Husband must continue maintenance payments despite unemployment: Karnataka High Court
Bengaluru: In a recent ruling, the High Court has said that a husband cannot evade the responsibility of providing maintenance to his divorced wife and child simply because he is currently unemployed. The decision came following a petition filed by an individual seeking to overturn the order of the Belagavi Family Court.
The petitioner, citing his unemployment as the reason for inability to pay maintenance, appealed to set aside the family court's order. However, the High Court, led by Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum, rejected this argument, asserting that the husband remains obligated to support his former spouse and minor child even after separation.
Acknowledging the economic challenges posed by inflation, the court upheld the family court's decision to grant interim relief, ordering the husband to pay Rs 7,000 for the wife and Rs 3,000 for the minor child per month, considering the cost of living in Belagavi city.
Despite the petitioner's loss of employment at the time of divorce, the court took into account the petitioner's family assets, including a commercial complex.
Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the reasonableness of the maintenance order issued by the family court.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
MUDA case: Karnataka HC adjourns hearing till Dec 10
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday adjourned till December 10 the hearing on the plea seeking transfer of the investigation into the MUDA site allotment scam to the CBI. The plea was filed by activist Snehamayi Krishna doubting the credibility of Lokayukta investigation into the matter.
The petitioner told PTI that he approached the HC saying he has no faith in the Lokayukta police and hence the case should be handed over to the CBI.
In the MUDA case, it is alleged that compensatory sites were allotted to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's wife in an upmarket area in Mysuru, which had higher property value as compared to the location of her land which had been "acquired" by the MUDA.
The MUDA had allotted plots to Parvathi under a 50:50 ratio scheme in lieu of 3.16 acres of her land, where it developed a residential layout.
Under the controversial scheme, MUDA allotted 50 per cent of developed land to the land losers in lieu of undeveloped land acquired from them for forming residential layouts. It is alleged that Parvathi had no legal title over this 3.16 acres of land at survey number 464 of Kasare village, Kasaba hobli of Mysuru taluk.
The Karnataka Lokayukta police and the Enforcement Directorate have launched an investigation into the 'scam'.
The CM has denied any wrongdoing in the alleged scam.
