Only I can give fitting response to Cong in assembly: Yatnal on Leader of Oppostion post ambitions
Bengaluru: During a conversation with reporters, Basanagowda Patil Yatnal, a senior BJP MLA, confidently declared that he is the only individual capable of delivering a fitting response to the Congress party within the Legislative Assembly.
Yatnal expressed that he has not actively pursued the position of the leader of the opposition party, but if elected to that role, he believes he possesses the necessary capabilities to effectively counter the Congress party.
ALSO READ: Bagalkot: Medical college students in Ilkal told to compulsorily watch ‘The Kerala Story’
He further mentioned that his leadership as the opposition party's leader would add an element of excitement to the proceedings in the Vidhan Sabha.
Responding to a specific question, Yatnal emphasized that regardless of whether UT Khader or Zameer Ahmed Khan assumes the position of Speaker, they must adhere to the constitutional guidelines.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SC upholds inclusion of ‘secular, socialist’ in Preamble of Constitution
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the inclusion of the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ in the Preamble of the Constitution, confirming their retrospective application from November 26, 1949. The court ruled that the power to amend the Constitution under Article 368 extends to the Preamble, which is an integral part of the document.
A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna stated, “The power under Article 368 cannot be curtailed. It will equally apply to the Preamble.” The 42nd Constitutional Amendment, which introduced these terms in 1976 during the Emergency, was challenged on grounds of its retrospective application and the lack of states’ ratification.
The petitioners, including BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, argued that the amendment forced a particular economic theory on the nation and violated the original intent of the Constitution. Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay contended that the Preamble reflects the will of the people at the time of adoption in 1949 and is therefore unalterable.
The court dismissed these objections, affirming that both socialism and secularism are part of the Constitution's Basic Structure. The Bench clarified that socialism refers to a welfare state ensuring equality of opportunity without negating private sector participation or individualism. It emphasised that secularism is embedded in the Constitution, particularly in the principles of equality and fraternity.
Chief Justice Khanna remarked, “Secularism has always been a core feature of the Constitution.” He added that the amendment did not impose socialism as dogma but aligned with the welfare goals enshrined in various constitutional provisions.
