MP, MLA turn blind eyes towards protest even after a week, misleading it: Allegation
Protest demanding closure of Suratkal tollgate
Committee invites MP for open discussion
Mangaluru, October 28: The overnight dharna by the Surathkal Tollgate Action Committee being conducted since October 22, demanding closure of the tollgate following the state government’s proposal to close it, entered one week.
The Committee has been protesting against collecting toll even after the state government’s decision to close it. The agitators demanded that the contract should not be renewed and the tollgate should be removed by October 30 and movement of vehicles should not be barred on old bridge till the new bridge is constructed.
Political parties like Congress, JDS, CPM, CPI and others and district Bus Owners Association and other 50 organisations extended their support to the agitation. Former minister Ramanath Rai, former MLAs Vijay Kumar Shetty, Moidin Bava, JR Lobo, INTUC state president Rakesh Malli and other leaders visited the spot where the agitators have been sitting in dharna and supported their cause. But till date, neither Lok Sabha Member Naleen Kumar Kateel nor MLA Dr Y Bharath Shetty visited the spot and enquired the agitators even after a week. Politicising the issue by Naleen Kumar has created another issue. The agitators are expressing their anger saying that the MP should not mislead the people in the issue and if he has real concerns, he should close the tollgate.
Toll Renovation
The construction of Surathkal toll gate itself is illegal. So, either it should be closed or removed. It should not be continued. If it is not closed by October 30, they would take legal action and the district administration will be held responsible for any untoward incidents, the agitators said.
Meanwhile, the National Authority officials who did not take the issue seriously have given the contract to a new company on October 24 and this has caused wrath among the agitators.
Warns of breaking law
The protest against Surathkal toll gate is not a new one. Local leaders have been fighting against the tollgate for the last one and half years. Even the Lok Sabha Member had said that he would close the tollgate. But now, the move of the MP at the time of closure of contract period has created suspicion. Considering this seriously, the local leaders formed a committee and started their agitation from August 14. Amidst this, the new company might collect the toll from October 30. Taking it as a challenge, the Committee members have decided to lay siege the tollgate and this might cause clash between the committee and the government.
MP is not keeping his words
The Committee members have made an allegation that the MP is not keeping up his words and now, they have decided to fight against the MP. The contract period of the toll collection would expire on October 30 and the MP had promised against renewing the contract at a National Highway Authority meeting. But the NHAI officials have been misleading the people. The MP, without controlling the officials, have been giving misleading statements and creating confusion, they said.
Letter to centre demanding closure of tollgate
Recently, MP Nalin Kumar Kateel said that a letter was written to the central government to close the Surathkal and BC Road toll gates instead of merging them with Hejamadi tollgate. But due to some technical reasons, the process was delayed. Even then, the central government would take a decision shortly, he had said.
He had also said that there was politics in the protest being conducted demanding closure of the tollgate. The Surathkal toll was opened during UPA administration and Oscar Fernandes was the Minister then. But then, no one had spoken about it. Why should they speak now? It was a politics, he has reportedly said.
Committee warns Nalin Kumar Katil
Condemning the attitude and statement of the MP, Committee leaders said that nothing would happen without politics in a democratic system. Their protest was about public problem. But the MP has been supporting the tollgate mafia. It was not the question of politics in the protest. It was the question of politics about what, they said asking him about his politics favouring the renovation of the tollgate.
Is your statement that you would light the fire in the district not politics? Shall I disclose who is behind the renovation process? Who is responsible for renovating the tollgate when NHAI has decided to close it? Will you come for open discussion? Will you bring your close aid MLA Bharath Shetty? Are you ready to discuss the issue in the dharna place? Committee convener Muneer Katipalla asked these questions to Nalin Kumar Kateel who remained silent over the issue.
Tollgate to be laid siege: Muneer Katipalla
Their protest will continue till the tollgate will be closed. The state government has submitted a proposal to the central government to close the tollgate. Who is responsible for calling fresh tender for collecting toll and handover the contract to a new company? Is it Nitin Gadkari? Nalin Kumar said that he would go to Nitin Gadkari along with seven BJP MLAs and place their demand. But why did he keep quiet? The MP should clarify his stand over the issue. The Action Committee has already submitted its demands to the office of the MP. But the BJP MP has been saying that he does not know anything about it. Both Nalin Kumar and Bharath Shetty have gone on the same road on Sunday. But they have not met the agitators even for courtesy sake, he said.
