GST on petroleum products not on agenda: Sushil Modi
BENGALURU: Bihar finance minister and chairperson of GST Group of Ministers (GoM) for technology, Sushil Kumar Modi on Saturday said that levying taxes on petroleum products was not on the agenda of the GST council and even if that happens people should not wrongly perceive that GST can control taxes on petrol and diesel.
Speaking to reporters after a GoM meeting here, Modi, while reiterating that petroleum products are already under GST and that only the date to start levying taxes must be fixed, said: "The GST council is meeting on September 28. But I don't think this is on the agenda as the Centre and several states feel that the immediate need is to stabilise revenue and increase compliance. Taxing petrol and diesel under GST will only be considered thereafter."
He also warned people not to believe that GST would control the taxes on petrol and diesel and reduce their burden with a fixed tax component. "...Even if you bring them under GST, you cannot control what the states or the Centre levies as taxes. There is a provision for both of them to levy taxes over and above GST, which is provided based on global practices. With this, both states as well as the Centre can levy additional taxes even after GST is levied," he said.
Arguing that it is not an opportune moment to begin taxing motor fuels and other petroleum products under GST now, he said that presently states and the Centre together levy about 50 per cent tax on petrol and diesel. "They will first want revenue
stabilisation."
He also gave an overview of the progress made so far in terms of the number of taxpayers, e-Way bill generation, tax collection et al.
GST in numbers
* 15.71 crore: Total number of returns filed under GST so far
* 5.35 crore: Total number of payment transactions made under GST so far
* 62.9 lakh: The number old migrated taxpayers under GST
* 50.6 lakh: The number of new approved registered taxpayers under GST
* Rs 93,960 crore: GST collections for the month of July
* 23.61 crore: Total number of e-Way Bills issued so far
* 48%: Percentage of e-Way Bills generated for inter-state transport of goods
* 52%: Percentage of e-Way Bills generated for intrastate transport of goods
* 99.08%: Percentage of goods transported by road
* 8.65 lakh: The number of verifications of e-Ways bills carried out in the country
* 3,588: The number of inspections reports on goods transport filed in the country
Annual returns & new form
Modi said that Infosys has been directed to ready the forms required for the filing of annual returns-which will be done for the first time since the inception of GST-by November 15. "December 31 will be the last date to file annual returns and all those dealers with a turnover of more than Rs 2 crore will also be required to file an audit report by the same date," he said, adding that the new, simplified return forms have been finalised by the GSTN. Stating that the new forms should be ready for people to use in the next few months, Modi said that all dealers with a turnover of less than Rs 5 crore or up to Rs 5 crore can file quarterly returns. "More than 92 per cent of all dealers fall in this category. Moreover, two systems 'Sahaj'- for all those dealers dealing only with customers and 'Sugam'- for those dealing with customers and also other businesses are ready for use. They will be launched soon," he said. While the returns can be filed quarterly, dealers will have to continue paying taxes every month. He also said that all those who have not filed GSTR-1 for the month of July can now do it without a late fee. "The time has been extended up to October 31 and we've recommended to the GST council that there be provisions for this," he said.
Tax on e-commerce
Modi said that the levy of taxes on e-commerce will begin from October 1 and that most states are ready with the software and requisite training for their staff. "It won't increase revenue immediately, but it will surely have a positive impact in the long term," he said.
He further added that 18 firms have been shortlisted for the development of a 'common accounting software' by the GSTN and that small traders will soon be able to get this for their use.
Audit to probe revenue shortfall in states
Sushil Modi said that the GSTN will conduct an audit to find out why some of the states-four main ones: Bihar, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Uttarakhand-have been facing huge revenue shortfall, in the range of 20 to 42 per cent. "
(Mr) Hasmukh Adhia has been visiting these states, he was in Bihar just yesterday. And, prima facie, it appears like the taxes from the service sector is not reflecting. So the DG-audit will be conducting an audit into the banks, railways, airlines and telecom sectors to see if the 'place of supply' rules are accurate in their softwares," he said, adding that they do not suspect any large scale evasion.
