Bengaluru, September 10: Bharat Bandh called by the Congress and its allies condemning the fuel price hike in the country on Monday was total and peaceful barring some stray incidents in the state.

Congress and BJP workers engaged in verbal duals in Hubballi, Udupi, Bagalkot and Uttara Kannada districts, miscreants pelted stones at KSRTC buses, agitators tried to lay siege the office of MP Prahlad Joshi, Vatal Nagaraj tried to ride buffalo, while MLC TA Shravan rode horse and police caned the agitators during the bandh on Monday.  

Schools and colleges were declared holiday. In some places, the agitators were seen forcefully closing down the fruits, vegetables and medical shops. In Bagalkot, the Congress workers tried to close the shops and other business establishments forcefully. The Congress workers who entered the market during the protest, force shut down the shops and asked the women who were selling fruits on the roadside to leave the place.

As the coalition partners Congress and JDS supported the bandh in the state, the administrative machinery was almost functionless. But the bandh did not have any impact on the proceedings of the courts. The High Court, City Civil Court and Magistrate Courts functioned as usual.

BMTC, KSRTC and Private buses, taxi cabs and autos were off the roads due to which, people suffered a lot at Majestic, KR Market, Shanti Nagar, Mysuru Road, Shivajinagar bus stations. In some places, auto drivers charged double amount than usual fare.

Though bus service started in some parts of the state in the morning, the agitators forcefully stopped the buses. Kannada Rakshana Vedike activists burnt tyres and blocked roads in Mysuru, Davangere, Hubballi, Hassan, Chikmagaluru and others parts, while Congress workers took out a huge protest march in Bengaluru. JDS workers took out protest march in bullock carts and burnt the effigy of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in several places.

Vatal rides buffalo

Kannada Chalavali Vatal Party president Vatal Nagaraj condemned the fuel price hike in a unique way by riding a buffalo at Majestic bus stand. Speaking on the occasion, Vatal Nagaraj said that more than 2,000 pro-Kannada organizations have supported the bandh. He has rode buffalo condemning the stand of the Narendra Modi government at the centre which failed to check the fuel price hike. The NDA government at the centre has failed on all fronts. If it failed to check the fuel price, people would certainly revolt against it, he warned.

“The state government should not increase the bus fare in the state. This bandh is not just against the central government, but also applies to the state government. We have decided to call for a bandh against fuel price hike. But as the Congress has given the bandh call, we have extended our support to the bandh”, he said.

Karnataka Rakshana Vedike led by its president Praveen Shetty took out a protest jatha to the Raj Bhavan condemning the fuel price hike. At Mekri Circle, the agitators pulled the car to protest the fuel price hike. But the police took the agitators who were marching towards Raj Bhavan from Mekri Circle, into custody near Palace Guttahalli.

Indira canteen functions

Though Bharat Bandh is successful across the state, the Indira canteens of the state government functioned as usual on Monday. As the hotels were closed, the general public were dependent on Indira canteens.

Rs 200 cr loss?

It is said that the state Exchequer has incurred a loss of Rs 200 crore in terms of tax collection due to Bharat Bandh. Apart from this, the entire state has incurred more than Rs 2,000 crore loss as the business transaction was stopped completely, it is estimated.

Bandh peaceful at Capital city

No untoward incidents were reported in the State Capital during the Bharat bandh on Monday. The bandh was peaceful. Protests were held at Mysore Bank Circle, Town Hall, Mourya Circle, Railway Station and other parts peacefully, according to City Police Commissioner T Sunil Kumar.

Tight security arrangements were made as a precautionary measure in the city. Additional police force of 15,000 including police commissioners and DCPs were deputed to monitor law and order situation across the city. Apart from this, 30 KSRTP platoons, 200 Hoysala vehicles were deployed for patrolling. The police have taken 14 persons who were misbehaving with the people at Chalukya Circle and 40 persons at Mekri Circle, into custody, Sunil Kumar said.

Protesters lay siege MP Joshi office

JDS activists laid siege the office of Hubballi-Dharwad Lok Sabha Member Prahlad Joshi and protested. Opposing this, the BJP workers staged a protest in front of the Hubballi Satellite Town Police station demanding arrest of JDS workers.

Bandh affects airport too

Bharat Bandh has affected the passengers at the Kempegowda International Airport in Bengaluru. Though the number of passengers coming to the airport was less, the number of foreign travelers was as usual.

