Bengaluru: In a recent ruling, the High Court has said that a husband cannot evade the responsibility of providing maintenance to his divorced wife and child simply because he is currently unemployed. The decision came following a petition filed by an individual seeking to overturn the order of the Belagavi Family Court.
The petitioner, citing his unemployment as the reason for inability to pay maintenance, appealed to set aside the family court's order. However, the High Court, led by Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum, rejected this argument, asserting that the husband remains obligated to support his former spouse and minor child even after separation.
Acknowledging the economic challenges posed by inflation, the court upheld the family court's decision to grant interim relief, ordering the husband to pay Rs 7,000 for the wife and Rs 3,000 for the minor child per month, considering the cost of living in Belagavi city.
Despite the petitioner's loss of employment at the time of divorce, the court took into account the petitioner's family assets, including a commercial complex.
Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the reasonableness of the maintenance order issued by the family court.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Washington DC: The White House has reportedly ruled out the use of nuclear weapons against Iran, even as uncertainty continues over ongoing peace negotiations and a deadline set by US President Donald Trump approaches.
Issues bout a possible escalation had increased after US Vice President JD Vance said that the United States has “tools in our toolkit that we so far haven’t decided to use” in dealing with Iran.
His remarks came amid rising tensions and ahead of a deadline linked to peace efforts.
The situation has attracted attention as Trump warned Iran that its “whole civilization will die tonight tonight” if an agreement is not reached by Tuesday at 8 pm.
This statement led to speculation about the possibility of extreme military measures, including a nuclear strike.
Following Vance’s comments, the White House issued a clarification distancing itself from such interpretations. In a post on X, it said, "Literally nothing @VP said here 'implies' this, you absolute buffoons." In a later statement, it added that “only the president knows” what action will be taken regarding Iran.
Literally nothing @VP said here "implies" this, you absolute buffoons https://t.co/7JU3wXMaWX
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) April 7, 2026
