PFI ban a message to 'anti-national groups': K'taka CM; Siddaramaiah seeks action against RSS
Bengaluru, Sep 28: Karnataka Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai on Wednesday welcomed the Union government's decision to ban the Popular Front of India (PFI) for its alleged terror activities, and said the move sends a message to all "anti-national groups" that they will not survive in this country.
He said all that is necessary would be done to stop PFI's activities in the state.
"For a long time, it has been a demand by the people of this country, by all political parties including the opposition CPI, CPI(M) and the Congress. PFI is the avatar (incarnation) of SIMI (banned Students' Islamic Movement of India), and KFD (Karnataka Forum for Dignity). They were involved in anti-national activities and violence," Bommai said.
Speaking to reporters here, he said they had their command outside the country and some of their important office-bearers had even gone across the border for the training.
The PFI was involved in all sorts of anti-social activities and time had come to ban this organisation, Bommai added.
"With a lot of background work, information, and cases, the Government of India under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah has taken the right decision. This is the message for all anti-national groups that they will not survive in this country. I also urge people not to associate with such organisations," he added.
To a question that PFI was strong in coastal Karnataka and the task before the state government to remove them, the Chief Minister said, "Whatever necessary, will be done."
The Union government on Wednesday banned Popular Front of India and several of its associates for five years under a stringent anti-terror law, accusing them of having "links" with global terror groups like ISIS.
Reacting to the ban, senior Congress leader Siddaramaiah sought similar action against RSS, alleging that they too were disturbing peace in the society.
However, stating that such statements reflect Congress' "relationship" with PFI, Chief Minister Bommai hit back pointing that, when Siddaramaiah was the Chief Minister, cases related with PFI were withdrawn. He said: "Do you need more evidence for it?"
"Those who function against the law, disturb peace in the society, if action is taken against them, we are not opposed to it. In the same way, RSS is also disturbing peace in the society, so action should be taken against them too," Siddaramaiah said.
Speaking to reporters here, the Leader of Opposition in the state assembly said, any organisation indulging in disturbing harmony, and spreading hatred should be banned.
To a question about BJP claiming that they have kept up their commitment of banning PFI, the former chief minister said, "Till now, why did they not ban (PFI)? It is after we put pressure, they have done it."
Terming Siddaramaiah's comments as mere political statements and meaningless, the Chief Minister said the RSS is a patriotic organisation, which is working for the weaker and downtrodden sections of the society.
"Siddaramaiah has to say such things...for every thing, he has to link it with RSS. Without taking the RSS' name, there is no Siddaramaiah's politics. Why should RSS be banned? Should they be banned for their patriotic work? Making such statements merely for the sake of politics is not right," he said.
Welcoming the Centre's decision to ban PFI, Home Minister Araga Jnanendra said it is a right move for the country's unity and integrity, and to maintain peace and order.
"Recently, the NIA and police of several states had raided several of its activists and office-bearers and had gathered evidences. Such fanatic organisations were instigating a section of youth against the country," he said.
In an eight-hour long operation on Tuesday, the Karnataka police detained over 80 people, mostly office-bearers and members of the PFI and its political offshoot Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI) from across the state, on the basis of intelligence inputs that they were trying to foment trouble in the society.
BJP national general secretary C T Ravi alleged that the PFI was nurtured by the Congress.
"In a huge step against home grown Terrorism, the Union Home Ministry has banned the Popular Front of India (PFI) and its affiliates for 5 years. Congratulations to Union Home Minister Shri @AmitShah for taking this decisive action against the #PFI that was nurtured by CONgress," he tweeted.
To a question on PFI-affiliate Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI), which has not been banned, the Chief Minister said the Centre will take a decision on it, in the days to come.
"Now, we have banned PFI, not SDPI. SDPI is a registered political party, to ban it there are separate rules and laws. When the situation comes, the Centre will decide," Bommai said.
Responding to Congress MLA Tanveer Sait calling the PFI ban a "political gimmick", Bommai said: "There was attempt to murder on Sait by PFI. He had then said PFI is a big enemy and was creating trouble and action should be taken against the organisation. Now for the sake of politics, he is speaking such things."
Welcoming the ban, state Minister for Energy, Kannada and Culture V Sunil Kumar congratulated Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah for taking the bold step.
Addressing reporters in Udupi, he said the PFI had been inciting violence in many parts of the country including Karnataka.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Sujit Nair raises concerns over speculation of DMK-AIADMK understanding to block TVK
Chennai: Journalist and political commentator Sujit Nair has expressed concern over speculation that the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam could explore a post-poll understanding to prevent Vijay-led Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam from forming the government in Tamil Nadu.
In a social media post, Sujit Nair said the election verdict in Tamil Nadu reflected a clear public demand for political change and argued that the mandate should be respected irrespective of political preferences.
Referring to reports and political discussions surrounding a possible understanding between the DMK and AIADMK, he said he hoped such developments remained only speculative conversations and did not turn into reality.
Nair stated that if such an alliance were to take shape, it would raise serious questions about ideological politics in the country. He said TVK had emerged through a democratic electoral process and that the legitimacy to govern in a parliamentary democracy comes from the people’s verdict.
According to him, attempts to prevent an electoral winner from forming the government through unexpected political arrangements may be constitutionally valid, but many people could view them as politically opportunistic.
He further said that such a move could particularly affect the political image of the DMK, which has historically projected itself around ideology, social justice and opposition politics. Nair said that in ideological terms, the DMK appeared closer to TVK than to the AIADMK, and joining hands with its long-time political rival only to remain in power could weaken its broader political narrative.
He added that the same questions would apply to the AIADMK as well, as the party had spent decades positioning itself against the DMK and such an arrangement could create discomfort among its cadre and supporters.
Drawing a comparison with Maharashtra politics in 2019, Nair said he had expressed similar views when the Shiv Sena formed an alliance with the Indian National Congress and the Nationalist Congress Party after the Assembly elections.
He said post-poll alliances between long-standing political rivals often create a public perception that ideology and electoral mandates become secondary when political power equations come into play.
Nair also said such developments increase public cynicism towards politics and reinforce the belief among voters that ideology is often sidelined after elections.
He maintained that the Tamil Nadu verdict was emphatic and said respecting both the spirit and substance of the mandate was important for the credibility of democratic politics.
