Businessmen who do not do as Centre asks of them are harassed by IT, ED: Priyank Kharge
Bengaluru: Rural Development and IT-BT Minister Priyank Kharge has alleged that businesspersons who do not fall in line with the central government are being deliberately harassed through agencies such as the Income Tax Department, the Enforcement Directorate (ED), and the Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities.
Speaking to reporters in Bengaluru on Saturday in connection with the suicide of businessman C.J. Roy, Kharge said that for the past ten years, central agencies have been used as tools to target entrepreneurs who refuse to follow the diktats of the Union government.
“There are several examples of businesspersons being subjected to harassment by the ED, IT and GST departments if they do not toe the Centre’s line. But such action is never seen against industrialists like Ambani and Adani,” Kharge alleged. He claimed that instead of scrutiny, the government changes policies to favour and expand the businesses of select corporate groups.
Referring to the death of C.J. Roy, the minister said the incident shows the extent of pressure faced by businesspersons. “If a businessman is driven to suicide, one can imagine the level of harassment involved. This is not limited to industrialists alone; even ordinary citizens are facing similar trouble,” he said.
Kharge further stated that the allegation of harassment was not being made by him alone but by the family of the deceased businessman. He demanded a thorough investigation into the matter to ascertain the role of central agencies and ensure accountability.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Environment ministry endorses names of 10-member expert committee set up to define Aravalli hills
New Delhi (PTI): The Union Environment Ministry has told the Supreme Court that it has no objection with the Central Empowered Committee's proposed 10-member high-powered expert committee which has been tasked to come up with a uniform definition for the Aravalli hills and ranges.
In an affidavit filed before the top court, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has endorsed the names suggested for the high-powered expert committee comprising in-service and retired bureaucrats associated with the Forest Survey of India (FSI), Geological Survey of India (GSI) and Survey of India, along with academicians.
"The MoEFCC respectfully submits that it has no objection if this court as the aforesaid suggested names for the constitution of the proposed High Powered Committee. It is further submitted that the Ministry does not have any additional names to propose at this stage for inclusion in the said committee," the affidavit said.
The committee is proposed to be headed by Kanchan Devi, the current director general of the Indian Council of Forestry Research & Education.
The MoEF, in its affidavit, said the aspects relating to the Aravalli Hills and Ranges require a comprehensive and analytical examination, including stakeholder consultation, by a group of domain experts in the relevant fields.
The CEC in its report to the apex court said Devi, a 1991 Indian Forest Service officer from the Madhya Pradesh cadre, has over three decades of experience in forestry education and research, wildlife and forest policy, and institutional leadership.
The other members include Subhash Ashutosh, former director general of FSI,
former GSI director Rajendra Kumar Sharma, climate and energy policy expert Tejal Kanitkar, senior academician and life sciences researcher Jaya Parkash Yadav, senior geographer and scholar Tejbir Singh Rana, former additional surveyor general of India SV Singh, former Gujarat principal chief conservator of forests CN Pandey, and former Nagaland PCCF Dharmendra Prakash.
The CEC also recommended names of RN Mishra, a noted author and Vijay Dhasmana, an ecological restoration practitioner and conservationist.
On February 26, the top court had asked the environment ministry and other stakeholders to suggest names of domain experts for the panel which would define the Aravalli hills and ranges, and observed that only lawful mining would be allowed in the region.
The top court, on December 29, took note of the outcry over the new definition of the Aravallis and kept in abeyance its November 20 directions that accepted a uniform definition of these hills and ranges. It had also stalled all mining activities.
It remarked that there was a need to resolve "critical ambiguities", including whether the criteria of 100-metre elevation and the 500-metre gap between hills would strip a significant portion of the range of environmental protection.