He will discuss with MP and committee leaders-Minister UT Khader
He would discuss with MP Nalin Kumar Kateel, MLA Bharat Shetty, former MLAs Vinay Kumar Shetty and Moidin Bava, Committee leaders in the presence of the deputy commissioner and NHAI officials about the tollgate. He would take the assurance of the NHAI given in the last meeting into account. He would direct the officials to take a suitable decision. A letter would be written from the state government to the centre. Those who are favouring the tollgate should understand that there was no provision to collect toll fee in the city corporation limits. Along with the Dakshina Kannada MP, Udupi-Chikmagalur MP should also raise their voice against tollgate issue. Shobha Karandlaje should understand that the toll fee would be a burden to the people of Udupi. Now, he was in by-election campaigning. Shortly he would visit Mangaluru and conduct a meeting. On behalf of the district administration, Mangaluru AC Ravichandra Nayak has met the agitators and held discussion. He would also place the demands of the agitators before the Chief Minister, said District Minister UT Khader.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
CPI(M) alleges attempt to cover up Kudupu mob lynching by Mangaluru Commissionerate Police
Mangaluru: The Dakshina Kannada District Committee of CPI(M) has alleged that the Mangaluru Commissionerate Police is deliberately attempting to cover up the recent mob lynching incident that occurred in Kudupu. The CPI(M) claims that the FIR registered in the case itself serves as strong evidence of this attempt.
The incident took place at Samrat Ground, Kudupu, around 3 PM on April 27, where an unidentified person was reportedly lynched by a mob. Within an hour, the information had reached the Vamanjoor Police Station. By approximately 5 PM, police officers arrived at the scene, where they found the victim’s body, which had been brutally assaulted. The police were already aware of the full details by then, and the Commissioner was also informed.
However, for various reasons, including the involvement of key accused individuals like Ravindra Nayak and Manjunath, both said to be close aides of local BJP leaders, the police allegedly decided to weaken or even suppress the case. The fear of national backlash and reputational damage to the Commissioner reportedly contributed to this decision.
As part of this cover-up, the police allegedly made Manjunath, one of the primary accused in the mob lynching, file a complaint reporting the discovery of an "unidentified body" and registered an Unnatural Death Report (UDR). Even though the police were fully aware of the incident, they issued a Lookout Circular suggesting the victim might have died due to substance abuse or after a fall, downplaying visible injuries as “minor scratches,” said Muneer Katipalla, Secretary of the CPI(M)'s Dakshina Kannada District Committee.
When media personnel approached the Police Commissioner for information and clarification, they were simply told to "wait and not believe in rumours." The Commissioner remained silent for 36 hours. It was only after political leaders and activists raised their voices on April 28, and the issue started trending on social media, that the police agreed to conduct a post-mortem. Based on the report, they finally registered an FIR under murder and mob lynching sections—32 hours after the incident.
The second complainant in the FIR was Keshav, reportedly a close associate of the same communal gang involved in the lynching. According to his statement, the victim was allegedly shouting “Pakistan Zindabad” while running toward the field, which prompted Manjunath, Sachin, and others to believe he was anti-national. They chased him, assaulted him with sticks and kicks, and killed him. Keshav further claimed he tried to stop them but was threatened and left the spot. He only learned later that Manjunath had filed the police complaint.
The CPI(M) has raised serious questions about the entire sequence of events within those critical 32 hours. Why was the initial complaint filed by one of the accused? Why did the police not take suo moto action? Why was a weak UDR filed despite full knowledge of the lynching? Why did the Commissioner remain silent for 36 hours? And why did the second FIR rely on a communal narrative involving “Pakistan” only after public pressure mounted?
Muneer Katipalla demanded a high-level probe into the conduct of the police. He said that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) led by a senior, impartial IPS officer from outside the district must be formed. He also demanded disciplinary action, including suspension, against Vamanjoor SHO Shivaprasad and Police Commissioner Anupam Agrawal for dereliction of duty and alleged complicity in the attempted cover-up.
Muneer Katipalla warned that unless these demands are met and justice is ensured, public trust in law enforcement will continue to erode.
_vb_96.jpeg)