The officials tried to send the passengers by Airport taxis. As some pro-Kannada organizations blocked the connecting roads to the airport and protested and the traffic congestion was more due to accidents, the passengers had to suffer a lot.

Modi’s pot of sins has filled to its brim

The pot of Narendra Modi’s ‘sins’ has filled to its brim. The NDA government is at the verge of collapse. They were ruling according to their whims and fancies. Because of this, the rupee value against the dollar was collapsed. The fuel prices were sky-rocketing. It was sure that the NDA would not retain power in the next Lok Sabha election. The people were disappointed because of false assurances of the BJP and they would dethrone Modi from the PM position.

-          M Mallikarjun Kharge, Congress leader in Lok Sabha

Prohibitory order at Udupi

Following clash between the Congress and BJP workers during the bandh, police security was beefed up across the Udupi city and clamped prohibitory orders under Section 144 in the City Municipal Council limits, according to an order from the tahsildar. He also warned against conducting any kinds of victory celebrations, or protests and possessing any weapons.

“Our party workers were peacefully protesting. But the police caned them. As a result, one person lost one of his fingers and four others were injured. This issue would be brought to the notice of the District Minister and the Home Minister. The incident would be discussed with the party leaders in the district. If the police caned the party workers without any reason, then the Congress would stage protest in front of the SP office”.

-   Vinay Kumar Sorake, former minister



 

 

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea seeking the review of its decision rejecting the petitions for confiscating Rs 16,518 crore received by political parties under the 2018 electoral bond scheme.

A bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra dismissed the review plea filed by one Khem Singh Bhati against the top court's decision of August 2, 2024.

The apex court had then rejected the petition seeking confiscation of money received under the scheme.

The bench on March 26 held, "The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of."

The top court's order, made available recently, also refused to accept Bhati's prayer for an open-court hearing in the matter.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by former CJI D Y Chandrachud on February 15 last year scrapped the electoral bonds scheme of anonymous political funding introduced by the BJP government.

Following the top court's judgement, the State Bank of India, the authorised financial institution under the scheme, shared the data with the election commission which made it public.

The electoral bonds scheme, which was notified by the government on January 2, 2018, was pitched as an alternative to cash donations made to political parties as part of its efforts to bring in transparency in political funding.

The top court, on August 2 last year, rejected a batch of pleas including the one filed by Bhati for a court-monitored probe into the electoral bonds scheme and observed it couldn't order a roving inquiry.

The review plea, filed through advocate Jayesh K Unnikrishnan and settled by senior advocate Vijay Hansaria, said on February 15, 2024 the apex court in Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) v. Union of India held the scheme unconstitutional for violating Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

"The effect of declaring the electoral bond scheme and the various statutory provisions as unconstitutional is that the said scheme never existed and is void ab-initio and it is a settled position of law that the court only finds law and it does not make law," it argued.

The verdict in the ADR case, the plea said, rendered the EBS void since inception, and therefore, the subsequent pleas seeking confiscation of the amount collected by political parties could not have been dismissed.

"In the absence of any declaration by this court in the ADR case that the judgement would apply prospectively, the existence of the electoral bond scheme on the date of purchase could not have been the basis for dismissal of the present writ petition. The scheme stood wiped out for all purposes from the date of inception and the necessary consequences must follow,” it added.

The plea said the previous bench's reliance on the existence of parliamentary legislation permitting electoral bonds to dismiss the writ petition constituted an "apparent error on the face of the record".

The ADR judgment did not declare its findings to be prospective, which means the statutory framework supporting electoral bonds should have been treated as invalid from the outset, it contended.

The applicant claimed the verdict had a retrospective effect, rendering the scheme null and void since its inception.

The review plea claimed the August 2, 2024 verdict "indirectly modified the ADR judgment".

The plea said evidence disclosed under court directions indicated a quid pro quo between donations made through the scheme and the benefits received by corporate donors, contradicting the bench's conclusion on the claims being speculative.

"Disclosure of information regarding electoral bonds in terms of the direction of this court clearly establish that there was quid pro quo between the donations made to the political parties and benefits received by the corporate houses and the observation...that the writ petition is based on assumption about quid pro quo between the donor and donee and the petitioner is seeking a roving inquiry, suffers from apparent error," it added.