Government transfers Dharmasthala mass burial case to SIT
Karnataka Home Department issues formal order
Mangaluru: The Karnataka government has officially transferred the investigation into the shocking Dharmasthala serial murder allegations to a Special Investigation Team (SIT), following explosive media reports and a formal request from the Karnataka State Women’s Commission.
In a government order dated July 19, 2025, the Home Department announced the formation of the SIT to conduct a comprehensive and impartial probe into the disturbing allegations, including mass graves, sexual violence, and the disappearance of women and students in and around Dharmasthala over the past two decades.
Dakshina Kannada Superintendent of Police Dr. Arun K. confirmed the development in a press statement, saying: "The government has officially handed over case number 39/2025 of Dharmasthala Police Station to the SIT as of July 19. The team will soon assume charge of the investigation."
The probe stems from a chilling statement submitted by a former sanitation worker in court, claiming to have buried hundreds of human bodies in the Dharmasthala region. On July 12, national media outlets, including Times Now, reported the discovery of a human skull and the testimony of a family alleging the disappearance of a female medical student.
The Karnataka State Women’s Commission took serious note of these reports and, in its letter dated July 14 (Ref: 481/2025-26/7817), urged the state government to constitute an SIT. The Commission highlighted patterns of unnatural deaths, rape, disappearances, and brutal violence spanning over two decades, predominantly involving women and girl students.
The SIT will be led by Dr. Pronab Mohanty, IPS, Director General of Police (Internal Security Division), Bangalore, who will act as the Chief of the team. Other members include:
M.N. Anucheth, IPS, Deputy Inspector General of Police (Recruitment), Bangalore
Soumya Latha, IPS, Deputy Commissioner of Police, CAR Headquarters, Bangalore City
Jitendra Kumar Dayama, IPS, Superintendent of Police, Internal Security Division, Bangalore
The SIT has been empowered to investigate not only the registered case (Crime No. 39/2025 under Section 211A of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) but also any other related criminal cases that may have been registered or could be registered in other police stations across Karnataka.
The team has been instructed to operate out of the Dakshina Kannada district police headquarters and may draw upon available local resources. It is also mandated to submit periodic updates to the Director General and Inspector General of Police, and ultimately, a final investigation report to the state government via the DGP's office.
The order, issued by S Ambika, Under Secretary, Department of Home (Crimes), was circulated to senior officials including the Chief Secretary, Home Minister’s Secretariat, and Principal Secretaries of rlevant departments.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Single higher education regulator bill tabled in LS; Oppn flags ‘centralisation,' JPC likely
New Delhi: A bill to set up a 13-member body to regulate institutions of higher education was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Monday.
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan introduced the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, which seeks to establish an overarching higher education commission along with three councils for regulation, accreditation, and ensuring academic standards for universities and higher education institutions in India.
Meanwhile, the move drew strong opposition, with members warning that it could weaken institutional autonomy and result in excessive centralisation of higher education in India.
The Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025, earlier known as the Higher Education Council of India (HECI) Bill, has been introduced in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
The proposed legislation seeks to merge three existing regulatory bodies, the University Grants Commission (UGC), the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), into a single unified body called the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan.
At present, the UGC regulates non-technical higher education institutions, the AICTE oversees technical education, and the NCTE governs teacher education in India.
Under the proposed framework, the new commission will function through three separate councils responsible for regulation, accreditation, and the maintenance of academic standards across universities and higher education institutions in the country.
According to the Bill, the present challenges faced by higher educational institutions due to the multiplicity of regulators having non-harmonised regulatory approval protocols will be done away with.
The higher education commission, which will be headed by a chairperson appointed by the President of India, will cover all central universities and colleges under it, institutes of national importance functioning under the administrative purview of the Ministry of Education, including IITs, NITs, IISc, IISERs, IIMs, and IIITs.
At present, IITs and IIMs are not regulated by the University Grants Commission (UGC).
Government to refer bill to JPC; Oppn slams it
The government has expressed its willingness to refer it to a joint committee after several members of the Lok Sabha expressed strong opposition to the Bill, stating that they were not given time to study its provisions.
Responding to the opposition, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government intends to refer the Bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for detailed examination.
Congress Lok Sabha MP Manish Tewari warned that the Bill could result in “excessive centralisation” of higher education. He argued that the proposed law violates the constitutional division of legislative powers between the Union and the states.
According to him, the Bill goes beyond setting academic standards and intrudes into areas such as administration, affiliation, and the establishment and closure of university campuses. These matters, he said, fall under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List and Entry 32 of the State List, which cover the incorporation and regulation of state universities.
Tewari further stated that the Bill suffers from “excessive delegation of legislative power” to the proposed commission. He pointed out that crucial aspects such as accreditation frameworks, degree-granting powers, penalties, institutional autonomy, and even the supersession of institutions are left to be decided through rules, regulations, and executive directions. He argued that this amounts to a violation of established constitutional principles governing delegated legislation.
Under the Bill, the regulatory council will have the power to impose heavy penalties on higher education institutions for violating provisions of the Act or related rules. Penalties range from ₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh for repeated violations, while establishing an institution without approval from the commission or the state government could attract a fine of up to ₹2 crore.
Concerns were also raised by members from southern states over the Hindi nomenclature of the Bill. N.K. Premachandran, an MP from the Revolutionary Socialist Party representing Kollam in Kerala, said even the name of the Bill was difficult to pronounce.
He pointed out that under Article 348 of the Constitution, the text of any Bill introduced in Parliament must be in English unless Parliament decides otherwise.
DMK MP T.M. Selvaganapathy also criticised the government for naming laws and schemes only in Hindi. He said the Constitution clearly mandates that the nomenclature of a Bill should be in English so that citizens across the country can understand its intent.
Congress MP S. Jothimani from Tamil Nadu’s Karur constituency described the Bill as another attempt to impose Hindi and termed it “an attack on federalism.”
_vb_22.jpeg)
