Kalaburagi: City police apprehended several members of a group on Wednesday as they attempted to hoist the flag representing their movement 'Kalyana Karnataka Pratyeka Rajya' at the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Circle of Kalaburagi city, on the occasion of Kannada Rajyotsava.
The members of the 'Kalyana Karnataka Pratyeka Rajya' association organized a rally from near the Court Circle to the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Circle, carrying the flag of the new state they are advocating for, with the intention to hoist it there. The police intervened, halting the rally near the United Hospital, and arrested more than 20 members of the group.
Among those arrested are the campaign committee President MS Patil and leaders Udayakumar Jewargi and Vinod Kumar Jenevari.
In anticipation of potential disturbances, the police have heightened security measures across the city.
#WATCH | Kalaburagi, Karnataka: Kalyana Karnataka Pratyeka Rajya Jagruti Samiti holds a protest demanding a separate state for the Kalyana Karnataka region on the Karnataka Rajyotsava. pic.twitter.com/jWRu9ey5Lq
— ANI (@ANI) November 1, 2023
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bengaluru, Jul 25 (PTI): The Karnataka High Court has quashed a First Information Report (FIR) filed against three Muslim men who were accused of "preaching Islam" and distributing religious pamphlets near a Hindu temple in Jamkhandi, Bagalkot district.
The complaint had alleged that the men attempted religious conversion by making promises of employment and passed derogatory remarks about Hinduism.
However, the High Court held that there was no substantial evidence of coercion, fraud, or inducement--criteria necessary for prosecution under the Karnataka Protection of Right to Freedom of Religion Act, 2022.
The court made it clear that mere expression or distribution of religious literature does not amount to an offence unless accompanied by forceful or deceitful attempts to convert.
"The essence of a free society lies in the freedom to express, discuss, and propagate beliefs," the bench observed.
It further stated that peaceful preaching, in the absence of coercion or allurement, is protected under Article 25 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to freely profess and propagate one's religion.
Additionally, the bench noted that the complainant in the case was neither the alleged victim nor a relative of one. As per Section 4 of the 2022 Act, only an aggrieved individual or their close relatives are permitted to lodge such complaints--making the FIR procedurally invalid.