Mangaluru: Barrier collapse at Netravati River project amid NGT stay sparks outrage
Mangaluru: A barrier constructed for the waterfront project on the banks of the Netravati River has collapsed near Mulihithlu, causing significant public outrage. This incident occurred even as the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in Chennai stayed the project's work following opposition from environmentalists and locals.
Deputy Commissioner Mullai Muhilan has ordered an investigation into the collapse. Assistant Commissioner Raju K. stated that notices will be issued to the supervising officers, and payments to the contractors responsible for the construction will be withheld pending further inquiry.
The Netravati River Front (waterfront) project, stretching 2.1 km from Morgansgate to Bolar, developed by Mangalore Smart City Limited, aims to transform the area into a walking area. As part of the project, a barrier wall was constructed along the riverbank and soil filling was carried out. However, heavy rains last week caused a section of the barrier near Mulihithlu to collapse.
Smart City officials reported that 1,200 meters of the project has been completed, with some areas filled with soil. These sections were intended to be leveled with a roller. Unfortunately, water infiltrated one part of the project, creating a pit and leading to the collapse of the barrier wall. Officials have stated that the contractor responsible for the construction will be questioned regarding the incident.
Arun Prabha, Senior Officer of the Siruva Smart City Project, assured that such problems would not recur.
The project spans 2.1 km, but currently, work is ongoing only up to 1,600 meters. Local opposition has led to court cases concerning the remaining sections, indicating that the project's completion is contingent on resolving these issues.
Environmentalists have expressed strong opposition. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has been approached by the NECF alleging violations of environmental norms related to the Netravati waterfront project. The NGT has registered a case and issued a notice to the district administration and the relevant committee to investigate these allegations. Both the committee and the district collector have conducted site inspections. Meanwhile, the collapse of the barrier wall has bolstered the objections of locals and environmental activists, strengthening allegations of regulatory violations.
Following the NGT order, a joint committee arrived to inspect environmental norm violations in the project area. The Deputy Commissioner had also visited the project area. However, the NECF, which filed the complaint with the NGT, was not informed or provided with the opportunity to present documents for verification. Smart City officials, along with some project supporters, were called for inspection instead. This has led to dissatisfaction among activists of the National Environment Care Federation (NECF), who are unclear about the nature of the project.
The site of the barrier wall collapse will be visited and inspected, and the engineers and officials responsible will be called and cautioned to carry out their work diligently. A notice regarding the collapse will also be issued to the concerned parties. The investigation is currently underway by the NGT, and work will resume only after obtaining permission from the NGT.
Raju K., Assistant Commissioner, Mangaluru
A bridge in Bihar collapsed before its inauguration. This project, undertaken by people’s representatives in a district known for its intelligent population, risks losing hundreds of crores of rupees. What is the story behind this spending plan if the barrier collapses after a few days of rain? The project is being carried out flouting all environment laws. Even before the inauguration, the barrier has collapsed. Despite the apparent looting of the environment and people's tax money, the concerned authorities remain silent. Fake activists are working to cause trouble against those legitimately opposing it.
Shasidhara Shetty, Convenor, NECF
The Netravati WaterFront Project was initially estimated at Rs. 70 crore but has since been revised and sanctioned for Rs. 32 crores. The project covers a distance of 2.1 km and is designed for non-motor vehicle use, with facilities for cycling and other amenities for public enjoyment. Arun Prabha, a senior officer of Smart City Limited informed that currently, 5% of the work, amounting to Rs. 5 crore, has been completed, and the contractor has been paid Rs. 2,42,18,650.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
CJI calls for 'unified judicial policy', use of technology to converge practices across courts
Jaisalmer (PTI): Pushing for a "unified judicial policy", Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Saturday said technology can help align standards and practices across courts, creating a "seamless experience" for citizens, regardless of their location.
He said high courts -- due to the federal structure -- have had their own practices and technological capacities, and "regional barriers" can be broken down with technology to create a more unified judicial ecosystem.
Delivering the keynote address at the West Zone Regional Conference in Jaisalmer, Kant proposed the idea of a "national judicial ecosystem" and called for an overhaul of India's judicial system with the integration of technology.
"Today, as technology reduces geographical barriers and enables convergence, it invites us to think of justice not as regional systems operating in parallel, but as one national ecosystem with shared standards, seamless interfaces, and coordinated goals," he said.
He emphasised how the role of technology in the judiciary has evolved over time.
"Technology is no longer merely an administrative convenience. It has evolved into a constitutional instrument that strengthens equality before the law, expands access to justice, and enhances institutional efficiency," he said, highlighting how digital tools can bridge gaps in the judicial system.
Kant pointed out that technology enables the judiciary to overcome the limitations of physical distance and bureaucratic hurdles.
"It allows the judiciary to transcend physical barriers and bureaucratic rigidities to deliver outcomes that are timely, transparent and principled," he said, adding that the effective use of technology can modernise the delivery of justice and make it more accessible to citizens across the country.
The CJI called for implementing a "unified judicial policy".
He said India's judicial system has long been shaped by its federal structure, and different high courts have their own practices and technological capacities.
"India's vast diversity has led to different high courts evolving their own practices, administrative priorities and technological capacities. This variation, though natural in a federal democracy, has resulted in uneven experiences for litigants across the country," he said.
Kant underscored that predictability is crucial for building trust in the judicial system.
"A core expectation citizens place upon the courts is predictability," he said, adding that citizens should not only expect fair treatment but also consistency in how cases are handled across the country.
He pointed to the potential of technology in improving predictability.
"Technology enables us to track systemic delays and make problems visible rather than concealed," he said.
By identifying areas where delays occur, such as in bail matters or cases involving certain types of disputes, courts can take targeted action to address these issues and improve efficiency, Kant said.
The CJI explained that data-driven tools could identify the reasons behind delays or bottlenecks, allowing for faster, more focused solutions.
"Technology enables prioritisation by flagging sensitive case categories, monitoring pendency in real time and ensuring transparent listing protocols," he said.
Justice Surya Kant also discussed the importance of prioritising urgent cases where delays could result in significant harm. He highlighted his recent administrative order that ensures urgent cases, such as bail petitions or habeas corpus cases, are listed within two days of curing defects.
"Where delay causes deep harm, the system must respond with urgency," he stated, explaining that technology can help courts identify and expedite such cases.
Kant also raised the issue of the clarity of judicial decisions.
He noted that many litigants, despite winning cases, often struggle to understand the terms of their judgment due to complex legal language.
"Although the orders had gone in their favour, they remained unsure of what relief they had actually secured because the language was too technical, vague or evasive to understand," he said.
He advocated for more uniformity in how judgments are written.
"A unified judicial approach must therefore extend to how we communicate outcomes," he said.
The CJI also discussed the role of AI and digital tools in improving case management. He pointed to the potential of AI-based research assistants and digital case management systems to streamline judicial processes.
"Emerging technological tools are now capable of performing once-unthinkable functions. They can highlight missing precedent references, cluster similar legal questions, and simplify factual narration," he said, explaining how these technologies can help judges make more consistent decisions.
He also highlighted tools like the National Judicial Data Grid and e-courts, which are already helping to standardise processes like case filings and tracking.
Kant reiterated that the integration of technology into the judicial process is not just about improving efficiency but about upholding the integrity of the system and strengthening public trust.
"The measure of innovation is not the complexity of the software we deploy, but the simplicity with which a citizen understands the outcome of their case and believes that justice has been served," he said.
