Parameshwara hints he too is in CM race in case of leadership change in Karnataka
Bengaluru (PTI): Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara on Sunday hinted that he too was in the race to become the Chief Minister, in case of leadership change in the state, and amid demands for a "Dalit CM".
However, trying to play down reports about confusion within the party on the issue of Chief Minister change, he pointed out that no one from the Congress high command has spoken on the matter so far, nor has it been discussed in the Congress Legislature Party.
The senior Congress leader further said that AICC President Mallikarjun Kharge will decide on leadership change, if there is a need, after discussing with top party leader Rahul Gandhi, who is currently abroad.
There have been speculations about chief minister change in the state, after the Congress government reaches the halfway mark of its five-year term in November, which is being referred to by some as the "November revolution", citing alleged "power-sharing" agreement involving CM Siddaramaiah and Deputy CM D K Shivakumar in 2023.
The government completed 2.5 years in power on November 20.
"I'm always in the race, it is not a big issue. I was the Pradesh Congress Committee President in 2013, we brought the Congress government to power (in 2013 Assembly polls). I never claimed credit for it solely. I lost in that poll. Had I won, what would have happened, I don't know," Parameshwara said in response to a question whether he was in the CM race.
Speaking to reporters here, he said, "I was in the race then, naturally, as there is a convention in the Congress party where the PCC president is often given a chance (to become CM), but it is not followed in some situations...."
Asked if he will ask the high command to consider him in case there is a leadership change, Parameshwara said, "let that situation come, such a situation has not come."
On his name doing the rounds as a probable CM candidate, amid "fight" for the top post between Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar, he termed it as media creation.
When questioned if there was a demand for a "Dalit CM" in case of a leadership change, citing repeated meetings of ministers from SC/ST community involving him, H C Mahadevappa, Satish Jarkiholi and others, Parameshwara replied, "there is demand for a Dalit to become CM for long."
"Will it happen, just because we meet," he asked. Stating that they have met several times on issues relating to the community-- like internal reservation among SCs, he said, "should we not discuss our issues. Some of us, like minded people, meet and discuss things."
Making a Dalit the CM has been a hotly debated matter within Congress, on and off for a long time now, and senior party leaders from the community like Parameshwara and Mahadevappa have spoken on the subject in the past.
To a question on confusion within the Congress party over power sharing, with CM Siddaramaiah meeting AICC President Mallikarjun Kharge on Saturday, the Minister merely said that the question should be asked to the party chief.
He also clarified that he has no plans to meet Kharge for now.
Noting that all decisions in the Congress happens involving the high command, the Home Minister asked if has anyone from the high command has said anything about leadership change and cabinet reshuffle.
He said Siddaramaiah was chosen as the Chief Minister at the Congress Legislature Party (CLP) meeting after the 2023 Assembly polls, in the presence of AICC observers, and nothing was said about a 2.5 year term for the CM then.
"Siddaramaiah was chosen as the CM then, he is there as the CM. If CM has to be changed in between, it is left to the high command. We cannot do it.....if the situation comes they will do it. It was done in the past, Veerappa Moily replaced S Bangarappa as Chief Minister," he said, adding that, however, he doesn't feel such a situation has come.
Pointing out that Congress top leader Rahul Gandhi is abroad, Kharge will discuss with him and decide, if there are such developments upon his return.
"AICC President is from Karnataka. No one probably knows the state politics better than him. He will decide, no one needs to tell him," he said.
Asked whether the Congress high command has become "incapable" in resolving the issue, Parameshwara said, there was no issue at all at the first place, and they are only the creation of media.
"Someone going to someone else's house is being made a news. People would go for some work. Recently, five of us ministers had met at Minister Satish Jarkiholi's residence for dinner. Is having dinner together also wrong. We are Ministers in the government, we would certainly discuss politics, our departments, and funds allotment. Should we not discuss anything, Why so much interest," he asked the media persons.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Opposition plans to move fresh notice seeking removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar
New Delhi (PTI): Undeterred by the rejection of their earlier notices, opposition parties are planning a fresh move to seek the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, sources said on Saturday.
According to highly placed sources, leaders from several opposition parties are in talks, and at least five senior MPs from different parties -- including the Congress, the Trinamool Congress, the Samajwadi Party and the DMK -- are working on drafting a new notice to initiate removal proceedings.
It has, however, not yet been decided which House the notice would be moved in, or whether it would be introduced in both Houses as was done last time, the source added.
Buoyed by the defeat of The Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026 in Lok Sabha on Friday, opposition leaders are aiming to secure more MPs' signatures on the notice and are looking at garnering at least 200, the source said.
"We want to make a statement. We first need to prove that the number last time was underestimated," the source added.
In its earlier notices, the opposition had accused CEC Kumar of a "failure to maintain independence and constitutional fidelity" and of acting under the "thumb of the executive".
The notices levelled sweeping charges against the CEC, alleging “proved misbehaviour” on grounds including a compromised and executive-influenced appointment, partisan functioning -- such as the alleged “graded response” doctrine targeting opposition leaders -- obstruction of electoral fraud investigations, and erosion of transparency through refusal to share data and materials.
They further accused him of enabling large-scale disenfranchisement via Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercises in Bihar and elsewhere, defying or delaying compliance with Supreme Court directions, and acting in alignment with the political executive, thereby undermining the independence of the Election Commission.
However, in almost similar responses, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and Rajya Sabha Chairman C P Radhakrishnan rejected the notices, holding that even if the allegations were assumed to be true, they did not meet the high constitutional threshold of “misbehaviour” required for removal.
They reasoned that appointment-related issues or prior government service do not constitute misconduct; differences in public statements or administrative decisions lack evidence of wilful abuse of authority; and actions like data-sharing or electoral roll revisions fall within the commission’s constitutional mandate and are subject to judicial review.
The responses also stressed that many issues cited were either speculative, politically interpretative, or sub judice, and that removal proceedings cannot be based on disagreement or perceived political consequences but require clear, specific, and provable misconduct, which, they concluded, was absent in this case.
