Hikmah Educational Trust, Mangaluru: New office-bearers elected
Mangaluru: Hikmah Educational Trust (HET) was formed in the year 2016 to impart education to the society and to establish, run modern educational institutions with values for the benefit of the people.
Accordingly, at present, the Trust is running a Montessori nursery and a primary school in Attavar by name The Shepherds’ International Academy (SIA). The Trust is planning to start higher primary classes, a high school and a pre-university college in the near future on a new campus in Mangaluru.
As the term of previous office bearers is completed, the Board of Trustees conducted a meeting on 12th September, 2022 to select the new office-bearers of the trust through an election process. The polling officer conducted the election to select the chairman of the Trust for the new term.
Three nominations were received for the position of Chairman. All the members of the Board of Trustees cast their votes in favour of Ar. Mohammed Nissar, and elected him as the chairman for the new term of the years, from 2022 to 2025. Ar. Mohammed Nissar being on the chair, the Board of Trustees elected Mohammed Rizwan as secretary and Shajid A K as the treasurer for the new term from 2022 to 2025.
The Board of Trustees complemented the new office-bearers and assured their full cooperation in managing the educational institutions with quality standards.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Court can reject anticipatory bail but cannot direct accused to surrender: SC
New Delhi (PTI): A court can reject anticipatory bail of an accused but it has no jurisdiction to direct him to surrender before the trial court, the Supreme Court has said.
A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and Ujjal Bhuyan made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a man accused of cheating and forgery.
"If the court wants to reject the anticipatory bail, it may do so, but the court has no jurisdiction to say that the petitioner should now surrender," the bench said.
The Jharkhand High Court had rejected anticipatory bail plea of the accused and asked him to surrender and seek regular bail.
In this case, a complaint had been filed before a magistrate alleging offences under Sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 420 (cheating), 467 (forgery of valuable security), 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (using forged document) and 120B read with 34 of the IPC, in connection with a land dispute.
The high court had dismissed the second anticipatory bail application of the accused on the ground that no new circumstances were shown.
It had relied on its earlier order rejecting his first anticipatory bail plea, in which the court directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail in terms of the decision in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI.
The top court said such a direction was wholly without jurisdiction and said that if a court chooses to reject anticipatory bail, it may do so, but it cannot compel the accused to surrender.
