Viral video shows Karnataka minister Somanna assaulting woman
Chamarajanagar(PTI): Karnataka Housing Minister V Somanna was caught up in controversy for allegedly slapping a woman in a village in Gundlupet here when she went with a plea to resolve her grievance.
The minister has not yet reacted to the incident but the woman said Somanna was only consoling her after she tried to prostrate before him with a plea to allot her a government plot.
According to the information received, Somanna, who is the district in-charge minister of Chamarajanagar, had gone to Hangla village in Gundlupet and was taking part in a property document distribution ceremony.
Property documents were given to landless people who were occupying government land for residential purposes but had not secured any ownership of it till now.
During the ceremony, the viral video purportedly showed a woman approaching the minister reportedly pleading him to allot a plot. The minister turned angry after he was shoved due to the unruly crowd and slapped the woman.
However, the minister's office shared a video in which the woman said she only pleaded a plot be granted to her as she was too poor.
"I bowed at his feet with the plea and the minister lifted me consoling me that he would help me but it was publicised that he beat me up," the woman accompanied by her children said in the video.
Congress general secretary and Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh criticised the minister for his purported conduct.
"What a difference from the way @RahulGandhi began the Karnataka leg of #BharatJodoYatra from the very same Gundlupet on 30th September! This shameless man should be sacked immediately!" Ramesh tweeted.
The Congress MP was referring to Rahul Gandhi's Bharat Jodo Yatra, which entered Karnataka from Gundlupet last month, where the incident occurred on Saturday.
K'taka BJP minister V Somanna @VSOMANNA_BJP slaps women who came to tell her grievance.
— Deepak (@Deepak_Ramaiah) October 23, 2022
Is this how @BJP4India treats women ?
Somanna must resign #ResignSomanna #SackSomanna pic.twitter.com/EVPNpzKCY2
ಸೆಪ್ಟೆಂಬರ್ 30ರಂದು ಕರ್ನಾಟಕದಲ್ಲಿ ಅದೇ ಗುಂಡ್ಲುಪೇಟೆಯಿಂದ @RahulGandhi ಅವರು #BharatJodoYatra ಅನ್ನು ಪ್ರಾರಂಭಿಸಿದ ರೀತಿಗೂ, ಈ ಕೃತ್ಯಕ್ಕೂ ಅಜಗಜಾಂತರ ವ್ಯತ್ಯಾಸ!
— Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) October 23, 2022
ಈ ನಾಚಿಕೆಯಿಲ್ಲದ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಯನ್ನ ಕೂಡಲೇ ಸಂಪುಟದಿಂದ ವಜಾಗೊಳಿಸಬೇಕು! https://t.co/dSFGhGGDMF
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Absence of teachers frustrates purpose of Right to Education Act: Allahabad HC
Prayagraj (PTI): The Allahabad High Court observed that the absence of teachers frustrates the very purpose of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and refused to interfere with the suspension of primary school teachers who were found absent from their school during an inspection.
The court also directed the state government to frame a policy ensuring the presence of teachers in schools within three months.
Justice Prakash Padia, while disposing of the writ petitions filed by Indra Devi and Leena Singh Chauhan, observed that the teachers are the "pillars of knowledge" and revered as 'Guru' in the Indian culture. The state government has an obligation to ensure the imparting of unbarred education to children.
ALSO READ:Rupee strengthens past 90/USD level in early trade
Both the government school teachers challenged the orders passed by the District Basic Education Officer suspending them, specifically on the ground that they were not found in the institution during the inspection.
The court, in an order dated December 2, while refusing to interfere in the suspension order of both teachers, observed, "It is a well-known fact that in a large number of primary institutions throughout the State of U.P., teachers are not attending the institution on time."
"It is an obligation on the state to ensure imparting unbarred education to children belonging to the primary institutions. The matters are coming every day before this Court in which allegations were made against the teachers and headmasters of the institution to the effect that they are not attending the institution within time," the court added.
