K'taka Legislative Council adopts resolution urging Centre to include 56 pc quota in 9th Schedule
Belagavi (PTI): Karnataka Legislative Council has adopted a resolution asking the central government to include the state's 56 per cent reservation decision in the ninth Schedule of the Constitution.
The resolution was adopted by the Council in the absence of the opposition members on Friday, as they had earlier staged a walkout dissatisfied with Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's reply to the debate on North Karnataka's development.
The resolution urging for the inclusion of the state's notifications and orders, increasing the reservation in employment and education for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes from 50 per cent to 56 per cent in Schedule-9 of the Constitution of India, was moved by Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H K Patil.
ALSO READ: KSRTC to run 1000 special services to clear Christmas rush
According to official sources, the demand for inclusion in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution is aimed at providing legal protection from the 50 per cent cap on reservations, imposed by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney case.
The House also adopted six resolutions urging the Centre to address long-pending issues, in the absence of opposition members.
The resolutions include: Urging the Government of India to immediately establish the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in Raichur district; to transfer at least 25 per cent of the 73 national-level institutes currently in Bengaluru to the North Karnataka region; to immediately declare the Upper Krishna Project Phase-III (UKP-III) as a national project, release central funds and demand gazette notification of the final award of the Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal-II (KWDT-II).
The resolutions demand the release of Rs 5,000 crore adjustment grant to the Kalyana Karnataka Regional Development Board from the Central Government on the Vidarbha development model; to protect farmers by fixing equal ethanol procurement quotas without discrimination, and, in accordance with the ethanol production capacity of Karnataka, based on the availability of sugarcane and other raw materials, were also passed.
A resolution was also adopted urging the Centre to expedite the necessary approvals from the Forest and Wildlife Boards for the ambitious Kalasa-Banduri Nala Diversion Project for drinking water supply, in accordance with the judgment of the Mahadayi Tribunal.
Similar resolutions were adopted in the Legislative Assembly on Thursday.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
36 ex-judges slam Opposition move to impeach Justice Swaminathan
New Delhi (PTI): Thirty-six former judges on Saturday gave a call to people, including parliamentarians, to denounce opposition leaders' move to impeach Madras High Court judge Justice G R Swaminathan, saying such an attempt, if allowed to proceed, would cut at the very roots of democracy and independence of the judiciary.
On December 1, Justice Swaminathan held that the Arulmighu Subramania Swamy Temple was duty-bound to light the lamp at the Deepathoon, in addition to the customary lighting near the Uchi Pillaiyar Mandapam.
The single-judge bench said that doing so would not encroach upon the rights of the adjacent dargah or the Muslim community.
ALSO READ: 55-bed free palliative care centre to open near Bengaluru’s Nelamangala
The order sparked a row, and on December 9, several opposition MPs, led by the DMK, submitted a notice to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to move a motion for the removal of the judge.
Taking serious exception to the move, the former judges in a joint statement said this is a "brazen attempt to browbeat judges who do not fall in line with the ideological and political expectations of a particular section of society".
"If such an attempt is permitted to proceed, it would cut at the very roots of our democracy and the independence of the judiciary," they said.
"We therefore call upon all stakeholders -- Members of Parliament across party lines, members of the Bar, civil society, and citizens at large -- to unequivocally denounce this move and ensure that it is nipped in the bud at the very inception," they added.
The statement emphasised that the judges must remain answerable to their oath and to the Constitution of India, not to "partisan political pressures or ideological intimidation".
"The message from all constitutional stakeholders must be clear and firm: in a republic governed by the rule of law, judgments are tested by appeals and legal critique, and not by threats of impeachment for political nonconformity," it said.
The statement was signed by former Supreme Court judge Krishn Murari J as well as ex-chief justices and former judges of different high courts.
The statement said the opposition party's move is not an "isolated aberration". It fits into a "clear and deeply troubling pattern" in India's recent constitutional history, where sections of the political class have sought to discredit and intimidate the higher judiciary whenever outcomes do not align with their interests, it added.
"The unprecedented bid in 2018 to initiate impeachment proceedings against then Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, the sustained campaigns of vilification directed at Chief Justices Ranjan Gogoi, S A Bobde and D Y Chandrachud while they were in office," the statement noted.
"The targeted attacks now being mounted against the incumbent CJI, Justice Surya Kant, whenever a judgment/remark displeases a political constituency, are all manifestations of the same trend," it said.
"This is not principled, reasoned criticism of judicial decisions; it is an attempt to weaponise impeachment and public calumny as instruments of pressure -- a practice that strikes at the heart of judicial independence and the basic norms of constitutional democracy," the statement added.