He also said that the issue of shortfall is being addressed by the Centre and the states and that it has come down from 17% earlier to about 13 per cent now. "In some states like Maharashtra, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu it is below 3 per cent," he said, adding that states like Bihar, which are under the special category also have a lot of money stuck in the IGST.
Exporters' refund
Answering a specific question, AB Pandey, chairman, GSTN, said that processing and settlement of refunds for the exporters, which has been a pain point, has been going on smoothly and that so far, Rs 43,000 crore has been settled.
So far as the e-wallet facility for exporters is concerned, Modi said that the GSTN has decided that it needs more deliberation in terms of its implementation.
Courtesy: timesofindia
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Single higher education regulator bill tabled in LS; Oppn flags ‘centralisation,' JPC likely
New Delhi: A bill to set up a 13-member body to regulate institutions of higher education was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Monday.
Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan introduced the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, which seeks to establish an overarching higher education commission along with three councils for regulation, accreditation, and ensuring academic standards for universities and higher education institutions in India.
Meanwhile, the move drew strong opposition, with members warning that it could weaken institutional autonomy and result in excessive centralisation of higher education in India.
The Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan Bill, 2025, earlier known as the Higher Education Council of India (HECI) Bill, has been introduced in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
The proposed legislation seeks to merge three existing regulatory bodies, the University Grants Commission (UGC), the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE), and the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), into a single unified body called the Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan.
At present, the UGC regulates non-technical higher education institutions, the AICTE oversees technical education, and the NCTE governs teacher education in India.
Under the proposed framework, the new commission will function through three separate councils responsible for regulation, accreditation, and the maintenance of academic standards across universities and higher education institutions in the country.
According to the Bill, the present challenges faced by higher educational institutions due to the multiplicity of regulators having non-harmonised regulatory approval protocols will be done away with.
The higher education commission, which will be headed by a chairperson appointed by the President of India, will cover all central universities and colleges under it, institutes of national importance functioning under the administrative purview of the Ministry of Education, including IITs, NITs, IISc, IISERs, IIMs, and IIITs.
At present, IITs and IIMs are not regulated by the University Grants Commission (UGC).
Government to refer bill to JPC; Oppn slams it
The government has expressed its willingness to refer it to a joint committee after several members of the Lok Sabha expressed strong opposition to the Bill, stating that they were not given time to study its provisions.
Responding to the opposition, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the government intends to refer the Bill to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for detailed examination.
Congress Lok Sabha MP Manish Tewari warned that the Bill could result in “excessive centralisation” of higher education. He argued that the proposed law violates the constitutional division of legislative powers between the Union and the states.
According to him, the Bill goes beyond setting academic standards and intrudes into areas such as administration, affiliation, and the establishment and closure of university campuses. These matters, he said, fall under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List and Entry 32 of the State List, which cover the incorporation and regulation of state universities.
Tewari further stated that the Bill suffers from “excessive delegation of legislative power” to the proposed commission. He pointed out that crucial aspects such as accreditation frameworks, degree-granting powers, penalties, institutional autonomy, and even the supersession of institutions are left to be decided through rules, regulations, and executive directions. He argued that this amounts to a violation of established constitutional principles governing delegated legislation.
Under the Bill, the regulatory council will have the power to impose heavy penalties on higher education institutions for violating provisions of the Act or related rules. Penalties range from ₹10 lakh to ₹75 lakh for repeated violations, while establishing an institution without approval from the commission or the state government could attract a fine of up to ₹2 crore.
Concerns were also raised by members from southern states over the Hindi nomenclature of the Bill. N.K. Premachandran, an MP from the Revolutionary Socialist Party representing Kollam in Kerala, said even the name of the Bill was difficult to pronounce.
He pointed out that under Article 348 of the Constitution, the text of any Bill introduced in Parliament must be in English unless Parliament decides otherwise.
DMK MP T.M. Selvaganapathy also criticised the government for naming laws and schemes only in Hindi. He said the Constitution clearly mandates that the nomenclature of a Bill should be in English so that citizens across the country can understand its intent.
Congress MP S. Jothimani from Tamil Nadu’s Karur constituency described the Bill as another attempt to impose Hindi and termed it “an attack on federalism.”
_vb_22.jpeg)
