Bengaluru: People object to PM Modi’s campaign for candidate facing attempt to murder charges
Bengaluru: The propriety of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's road show in Bengaluru for BJP candidate N Chandra from Shivajinagar has come under question due to the candidate's criminal case of attempted murder. Chandra, who is facing charges of attacking Dr. UV Singh, former head of the Lokayukta investigation team and chief forest preservation officer of the Lake Development Authority during an investigation into illegal mining activities, had a case filed against him at the Amrutahalli Police Station in 2011. While his brother and uncle were arrested, Chandra was absconding and later granted bail.
On Saturday, Modi conducted a road show to campaign for Chandra, which has raised many eyebrows, with members of political parties and citizens questioning the propriety of the Prime Minister's decision. The Aam Aadmi Party's state president Mukund Gowda tweeted, citing Basavanna's lines referring to closeness, "Just as Basavanna stated, 'Iva Nammava, Iva Nammava' (He's ours), PM Modi too is attempting to show that every rogue, murderer, fraudster, and anti-social element is one of theirs."
Gowda went on to criticize the BJP for continuing to expand its foothold as a party centered around rowdyism, calling it unfortunate that the Prime Minister and senior leader of a national party stoops to such low levels. He also questioned whether the Prime Minister was completely in the dark about the matter, given that he had pretended to cancel his campaign rally when a long list of cases against the BJP candidate from Chittapura in Kalaburagi district was revealed.
Congress candidate Rizwan Arshad commented on the matter, saying, "The BJP is a party that depends on its theatrics. Every one of us is well aware who is on the side of the criminals - and the voters will display their awareness during elections."
The hearing of Chandra's case is pending in the 65th CCH Court. Many people in Bengaluru and members of political parties are questioning the propriety of the Prime Minister campaigning for a candidate who faces such serious charges.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Supreme Court rejects plea for reverting to ballots in elections
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a petition seeking to revert to ballot paper voting in elections in the country.
"What happens is, when you win the election, EVMs (electronic voting machine) are not tampered. When you lose the election, EVMs are tampered (with)," remarked a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and P B Varale.
Apart from ballot paper voting, the plea sought several directions including a directive to the Election Commission to disqualify candidates for a minimum of five years if found guilty of distributing money, liquor or other material inducement to the voters during polls.
When petitioner-in-person K A Paul said he filed the PIL, the bench said, "You have interesting PILs. How do you get these brilliant ideas?".
The petitioner said he is the president of an organisation which has rescued over three lakh orphans and 40 lakh widows.
"Why are you getting into this political arena? Your area of work is very different," the bench retorted.
After Paul revealed he had been to over 150 countries, the bench asked him whether each of the nations had ballot paper voting or used electronic voting.
The petitioner said foreign countries had adopted ballot paper voting and India should follow suit.
"Why you don't want to be different from the rest of the world?" asked the bench.
There was corruption and this year (2024) in June, the Election Commission announced they had seized Rs 9,000 crore, Paul responded.
"But how does that make your relief which you are claiming here relevant?" asked the bench, adding "if you shift back to physical ballot, will there be no corruption?".
Paul claimed CEO and co-founder of Tesla, Elon Musk, stated that EVMs could be tampered with and added TDP chief N Chandrababu Naidu, the current chief minister of Andhra Pradesh, and former state chief minister Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy had claimed EVMs could be tampered with.
"When Chandrababu Naidu lost, he said EVMs can be tampered with. Now this time, Jagan Mohan Reddy lost, he said EVMs can be tampered with," noted the bench.
When the petitioner said everybody knew money was distributed in elections, the bench remarked, "We never received any money for any elections."
The petitioner said another prayer in his plea was the formulation of a comprehensive framework to regulate the use of money and liquor during election campaigns and ensuring such practices were prohibited and punishable under the law.
The plea further sought a direction to mandate an extensive voter education campaign to raise awareness and importance of informed decision making.
"Today, 32 per cent educated people are not casting their votes. What a tragedy. If democracy will be dying like this and we will not be able to do anything then what will happen in the years to come in future," the petitioner said.
