54-year old man who invested money in IMA for daughter's wedding dies of heart attack
Bengaluru: Abdul Pasha (54) one among the hundreds of investors in IMA Group of Companies’ alleged cheating and fraud case died of heart attack on Thursday even as Special Investigation Team (SIT) began its investigation into the matter.
A resident of old Guddahalli, Abdul Pasha had reportedly invested two lakh rupees in IMA along with three lakh rupees each of two of his children. His family had invested a total of eight lakh rupees in the company. He reportedly had invested the money to get the returns for the wedding of his daughter.
As the IMA fraud came to the fore and reports of its MD Mansoor Khan going underground came to light Pasha suffered heart attack and was rushed to Saptagiri hospital where he breathed his last on Thursday night.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Husband has to equally participate in household chores as he is not marrying a maid: SC
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Friday said a husband has to equally participate in household chores like cooking, cleaning and washing as he is not marrying a maid but a life partner.
The observations came from a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta which was hearing a petition filed by a man challenging an order of the Karnataka High Court.
The high court had set aside a trial court order granting divorce to the man on the ground of cruelty.
During the hearing before the apex court, the counsel appearing for the man said the mediation between the parties had failed.
He said the marriage between the parties took place in May 2017 and since 2019, the couple is separated.
ALSO READ: Four held for throwing non-veg food leftovers near temple
"I (man) want a divorce. The trial court granted a divorce on the ground of cruelty," the counsel said.
The bench asked what the cruelty was as alleged in the matter.
The counsel appearing for the man said the woman had indulged in improper behaviour and was not cooking food.
"You have to equally participate in all these. Cooking, cleaning, washing, everything. Today's times are different," Justice Nath observed, adding the high court was right that it might not be a ground for cruelty.
"You are not marrying a maid. You are marrying a life partner," Justice Mehta observed.
The bench was told that both of them were working in a government school.
"Call both parties physically. We would like to speak to them," the bench said.
It posted the matter for hearing on April 27 and asked both parties to remain present before it.
