War of words erupts between Congress, BJP over Dalit identity of MLA targetted by rioters
Bengaluru: A bitter twitter war has erupted between former Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and BJP state Chief Nalin Kumar Kateel on Thursday over the Dalit identity of the Congress MLA, whose house was damaged by rioters during the recent violence here.
Projecting the incident as an attack on a Dalit MLA, several BJP leaders accusing the Congress of indulging in "appeasement politics" have questioned the grand old party's hesitation to condemn riots by "minority groups" on the residence of its own legislator.
Responding to one such purported comment by Kateel that whether Siddaramaiah and state Congress chief D K Shivakumar were pro Dalit or pro terrorists, the Leader of Opposition in a tweet said, "we are pro humans, not anti humans. We are in favour of those who light the lamp and not in favour of those who incite fire.."
"We are for builders, not destroyers. In what better way should I introduce ourselves and you?" he asked, hitting out at Kateel.
Asking Kateel whether he was pro Hindu or pro Dalit, Siddarmaiah in another tweet sought to know if he was Hindu, why isn't Akhanda Srinivasa Murthy a Hindu, but just a Dalit?
"Will you please ask your elders and clarify what is the true interpretation of Hindutva?" he chided.
Hitting back, Kattel termed Siddaramaiah's politics as 'divisive,' reminding the former CM about his AHINDA (Kannada acronym for minorities, backward classes and Dalits) movement before joining Congress and on being expelled from JD(S).
He further said, "You and your party have used Dalits for the sake of politics. Hindu dharma preaches Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam and not incite fire like you."
Siddaramaiah also in a series of tweets targetted BJP national General Secretary B L Santosh for his allegations of appeasement politics on Congress leaders, and asked when the BJP government could not give protection to a Dalit MLA's (Akhanda Srinivasa Murthy) house, how can it ensure of safety of crores of poor and Dalits.
"Don't you think it is your (government's) failure?" he asked.
Siddaramaiah also accused BJP and its leaders of shedding "crocodile tears" for Dalits.
An angry mob went on a rampage in D J Halli and adjoining areas in the capital city on Tuesday night over an inflammatory social media post allegedly put out by P Naveen, a relative of MLA Murthy.
The MLA's residence and a police station at D J Halli were torched by rioters, who also set many police and private vehicles afire, and looted the belongings of the legislator and those of his sister.
Meanwhile, rejecting state Congress chief D K Shivakumar's comments that Naveen, who posted inflammatory post was a supporter of the BJP, Deputy Chief Minister C N Ashwath Narayan said, he was a Congress worker.
"Shivakumar lacks information. It was not right on the part of a person who is a party president to speak like this... he (Naveen) has posted posts regarding (supporting) Shivakumar," he said, adding that fight between Congress and SDPI locally might have led to the incident.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Congress using hijab issue to pacify minority anger, alleges Karnataka LoP R Ashoka
Bengaluru: Leader of Opposition in the Assembly R. Ashoka has accused the Congress government of using the hijab issue to placate what he described as discontent among minority voters after the Davanagere by-election.
In a post on X on Wednesday, Ashoka alleged that the state government, instead of addressing issues such as price rise, corruption, farmers’ distress and law and order, was attempting to retain its minority vote base by reviving the hijab issue.
Referring to the 2022 dress code introduced by the BJP government, which prohibited hijab in schools and colleges, Ashoka said the Karnataka High Court had upheld the policy and emphasised the importance of discipline in educational institutions.
He questioned the Congress government’s move to revisit the issue and asked whether setting aside the court-backed policy to benefit one community could be described as secularism.
Ashoka further alleged that while the government was willing to permit hijab, it continued to prohibit saffron shawls.
He accused the government of dividing students on religious lines rather than treating schools and colleges as spaces of equality.
Drawing a comparison with Mamata Banerjee’s government in West Bengal, Ashoka claimed that excessive appeasement politics had harmed the state and warned that the Congress in Karnataka could face a similar political response.
He said voters in Karnataka would teach the Congress a lesson for what he termed “vote-bank politics” and for compromising constitutional and judicial principles.
