Bengaluru: Former chief minister H D Kumaraswamy has raised objection for the examinations of the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) being conducted only in English and Hindi, without an option to answer in regional languages, including Kannada.

He posted a series of tweets on Friday that the Central government is desperate to curb the regional languages especially in South India. “There seems to be sheer intolerance and even hatred towards the regional languages. There also seems to be a determination to destroy the three-language policy,” he has expressed ire in the matter.

Pointing out that the 20,000 selected candidates may be posted in any state, Kumaraswamy opined that an attempt was being made to ‘fill Karnataka and other South Indian states with Hindi people’.

He said that Karnataka representatives had two demands in the matter. “The SSC examinations should be conducted in Kannada too. The posts in Karnataka should be reserved for Kannadigas. The Commission should conduct the examinations only after implementing the changes,” the former chief minister demanded.

Kumaraswamy further said, “Conducting the examination in Kannada will benefit many worthy candidates in the state. Also, if Kannadigas are appointed for the posts in the state, the citizens will get service in Kannada,” and warned, “If the Centre fails to bring in the change, it will have to face the displeasure and pressure from Kannadigas.” 

 

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



Chennai: Journalist and political commentator Sujit Nair has expressed concern over speculation that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam could explore a post-poll understanding to prevent Vijay-led Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam from forming the government in Tamil Nadu.

In a social media post, Sujit Nair said the election verdict in Tamil Nadu reflected a clear public demand for political change and argued that the mandate should be respected irrespective of political preferences.

Referring to reports and political discussions surrounding a possible understanding between the DMK and AIADMK, he said he hoped such developments remained only speculative conversations and did not turn into reality.

Nair stated that if such an alliance were to take shape, it would raise serious questions about ideological politics in the country. He said TVK had emerged through a democratic electoral process and that the legitimacy to govern in a parliamentary democracy comes from the people’s verdict.

According to him, attempts to prevent an electoral winner from forming the government through unexpected political arrangements may be constitutionally valid, but many people could view them as politically opportunistic.

He further said that such a move could particularly affect the political image of the DMK, which has historically projected itself around ideology, social justice and opposition politics. Nair said that in ideological terms, the DMK appeared closer to TVK than to the AIADMK, and joining hands with its long-time political rival only to remain in power could weaken its broader political narrative.

He added that the same questions would apply to the AIADMK as well, as the party had spent decades positioning itself against the DMK and such an arrangement could create discomfort among its cadre and supporters.

Drawing a comparison with Maharashtra politics in 2019, Nair said he had expressed similar views when the Shiv Sena formed an alliance with the Indian National Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party after the Assembly elections.

He said post-poll alliances between long-standing political rivals often create a public perception that ideology and electoral mandates become secondary when political power equations come into play.

Nair also said such developments increase public cynicism towards politics and reinforce the belief among voters that ideology is often sidelined after elections.

He maintained that the Tamil Nadu verdict was emphatic and said respecting both the spirit and substance of the mandate was important for the credibility of democratic politics.