Majlise Islah wa Tanzeem hosts workshop on Cybersecurity, Cyber Laws in Bhatkal
Bhatkal, August 10: The Media Watch Committee of Majlise Islah wa Tanzeem conducted a one-day workshop on cybersecurity and cyber laws at Rabita Hall, Bhatkal.
The event aimed at raising awareness among students, social media influencers, group administrators, and community leaders about the evolving digital landscape and the importance of secure online practices.
The workshop commenced with a session by Advocate BT Venkatesh, a distinguished human rights defender and former public prosecutor of Karnataka. In his address, Venkatesh explored the multifaceted role of social media in contemporary society. He described social media as a double-edged sword—while it empowers individuals to voice their opinions and connect with broader audiences, it also exposes them to risks such as misinformation, privacy breaches, and cyberbullying. Venkatesh stressed the importance of responsible social media usage, urging the audience to be discerning about the content they consume and share.
He also highlighted how social media can be a powerful educational tool, enabling students to access a wealth of information and learn new skills.
Dr. Anant Prabhu, a leading cybersecurity expert, followed with an in-depth discussion on the critical aspects of cybersecurity and the legal framework surrounding it.
Dr. Prabhu underscored the growing threat of cybercrimes, noting that as technology advances, so do the methods used by cybercriminals. He elaborated on various forms of cybercrimes, such as phishing, identity theft, and hacking, explaining how these threats can impact individuals and organizations alike.
Dr. Prabhu emphasized the need for constant vigilance and proactive measures to protect personal and sensitive information online. He advised the audience to adopt strong passwords, use two-factor authentication, and stay updated on the latest cybersecurity practices. Additionally, he discussed the legal implications of cybercrimes, detailing the laws in place to combat such offenses and protect victims.
Both resource persons also interacted with the attendees, answering questions and offering personalized advice on how to navigate the digital world safely. They emphasized that while technology offers numerous benefits, it is essential to approach it with a cautious and informed mindset.
The event saw the participation of several notable figures from the community, including Majlise Islah wa Tanzeem President Inayathullah Shabandri, Vice President Ateequr Rahman Muniri, General Secretary Moulana Abdul Raqeeb MJ, and Admin Secretary Jailani Shabandri. The Media Watch Committee's Convener, Aftab Kola, Joint Convener Mubasshir Hallare, and committee member Misbah ul Haq Shaikh were also present. The workshop was further graced by the presence of Yunus Kazia, President of Anjuman Hami-e-Muslimeen and a prominent businessman, as well as Qamar Sada, Vice President of the Indian Overseas Congress and an NRI businessman, among others.
The workshop concluded with an interactive session, where participants engaged in discussions with the experts, seeking guidance on various cybersecurity issues and the ethical use of social media. The event was well-received by the attendees, who appreciated the valuable insights and practical advice provided by the speakers.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Delhi HC Judge Justice Sharma to pass order on recusal plea by Kejriwal at 4.30 pm
New Delhi (PTI): Delhi High Court Judge Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma on Monday said that she would pronounce her verdict at 4.30 pm on pleas by Arvind Kejriwal and others seeking her recusal in the liquor policy case, as she took on record additional pleadings by the AAP chief on his plea.
Justice Sharma said although the pronouncement was scheduled for 2:30 pm, she was "going out of her way" in accepting Kejriwal's rejoinder as a written submission in the matter.
The former chief minister virtually appeared before the judge through video conferencing and urged her to take on record his rejoinder to the written submissions filed by the CBI.
Even as Kejriwal asserted that the registry's refusal to take his rejoinder on record was "miscarriage of justice", Justice Sharma remarked that since he was not being represented by a lawyer, the court went "out of its way" for him when it permitted him to file his additional affidavit last week even after the order on the recusal issue was reserved.
The judge said that as per the registry's rule, a party in-person must take permission from the court to file anything and since the present case was not "extraordinary", the same practice was being followed.
She added that in law, there is no concept of filing a "rejoinder" to the opposite party's written submissions, and she would permit Kejriwal to tender his pleadings as written submissions instead, so that he does not feel that he was not heard.
"You say you have respect for me. I have respect for every litigant. The rule of court will not be changed for anyone so I will treat it as written submissions. I am taking it on record. I am giving the indulgence to Mr Kejriwal," the court stated.
Solicitor general Tushar Mehta appeared for the CBI and opposed Kejriwal's request to file rejoinder. Mehta said nowhere in the country were pleadings taken on record after order was reserved a court.
He also said there is no concept of filing rejoinder to a written submission, and the court should do what it would do for any ordinary litigant.
Kejriwal had raised several objections against the judge hearing the CBI's plea against his discharge in the liquor policy case, including that she had earlier denied him relief on his petition challenging his arrest and refused to grant relief on the bail pleas of other accused, including Manish Sisodia and K Kavitha.
He also claimed that Justice Sharma had made "strong and conclusive" findings.
The former Delhi chief minister further alleged a "direct conflict of interest", claiming that the judge's children are empanelled central government lawyers who receive work through the solicitor general, who is appearing in the matter for the CBI.
Besides Kejriwal, the applications for recusal of the judge were also filed by AAP leaders Manish Sisodia and Durgesh Pathak.
Other respondents, including Vijay Nair and Arun Ramchandra Pillai, have also sought her recusal.
Solicitor General urged Justice Sharma to initiate contempt action against Kejriwal and others for seeking her recusal.
Terming concerns by Kejriwal and others as "apprehensions of an immature mind," Mehta told the court it was a matter of "institutional respect" and Justice Sharma should not succumb to pressure as her recusal on "unfounded allegations" would set a bad precedent.
On February 27, the trial court discharged Kejriwal, Sisodia and others in the Delhi liquor policy case, saying that the CBI's case was wholly unable to survive judicial scrutiny and stood discredited in its entirety.
