Take action against Venur police, DYFI demands SP
Mangaluru, October 03: A delegation of the DYFI on Wednesday met SP Ravikanthe Gowda and urged him to take action against Venur police who assaulted and booked a false case against DYFI activist Riyaz Manthoor.
Riyaz Manthoor has been actively working in the DYFI. On Tuesday night, after closing his shop at Ganjimutt, Riyaz was going to his wife’s parents house in Belthangady on a motorbike along his brother Irshad. At around 11 pm, a team of around five policemen including Taranath and Ranjith who were on rounds stopped them and asked the records of their motorbike. Riyaz and Irshad had handed over their driving licence copies to the police and said that the vehicle records were at home and they would produce them the next day morning. But the police have reportedly abused them with foul words and insulted them, it is said in the complaint.
At this time, Belthangady circle inspector Nagesh Kadri and his wife came on the same way in a private vehicle. When he asked the police about the issue, the police said that Riyaz and his brother were abusing them. Though Riyaz tried to convince Nagesh Kadri, the latter was not in a position to listen to Riyaz’s words. In turn, Kadri had insulted Riyaz with foul words saying that ‘I know my staff. Shut up…’ and asked the policemen to ‘boot them by putting them behind bars and book a case’, it is explained in the complaint.
The police took Riyaz and his brother Irshad into custody and assaulted before taking them to Venur police station. After taking them to the police station, the police gave false information that Riyaz and Irshad had attacked police personnel. Later, around 8-10 policemen thrashed them black and blue in the police lock-up, they alleged.
Taranath and Ranjith have insulted Riyaz and Irshad saying that ‘bearys are thieves and look like terrorists’. They have snatched the mobile phones and damaged them. Later, the station officer had come to the state and Riyaz family members also rushed to the station. Earlier, the police said that they would book both of them under ganja smuggling and having swords and other lethal weapons. But later, they were booked under false allegations. Threatening them not to disclose the police atrocity, they were released on station bail at 3 am, they said in the memorandum.
The attitude and activities of Venur police and Inspector Nagesh Kadri were shocking and the people would lose faith on the police department. The family of Riyaz and Irshad was panicked due to the police atrocity. Socially also, the police atrocity would have negative impact on their family, they said.
They urged the SP to intervene in the case and conducted a thorough investigation into the case and take action against the erring police personnel and ensure justice to the victims, DYFI district secretary Santosh Bajal demanded.
DYFI state president Muneer Katipalla, district president Imtiyaz, district leaders Rafeeq Harekala, Naveen Konchadi, Manoj Vamanjur, Naushad Bengre and others were present.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Karnataka Assembly passes bill on Palace Grounds amid opposition protest
Bengaluru, Mar 6 (PTI): The Karnataka Assembly on Thursday passed the Bangalore Palace (Utilisation and Regulation of Land) Bill, reaffirming state ownership over 472 acres and 16 guntas of land here, amid protests by the opposition BJP.
During the discussion, Karnataka Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H K Patil said the state government would have to provide Rs 200 crore worth of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) for each acre of land, which means that for 15 acres, Rs 3,000 crore worth of TDR would be issued.
“If we accept it, then this 2-km stretch of road will become the costliest road in the world. If we accept it then how are we going to develop the city in later stages? How will you carry out development works?” asked Patil.
He also pointed out that this question was raised not only under the Congress government but also during the previous BJP regime.
However, the BJP-led cabinet has opposed the project.
ALSO READ: Budget session: Law Min. HK Patil introduces Microfinance bill in Karnataka assembly
“Suppose we agree to it then, what will be the valuation of the 472 acres? It will be lakhs and lakhs of crores of rupees. Can we accept?” Patil wondered.
The Minister said the government had previously exercised its executive powers to issue an ordinance, which was approved by the Governor. Now the government is bringing a bill with two amendments.
“In this bill, we have made provisions either to develop or drop the road development work,” Patil explained.
However, BJP state president B Y Vijayendra and BJP MLA Arvind Bellad opposed the move, alleging that the government was targetting Yaduveer Krishna Datta Chamaraja Wadiyar, the scion of the Mysuru royal family, and the BJP MP from Mysuru-Kodagu constituency out of political vendetta.
“We talk of 472 acres of Mysuru Maharaja but here there are many Maharajas who too own 400 acres, 500 acres and thousands of acres of land, which is known to everyone,” Bellad said.
He slammed the Congress government, saying political power should not be misused for personal vendetta.
“Why (the then Deputy Chief Minister) Siddaramaiah brought the law in 1996 pertaining to the Bangalore Palace? Why are you setting eyes on the Bangalore Palace?” he asked.
Vijayendra charged that Wadiyar won the election on BJP ticket so the state government realised that it should acquire it.
“This bill has been brought for political vengeance. We are not discussing whether Rs 3,000 crore is exorbitant or not but the moment Yaduveer became MP, the state government woke up. You should be ashamed. This house should not be used for political vendetta,” he said.
Intervening, Minister Priyank Kharge said Vijayendra should not have raised it because the intention behind building the road was noble.
According to him, the BJP too had the same plan when it was in power.
He sought to know whether thousands of crores of rupees be spent on a road which should have cost significantly less.
In response, BJP MLA B A Basavaraj (Byrathi) said issuing TDR will not be a burden on the state government and appealed to the ruling Congress to reconsider its stance.
Minister Ramalinga Reddy too explained that the Karnataka government acquired the entire land way back in 1996.
The Mysuru royal family went to the High Court, which gave ruling in favour of the state government. The royal family then approached the Supreme Court, where the case is still going on, the Minister pointed out.
“The final judgment is pending in the SC to decide whether the acquisition was right or wrong. If the SC says it’s the royal family’s property then let it be so. If the order is in the state government’s favour then we can take a decision. The bill is only about it,” Reddy explained.
Speaker U T Khader then called for a voice vote and the bill was passed by the Assembly amidst opposition BJP’s discontent.
