Karnataka High Court reserves order on state’s plea against stay on ban of public gatherings without
Bengaluru/Dharwad: The Karnataka High Court has reserved its order on the state government’s appeal challenging the interim stay granted against its directive that prohibits gatherings of more than 10 people in public places without prior permission from competent authorities.
The order in question, issued by the state government on October 18, 2025, sought to restrict any assembly, including those organised by private groups such as the RSS, in public areas like roads, parks, and playgrounds without prior approval. The Dharwad bench of the High Court, through a single-judge bench on October 28, had issued an interim stay on the order.
Hearing the government’s appeal on Tuesday, a division bench comprising Justice S.G. Pandit and Justice K.B. Geetha concluded arguments and reserved its decision.
Advocate General K. Shashikiran Shetty, representing the state government, argued that the notification was a lawful and reasonable measure intended to protect public property and citizens’ rights. He stated that gatherings of more than 10 people in public places such as roads and playgrounds without permission could disrupt public movement and order, and hence were declared unlawful under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Shetty contended that the single-judge bench’s interim order curtailed the government’s authority over its property. “Private organisations cannot use government property at their will. The order does not restrict people from using parks for walks; it only requires prior permission for organized events such as lectures or gatherings. There is nothing unreasonable about this,” he said.
He further noted that if any organisation sought permission, it would be granted within three days as per the new guidelines. “The order was issued solely to protect government property,” Shetty asserted.
The division bench questioned whether the government could have approached the single-judge bench itself for vacating the interim stay. Responding, the Advocate General said that since the stay order was already granted, the appropriate remedy was to approach a higher bench.
Senior Advocate Ashok Haranahalli, appearing for the original petitioners from Punashchetana Seva Trust, argued that the government’s view of public spaces as its exclusive property was legally flawed. “The state cannot claim ownership over playgrounds and parks in a manner that denies public access. Citizens have the right to use these spaces,” he said.
He further questioned, “If a group wishes to play cricket in a playground, must they seek daily permission from the government? Article 19(1)(b) of the Constitution guarantees the right to assemble peacefully without arms. This order amounts to an unreasonable restriction on that fundamental right.”
Haranahalli maintained that various provisions under criminal law already exist to curb unlawful assemblies and that municipal authorities, not the state government, are empowered to regulate the use of local public spaces. “If the state wants to impose such restrictions, it must enact legislation rather than issue an executive order that curtails citizens’ rights,” he argued.
On October 28, Justice M. Nagaprasanna of the single-judge bench had granted an interim stay on the state’s order, observing that the government directive prima facie infringed upon the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Constitution, the rights to free speech and peaceful assembly.
The bench had held that fundamental rights cannot be curtailed by an executive order but only by a valid law enacted under constitutional provisions. “If such an order is allowed to stand, it would effectively deprive citizens of their basic freedoms,” the court had observed.
Invoking Article 13(2) of the Constitution, which prohibits the state from making any law that abridges fundamental rights, the bench had stayed the implementation of the October 18 government order and subsequent directives until further hearing.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Indigo flights chaos: SCR to run special trains to clear passenger rush
Hyderabad (PTI): The South Central Railway on Saturday announced that it would run four special trains to manage the surge in passengers resulting from the large-scale cancellation of IndiGo flights here.
The move comes as flyers face significant disruption and long queues at the airport due to the cancellation.
A press release from the SCR said it is running the special trains to clear the extra rush of passengers to Chennai, Mumbai and Shalimar (Kolkata) from Hyderabad today.
Meanwhile, as many as 43 outbound Indigo flights were cancelled from here on Saturday, Rajiv Gandhi International Airport sources said.
Similarly, 26 incoming flights are also likely to be cancelled during the day, they said.
The flight cancellations drew ire from passengers, who thronged the IndiGo counters at the airport demanding to know the exact situation.
“This is utter nonsense! Digiyatra done, message received that departure has been rescheduled ahead of the scheduled departure and now upon arriving at Hyderabad airport coming to know at the security checkpoint that Indigo flight is cancelled,” Tarun Singha, former Ministry of Defence spokesperson said in a post on X.
“But the thing is if you don’t shout they do nothing. Example at Hyderabad Airport, there was no staff no flight information for an hour. Then a fellow passenger started shouting on mic and an Indigo staff appeared finally,” a netizen said in a post.
On Friday, when IndiGo cancelled over 1,000 flights from across airports, its CEO Pieter Elbers apologised in a video message for the major inconvenience caused to passengers due to the disruptions.
In the one-way video communication, Elbers also said that the airline was expecting fewer than 1,000 flights on Saturday.
