Belagavi (PTI): The Karnataka Legislative Assembly here on Monday witnessed noisy scenes on the first day of the winter session over Waqf issue with the opposition BJP demanding immediate discussion on it.
After the obituary reference, when Speaker U T Khader wanted to make a mention of the unveiling a large painting of the 'Anubhava Mantapa', at Suvarna Vidhana Soudha here, Leader of Opposition R Ashoka along with few BJP MLAs demanded that discussion on Waqf issue, based on their adjournment notice be taken up first.
Anubhava Mantapa is a 12th century spiritual centre in Basavakalyan led by social reformer Basavanna and others, where discussions on contemporary social and political issues took place.
Ashoka said, "You are talking about Anubhava Mantapa here, while several temples of Basavanna have all become Waqf property."
As BJP leaders tried to raise the issue, despite the Speaker stating that he would allow them to raise it later, the ruling Congress members objected to it, resulting in chaos.
"Waqf land issues have mostly happened during the BJP rule, we will bring out things," Revenue Minister Krishna Byre Gowda said.
He said the opposition BJP don't want discussion. They want to do politics and waste the time of the House. The government was ready for discussion when the Chair allows.
Minister Sharan Praksah Patil said the BJP and RSS are opponents of the 12th century social reformer Basavanna and his principles. This angered BJP members, and they vehemently pushed for discussion on the Waqf issue. "At least allow me to make a preliminary submission based on my adjournment notice," Ashoka said.
There have been allegations by a section of farmers from Vijayapura district that their lands were marked as Waqf properties. Similar charges have surfaced from a few other places subsequently, and also by some organisations and religious institutions like Maths.
With the row escalating, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah had recently directed officials that all notices issued to farmers be immediately revoked, and any unauthorised amendments in land records without due notice must also be nullified. However, BJP has been holding state wide protests targeting the government on the issue.
The Speaker said the government is ready for discussion on the Waqf issue and he would allow it after the question hour, citing rules. However, BJP members did not budge, and continued their demand for discussion on the Waqf issue.
In between, some BJP MLAs led by Basangouda Patil Yatnal alleged that the Belagavi district administration has put restrictions on a protest planned by the Panchamasali Lingayat community tomorrow.
Seeking to know why restrictions had been imposed on the protest by a community, they asked "can no one raise their voice against this government?"
Despite this, the Speaker continued to read a statement regarding unveiling of Anubhava Mantapa painting at the Suvarna Vidhana Soudha premises, and later allowed Law Minister H K Patil, who complemented the chair for such an initiative. This angered Yatnal and a few BJP members, who trooped into the well of the house seeking the chief minister's answer regarding imposing restrictions on Panchamasali Lingayats protest tomorrow.
Some BJP members even shouted, "this is a Hitler government." This led to heated arguments between treasury and opposition benches, following which the Speaker adjourned the House for lunch.
The Panchamasali Lingayat community wants to be included in category 2A (15 per cent) of OBC reservation matrix. They are currently included under 3B (5 per cent), according to its leaders.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Prayagraj (PTI): The Allahabad High Court has expressed dissatisfaction over the investigation and state's evidence in a 2009 custodial death case in Mainpuri district of Uttar Pradesh.
A bench of justices Atul Sreedharan and Siddhartha Nandan warned that if relevant videography and photographs are not placed before the court, the only option left to it will be to take assistance of CBI to recover the vital evidence.
The order was passed while hearing a PIL filed by Association for Advocacy and Legal Initiatives.
The court, in its order dated April 7, noted that crucial facts including video and photo evidence of the incident are missing.
The court observed, "In the event, by the next date of hearing, the videography and photographs relevant in this case are not placed before this court, the only other option left to this court is to take assistance of the central bureau of investigation (CBI) to recover vital evidence in this case which shall be considered on the next date of hearing."
"The chain of evidence is unclear casting doubt on the fairness of the investigation," the court added.
The court also directed the then sub-divisional magistrate (SDM) Karmendra Singh of Mainpuri to file his affidavit strictly in terms of the order dated February 9, failing which, it said, it shall consider to take appropriate action against him.
The court asked Singh to give a precise answer on the fate of the videography recording which was done in his presence.
The court fixed May 5 as the next date of hearing in the matter.
