Will work towards bringing back BJP-JD(S) coalition govt in Karnataka: H D Kumaraswamy
Ramanagara (Karnataka) (PTI): Union Minister H D Kumaraswamy on Sunday said he will work together with the leaders and workers of the BJP and JD(S) to bring back an NDA government in the state.
There is no question of his party joining hands with the Congress once again, the JD(S) state president said.
The JD(S) had been in power twice in the state, in coalition with both national parties, despite being a junior partner -- for 20 months with BJP from February 2006 and for 14 months with the Congress after the May 2018 assembly polls. Kumaraswamy was the chief minister on both occasions.
Ahead of the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, the JD(S) joined hands with the BJP and became a part of the NDA.
"I appeal to the BJP and JD(S) workers to work together. Who should become chief minister is not important to me. With your blessings I have been the chief minister of the state twice. Welfare and development of the state and its people are important for me," Kumaraswamy said.
Addressing workers of the BJP and JD(S), ahead of the second day of a week-long protest march from Bengaluru to Mysuru against the MUDA 'scam', he said, "I will work for your sake in the days ahead with the aim of bringing back the BJP-JD(S) coalition government."
"Our fight is ultimately to bring in a pro-people government in the state, which will look after the welfare of every family. We want to bring such a government under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. For that, myself, B Y Vijayendra (BJP state president) and all leaders and workers from both parties will work together," he added.
Speaking about his experience of running the government with the Congress party in the past for 14 months, the former CM said, "There is no question of going to Congress in my life."
"It was neither there then (2018), nor now. I had not come to you (Congress) with an application to make me the chief minister. You pleaded and made me the chief minister. But I did not utilise the opportunity (as CM) to loot money, I tried to save farmers by waiving Rs 25,000 crore of farmers' loan," he said.
Recalling the support given to him by the BJP and its leader B S Yediyurappa during his first stint as chief minister in 2006, Kumaraswamy said, he did not "betray" Yediyurappa, and that certain political developments and the deeds of some people led to the situation, where transfer of power to the BJP did not happen.
"If Kumaraswamy is known to the people of the state, it is because of the blessings of the people of Ramanagara district, and the good administration we gave by forming a government with the help of Yediyurappa. I cannot forget that the workers of BJP and JD(S) have nurtured me. The coalition between BJP and JD(S) has disturbed the sleep of Congress leaders; they are worried," he added.
In 2006, Kumaraswamy had rebelled and walked out of the JD(S)-Congress coalition with 42 MLAs, reportedly against the wishes of his father former PM and JD(S) patriarch H D Deve Gowda, citing a threat to the party. He then formed the government with the BJP, becoming the chief minister during his very first term as MLA. Yediyurappa was the deputy chief minister.
Under an arrangement with the BJP for the two parties' chosen leaders to take turns as chief minister, Kumaraswamy helmed the state for 20 months.
But when the BJP's turn for chief ministership came, he reneged on the promise to transfer power and brought down the Yediyurappa government within seven days.
Kumaraswamy occupied the CM's post for the second time after the 2018 assembly polls by forging a coalition with the Congress, despite the JD(S) finishing a poor third in the polls.
But his tenure was short-lived as the wobbly coalition government that he headed collapsed after 14 months in power, because of internal differences.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
HC to decide if gram panchayat members can continue in Manipur post tenure: SC
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Thursday said the high court would decide whether the elected gram panchayat members, whose five-year tenure was over in Manipur, were entitled to continue in their posts in the event of the appointment of an administrative committee or an administrator.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh said it would like to have the benefit of the view of the high court in the matter and set a three-month time frame to adjudicate the legal question.
"The question that falls for consideration in this case is that whether the elected member of the Gram Panchayat whose five-year tenure is over was entitled to continue as members of the gram panchayat in the event of appointment of administrative committee or administrator, as contemplated under Section 22 of the Manipur Panchayati Raj Act of 1994," the bench noted.
The Manipur government’s counsel said the state could not hold panchayat elections due to the unprecedented violence.
"Since, we would like to have the advantage of the opinion of the high court, we dispose of the special leave petition without expressing any opinion on merits, with the request to the chief justice of Manipur High Court to post the main case before a division bench at the earliest. We further request the division bench, before whom the matter is listed, to provide expeditious hearing with an endeavour to resolve the controversy within three months," the bench said.
The bench noted that provision of Manipur Panchayati Raj Act was amended to substitute the word "cease" with the word "continue" with respect to the tenure of the elected members of the gram panchayat.
The petitioners have challenged a high court order and submitted that since elections in gram panchayat could not be held in Manipur for various reasons, the previously elected members of the panchayat were entitled to continue as per the amended Section 22 (3) of 1994 Act.
Section 22 deals with the power of deputy commissioner to appoint an administrative committee or an administrator for a period of six months, which will then oversee the election.
Section 22 (3) of the law says once the administrative committee or an administrator is appointed by the deputy commissioner, the elected members of earlier gram panchayat shall cease to exist.
The top court said what has been challenged before it was an interlocutory order of the high court and the main petition in which the question of law that had been raised was still pending.
The original petitioners before the high court were elected representatives at the fifth general elections for gram panchayats and the zilla parishads who sought a direction to continue in the office beyond the period of five years as stipulated by law as elections were last held in 2017.
They sought to continue as panchayat members till the time the state election commission notified the election for the sixth general elections for gram panchayats and zilla parishads.
On February 29, last year, the high court in its interim order gave liberty to Manipur government to appoint an administrative committee for each gram panchayat and zilla parishad in accordance with law and the provision of the Act.
