Karnataka High Court reserves order on state’s plea against stay on ban of public gatherings without
Bengaluru/Dharwad: The Karnataka High Court has reserved its order on the state government’s appeal challenging the interim stay granted against its directive that prohibits gatherings of more than 10 people in public places without prior permission from competent authorities.
The order in question, issued by the state government on October 18, 2025, sought to restrict any assembly, including those organised by private groups such as the RSS, in public areas like roads, parks, and playgrounds without prior approval. The Dharwad bench of the High Court, through a single-judge bench on October 28, had issued an interim stay on the order.
Hearing the government’s appeal on Tuesday, a division bench comprising Justice S.G. Pandit and Justice K.B. Geetha concluded arguments and reserved its decision.
Advocate General K. Shashikiran Shetty, representing the state government, argued that the notification was a lawful and reasonable measure intended to protect public property and citizens’ rights. He stated that gatherings of more than 10 people in public places such as roads and playgrounds without permission could disrupt public movement and order, and hence were declared unlawful under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Shetty contended that the single-judge bench’s interim order curtailed the government’s authority over its property. “Private organisations cannot use government property at their will. The order does not restrict people from using parks for walks; it only requires prior permission for organized events such as lectures or gatherings. There is nothing unreasonable about this,” he said.
He further noted that if any organisation sought permission, it would be granted within three days as per the new guidelines. “The order was issued solely to protect government property,” Shetty asserted.
The division bench questioned whether the government could have approached the single-judge bench itself for vacating the interim stay. Responding, the Advocate General said that since the stay order was already granted, the appropriate remedy was to approach a higher bench.
Senior Advocate Ashok Haranahalli, appearing for the original petitioners from Punashchetana Seva Trust, argued that the government’s view of public spaces as its exclusive property was legally flawed. “The state cannot claim ownership over playgrounds and parks in a manner that denies public access. Citizens have the right to use these spaces,” he said.
He further questioned, “If a group wishes to play cricket in a playground, must they seek daily permission from the government? Article 19(1)(b) of the Constitution guarantees the right to assemble peacefully without arms. This order amounts to an unreasonable restriction on that fundamental right.”
Haranahalli maintained that various provisions under criminal law already exist to curb unlawful assemblies and that municipal authorities, not the state government, are empowered to regulate the use of local public spaces. “If the state wants to impose such restrictions, it must enact legislation rather than issue an executive order that curtails citizens’ rights,” he argued.
On October 28, Justice M. Nagaprasanna of the single-judge bench had granted an interim stay on the state’s order, observing that the government directive prima facie infringed upon the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Constitution, the rights to free speech and peaceful assembly.
The bench had held that fundamental rights cannot be curtailed by an executive order but only by a valid law enacted under constitutional provisions. “If such an order is allowed to stand, it would effectively deprive citizens of their basic freedoms,” the court had observed.
Invoking Article 13(2) of the Constitution, which prohibits the state from making any law that abridges fundamental rights, the bench had stayed the implementation of the October 18 government order and subsequent directives until further hearing.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Screenwriter Salim Khan on ventilator support and stable, say doctors
Mumbai (PTI): Veteran screenwriter Salim Khan suffered a brain haemorrhage which has been tackled, is on ventilator support as a safeguard and stable, doctors treating him said on Wednesday, a day after he was admitted to the Lilavati Hospital here.
The 90-year-old, one half of the celebrated Salim-Javed duo which scripted films such as "Sholay", "Deewar" and "Don" with Javed Akhtar, is in the ICU and recovery might take some time given his age.
"His blood pressure was high for which we treated him and we had to put him on a ventilator because we wanted to do certain investigations. Now the ventilator was put as a safeguard so that his situation doesn't get worse. So it is not that he is critical," Dr Jalil Parkar told reporters.
"We did the investigations that were required and today we have done a small procedure on him, I will not go into the details. The procedure done is called DSA (digital subtraction angiography). The procedure has been accomplished, he is fine and stable and shifted back to ICU. By tomorrow, we hope to get him off the ventilator. All in all, he is doing quite well," he added.
Asked whether he suffered a brain haemorrhage, the doctor said, "Unko thoda haemorrhage hua tha, which we’ve tackled. No surgery is required.
As concern over Khan's health mounted, his children, including superstar Salman Khan and Arbaaz Khan, daughter Alvira, and sons-in-law Atul Agnihotri and Aayush Sharma, have been seen outside the hospital along with other well-wishers. His long-time partner Akhtar was also seen coming out of the hospital.
Khan, a household name in the 70s and 80s, turned 90 on November 24 last year. It was the day Dharmendra, the star of many of his films, including "Sholay", "Seeta aur Geeta" and "Yaadon Ki Baraat", passed away.
Hailing from an affluent family in Indore, Khan arrived in Mumbai in his 20s with dreams of stardom. He was good looking and confident he would make a mark in the industry as an actor. But that did not happen. And then, after struggling for close to a decade and getting confined to small roles in films, he changed lanes.
He worked as an assistant to Abrar Alvi and soon met Akhtar to form one of Hindi cinema's most formidable writing partnerships. They worked together on two dozen movies with most of them achieving blockbuster status.
Other than "Sholay", "Deewar" and "Don", Khan and Akhtar also penned "Trishul", "Zanjeer", "Seeta Aur Geeta", "Haathi Mere Saathi", "Yaadon Ki Baarat" and "Mr India".
