who wants to boast about their grades. For those who score out of out marks in the test, we giveaway the campaign’s merchandises like t-shirts, coffee mugs etc so that has got the students excited about it. At the bigger picture I want to take this campaign to national and international level also, so that we all become cyber safe. But initially we will keep it in Karnataka and then expand to national and international levels.
Who all can take this course and get certified as ‘safe’ internet users?
It is open for all, not just open for all I feel each and every one who use internet should take this course. But the issue is the course is currently being offered only in English language, so only those who know English can take this up right now. The good part is we have a few volunteers who have offered to translate the course in other languages as well including Kannada, Tamil and Gujrati. We are giving it a thought and will come up with something that can provide access of this course for all.
How many people did you expect to reach when planning the release of first version? What are your expectations with version 2.0?
Our team expected to reach around 10 lakh people with its first version. But we did not get enough support back then as it was something new. We managed to reach 3 lakh downloads which of course is a good number too. We have a lot of people to thank to for achieving the number. Many people tried and supported us. But this time I can assure you that the number will be much higher as we have gathered support from many key personalities and influencers from across the state. The authorities and officers who did not support us last time have come up and have backed us with the version 2.0. So I am expecting to reach 10 lakh people this time but I am sure it will exceed that figure too.
Do you think the course has so far made differences to the lives of people?
Definitely yes. I have received more than 300-400 messages myself thanking me for coming up with such a concept. They say because of completing the course they feel safe while using internet. These people includes everyone boys, girls, students, professionals. And as we know, many people who take up the course and have felt benefitted will not be able to contact us and acknowledge it. I am sure it has made difference in many lives.
Ananth Prabhu before concluding the interview appealed people to take up the course which is very easy and free of cost to ensure their safety while browsing internet.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Single higher education regulator bill tabled in LS; Oppn flags ‘centralisation,' JPC likely
New Delhi: A bill to set up a 13-member body to regulate institutions of higher education was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Monday.
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan introduced the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, which seeks to establish an overarching higher education commission along with three councils for regulation, accreditation, and ensuring academic standards for universities and higher education institutions in India.
Meanwhile, the move drew strong opposition, with members warning that it could weaken institutional autonomy and result in excessive centralisation of higher education in India.
The Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025, earlier known as the Higher Education Council of India (HECI) Bill, has been introduced in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
The proposed legislation seeks to merge three existing regulatory bodies, the University Grants Commission (UGC), the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), into a single unified body called the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan.
At present, the UGC regulates non-technical higher education institutions, the AICTE oversees technical education, and the NCTE governs teacher education in India.
Under the proposed framework, the new commission will function through three separate councils responsible for regulation, accreditation, and the maintenance of academic standards across universities and higher education institutions in the country.
According to the Bill, the present challenges faced by higher educational institutions due to the multiplicity of regulators having non-harmonised regulatory approval protocols will be done away with.
The higher education commission, which will be headed by a chairperson appointed by the President of India, will cover all central universities and colleges under it, institutes of national importance functioning under the administrative purview of the Ministry of Education, including IITs, NITs, IISc, IISERs, IIMs, and IIITs.
At present, IITs and IIMs are not regulated by the University Grants Commission (UGC).
Government to refer bill to JPC; Oppn slams it
The government has expressed its willingness to refer it to a joint committee after several members of the Lok Sabha expressed strong opposition to the Bill, stating that they were not given time to study its provisions.
Responding to the opposition, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government intends to refer the Bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for detailed examination.
Congress Lok Sabha MP Manish Tewari warned that the Bill could result in “excessive centralisation” of higher education. He argued that the proposed law violates the constitutional division of legislative powers between the Union and the states.
According to him, the Bill goes beyond setting academic standards and intrudes into areas such as administration, affiliation, and the establishment and closure of university campuses. These matters, he said, fall under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List and Entry 32 of the State List, which cover the incorporation and regulation of state universities.
Tewari further stated that the Bill suffers from “excessive delegation of legislative power” to the proposed commission. He pointed out that crucial aspects such as accreditation frameworks, degree-granting powers, penalties, institutional autonomy, and even the supersession of institutions are left to be decided through rules, regulations, and executive directions. He argued that this amounts to a violation of established constitutional principles governing delegated legislation.
Under the Bill, the regulatory council will have the power to impose heavy penalties on higher education institutions for violating provisions of the Act or related rules. Penalties range from ₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh for repeated violations, while establishing an institution without approval from the commission or the state government could attract a fine of up to ₹2 crore.
Concerns were also raised by members from southern states over the Hindi nomenclature of the Bill. N.K. Premachandran, an MP from the Revolutionary Socialist Party representing Kollam in Kerala, said even the name of the Bill was difficult to pronounce.
He pointed out that under Article 348 of the Constitution, the text of any Bill introduced in Parliament must be in English unless Parliament decides otherwise.
DMK MP T.M. Selvaganapathy also criticised the government for naming laws and schemes only in Hindi. He said the Constitution clearly mandates that the nomenclature of a Bill should be in English so that citizens across the country can understand its intent.
Congress MP S. Jothimani from Tamil Nadu’s Karur constituency described the Bill as another attempt to impose Hindi and termed it “an attack on federalism.”
_vb_22.jpeg)
