Form SIT under IPS Pranab Mohanty: Lawyers urge probe in alleged Dharmasthala killings case
Bengaluru: Amid growing outrage over shocking allegations in the Dharmasthala serial killings case, a strong and united call has emerged from civil society and the legal fraternity demanding the immediate formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) under the leadership of senior IPS officer Pranab Mohanty.
The demand follows a complaint filed recently at the Dharmasthala police station by an individual who alleged the presence of multiple buried bodies in and around the village in Belthangady taluk. The complainant also testified before a local court on July 11, drawing widespread public attention to the case.
Speaking to the media, advocates Ojasvi Gowda and Sachin Deshpande, representing the complainant, urged the Karnataka government to constitute an SIT led by a senior, impartial officer. Citing precedents from the Karnataka High Court, the lawyers emphasised that only a high-level, credible and independent investigation can uncover the full truth behind these alleged serial killings.
They specifically referenced the April 25, 2025 order by the Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition No. 8403 of 2025, in which the court had acknowledged Pranab Mohanty's leadership and directed that an SIT be formed under his supervision in a similar matter. This, they argued, further justifies his appointment in the current case.
The advocates pointed out that the earlier experience with the SIT constituted in the 2012 Sowjanya case had ended in controversy and public disappointment. That failure, they said, underlines the urgent need to ensure the current SIT is effective, transparent and driven by integrity.
In their statement, they noted: “A truly independent and competent SIT is not just desirable, it is absolutely essential to deliver justice to the victims. The disturbing complexity of this case demands a thorough and credible investigation to restore public trust.”
The lawyers added that many in the legal profession, including retired judges, prominent activists, and senior advocates, had come forward in support of the demand for an SIT. They also called for transparency in the appointment of investigating officers (IOs) and supervisory staff, insisting that all members of the SIT be individuals with proven integrity, and that these appointments be made based on recommendations by Mohanty himself.
Further, they emphasised the need for a publicly accessible, documented process that ensures the selection of officers follows strict ethical protocols.
“We have no personal or professional connection with Mr. Pranab Mohanty. Our collective appeal is rooted solely in our responsibility as legal professionals confronting a case of serious public importance. In such testing circumstances, we believe it is our duty to amplify this widespread call for justice,” the advocates stated.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
If you have a conscience, apologize to the people: R Ashoka slams Yathindra over Nalwadi comparison
Bengaluru: Leader of the Opposition R. Ashoka launched a scathing attack on MLC Dr. Yathindra, demanding that he retract his controversial statement comparing Chief Minister Siddaramaiah to the late Maharaja Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar. Ashoka urged Yathindra to apologize to the people of Karnataka if he had even a shred of conscience and any respect for the Mysuru royal lineage.
In a strongly worded social media post on Sunday, Ashoka stated, “Comparing Siddaramaiah to Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar is nothing short of absurd. Where is Nalwadi, who was bestowed the title of ‘Rajarshi’ by Mahatma Gandhi himself, and where is Siddaramaiah, who has stooped to being a puppet in the hands of fake Gandhis for the sake of power?”
He continued his critique by contrasting the enduring legacy of Nalwadi, remembered fondly by Kannadigas for his people-centric development, with what he termed as Siddaramaiah’s failure to manage Karnataka’s economy, burdening every household with debt.
Ashoka highlighted several stark differences, while Nalwadi built Mysore University over a century ago, Siddaramaiah is shutting down nine universities due to lack of funds. Nalwadi famously sold his family’s gold to build the KRS dam, whereas Siddaramaiah is accused of grabbing 14 sites meant for the public. Nalwadi established Bhadravati Iron & Steel Plant, Sandalwood Soap Factory, and Mysore Paper Mills. In contrast, Ashoka claimed Siddaramaiah's governance drove away industries, investors, and entrepreneurs. Nalwadi pioneered reservations for the backward classes long before it became mainstream. Siddaramaiah, Ashoka alleged, is reducing social justice to a gimmick by sticking labels on doors in the name of surveys.
While acknowledging Yathindra’s emotional attachment to his father, Ashoka emphasized that comparing Siddaramaiah to a visionary like Nalwadi was “laughable, baseless, and a gross insult” to the late king.
In his concluding remarks, Ashoka slammed the government for ignoring farmers’ needs despite an early monsoon. He accused the administration of being caught up in internal power struggles and negligence, forcing farmers into despair. “This government will not be spared from the curse of the farmers,” he warned.
