Bengaluru: In another development in the IMA Group of Companies’ fraud case another voice clip allegedly of Mansoor Khan, the owner of the company has gone viral in which he can be heard promising investors to pay back their money by June 15.

In the audio, Mansoor blames Bengaluru Shivajinagar’s MLA R Roshan Baig for conspiring against him. He adds “Big shots including local MLA Roshan Baig are conspiring against me. They want me to flee from here but by the grace of Allah I am in Bengaluru with my family and I have not fled. There is a great conspiracy to against me. I have neither fled nor committed suicide, I am safe and in Bengaluru”.

He further adds that he has invested the money of investors in the form of properties, gold and diamonds and has account of it all. “I will sell of these assets and whatever I have and I will return the money of my investors by June 15. People can be assured and carefree about it” he adds.

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Friday said a husband has to equally participate in household chores like cooking, cleaning and washing as he is not marrying a maid but a life partner.

The observations came from a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta which was hearing a petition filed by a man challenging an order of the Karnataka High Court.

The high court had set aside a trial court order granting divorce to the man on the ground of cruelty.

During the hearing before the apex court, the counsel appearing for the man said the mediation between the parties had failed.

He said the marriage between the parties took place in May 2017 and since 2019, the couple is separated.

ALSO READ:  Four held for throwing non-veg food leftovers near temple

"I (man) want a divorce. The trial court granted a divorce on the ground of cruelty," the counsel said.

The bench asked what the cruelty was as alleged in the matter.

The counsel appearing for the man said the woman had indulged in improper behaviour and was not cooking food.

"You have to equally participate in all these. Cooking, cleaning, washing, everything. Today's times are different," Justice Nath observed, adding the high court was right that it might not be a ground for cruelty.

"You are not marrying a maid. You are marrying a life partner," Justice Mehta observed.

The bench was told that both of them were working in a government school.

"Call both parties physically. We would like to speak to them," the bench said.

It posted the matter for hearing on April 27 and asked both parties to remain present before it.