Karnataka govt's guarantee schemes ease financial burden, empower women: Study
Bengaluru: A year-long independent study has found that the Karnataka government’s five guarantee schemes have significantly empowered women, particularly from low-income households, by easing financial stress and improving household well-being.
The survey, led by independent policy consultant Tara Krishnaswamy in collaboration with Lokniti-CSDS, Bangalore University, Tumkur University, and Indus Action, covered approximately 6,300 women across 15 districts in Karnataka. According to the study, as cited by The Hindu, 84% of respondents reported that the schemes reduced their families’ financial burden, while 89% felt that the guarantees contributed to their financial upliftment.
Improved nutrition, health, and independence
The study highlights how beneficiaries are utilising the monetary benefits and savings from the schemes. Around 91% of respondents said they used the funds to purchase food and dietary essentials such as grains, vegetables, fruits, pulses, eggs, and meat.
Nearly 95% of the women stated that their families ingested better nutrition and improved diets due to the benefits, while 90% reported increased access to healthcare.
Additionally, over 80% of women noted improvements in their personal health, nutrition, and financial security. More than 50% of respondents also indicated they had resumed or continued their education due to the support received.
Economic and social empowerment
According to the study, the direct benefit of Rs 2,000 per month through the Gruha Lakshmi scheme played a key role, while additional savings came from Gruha Jyoti, which helped over 90% of women save up to Rs 1,000 per month on electricity bills. The Shakti scheme enabled up to Rs 1,000 in weekly savings. Notably, 27% of respondents reported using savings from the five guarantees to repay loans.
The Shakti scheme also contributed to greater mobility and independence, with 67% of women travelling independently for work or leisure. About 19% were able to secure new or better-paying jobs due to free transportation.
Other guarantees also made an impact: Anna Bhagya improved household diets, Gruha Jyoti reduced electricity costs for 82% of families, and Yuva Nidhi supported skill development among unemployed youth, though the latter had a limited reach, benefiting just 7% of respondents.
“These schemes are a social safety net. The money is not sitting idle somewhere. Whether it is money received through Gruha Lakshmi or any savings that they have because of these schemes, it is all being spent mainly on food, nutrition and health,” The Hindu quoted Krishnaswamy as saying.
Challenges and recommendations
Despite the positive outcomes, the study also identified several challenges, including delays in benefit distribution, administrative hurdles, and technological barriers. It noted that many women beneficiaries have only basic education (up to the 10th standard or less) and often struggle with mobile apps, portals, ATMs, or even reading electricity bills.
The study recommends boosting financial and digital literacy through local panchayats to help bridge these gaps.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
'Someone must be held accountable': HC converts civil suit on Goa nightclub tragedy into PIL
Panaji (PTI): The Bombay High Court on Monday converted a civil suit against Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub into a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) saying "someone has to be held accountable" for the tragedy in which 25 people were killed.In a stern observation, Goa bench of the High Court of Justices Sarang Kotwal and Ashish Chavan said the local panchayat had "failed to take suo motu cognisance" of the club and had taken "no action despite complaints."
The division bench directed the Goa government to file a detailed reply on the permissions granted to the nightclub.
The High Court, while fixing January 8 as the next date of hearing, pointed out that commercial operations were continuing in the structure despite it having been served a demolition order.
The original petition was filed after the December 6 tragedy by Pradeep Ghadi Amonkar and Sunil Divkar, the owners of the land on which the nightclub was operating.
ALSO READ: Veteran Congress leader Shamanuru Shivashankarappa laid to rest with full state honours
Advocate Rohit Bras de Sa, the lawyer representing the petitioner, was made amicus curiae in the matter and has been asked to file a detailed affidavit in the matter.
In their petition, Amonkar and Divkar highlighted "the alarming pattern of statutory violations that have remained inadequately addressed despite multiple complaints, inspections, show-cause notices, and even a demolition order".
They contended that these violations posed "immediate threats to public safety, ecological integrity, and the rule of law in the state of Goa."
Investigations by multiple agencies into the nightclub fire have revealed various irregularities, including lack of permissions to operate the nightclub.
The Goa police arrested five managers and staff members of the club, while co-owners Gaurav Luthra and Saurabh Luthra have been detained in Thailand after they fled the country.
