Hassan: A video clip of BJP legislator Preetham Gowda stating recently that voting for the JD(S) would be like voting for the BJP has gone viral on social media.
Gowda, who had been addressing a night-time public meeting, is heard on video saying, “I am letting you know that you would be voting for the BJP if you vote for the JD(S).”
ALSO READ: JD(S) promises to restore 4 per cent reservation for Muslims in election manifesto
He has also said in the clip, “Former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda has already discussed related matters with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. As it is, we all know that the JD(S) would not get more than 25 seats in the Assembly elections this year.”
The video has piqued the curiosity of voters as the Home Minister and senior leader of the BJP Amit Shah said in Bagalkote recently, “Voting for the JD(S) means voting for the Congress,” and also asked the voters to consciously vote for the BJP.”
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
New Delhi, Apr 8 (PTI): The Centre on Tuesday filed a caveat in the Supreme Court and sought a hearing before any order was passed on the pleas challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.
Caveat is filed by a party in the high courts and the apex court to ensure that no orders are passed without hearing it.
Over 10 petitions, including those by politicians and the All India Muslim Personal Law Board and Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, were filed in the top court challenging the validity of the newly-enacted law.
Lawyers privy to the development said the petitions were likely to be listed for hearing before a bench on April 15 though it is not reflected on the apex court website as of now.
On April 7, a bench headed by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna assured senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, to consider listing the petitions.
President Droupadi Murmu on April 5 gave her assent to the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which was passed by Parliament after heated debates in both houses.