Hyderabad (PTI): Hyderabad-based biotechnology company BioVaram on Tuesday signed an MoU with the Telangana government to establish a CoE in Life Sciences, focusing on tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and cell and gene therapy.
The Memorandum of Understanding was signed during the ongoing Telangana Rising Global Summit, held on December 8 and 9, the company said in a statement.
Under the agreement, the state government will provide land within Bharat Future City, a proposed development on the outskirts of Hyderabad.
The government is also expected to offer funding assistance for building and operationalising the facility, the release added.
BioVaram has committed to investing Rs 250 crore to build a fully integrated innovation ecosystem dedicated to high-risk, high-impact translational research.
The proposed Centre of Excellence is expected to feature world-class infrastructure supporting AI-integrated development in key areas, including tissue engineering, advanced biomaterials, regenerative medicine, cell and gene therapy (CGT), AI-driven bioanalytics, and predictive platforms.
"India has to lead the world in innovation, and Telangana has to lead India. The BioVaram Centre for Excellence stands as a testament to what visionary collaboration between government, industry, and science can achieve," said K I Varaprasad Reddy, Founder of Shantha Biotechnics and Chairman & Mentor of BioVaram.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Bengaluru: The Karnataka government on Monday announced that a House committee will be set up to simplify the procedures for granting and renewing recognition for private aided and unaided schools. The assurance follows concerns raised in the Legislative Council over the difficulties schools face in meeting various compliance requirements like building safety and land ownership certifications.
According to a Deccan Herald report the School Education and Literacy Minister Madhu Bangarappa told the Council that the panel would be constituted during the ongoing session. He also stated that no institution would encounter any trouble until its recommendations were finalised, and that the number of criteria required for recognition had already been lowered from 62 to 48, while stating that attempts were underway to move the entire process online. He stressed the importance of student safety and stated that the government will not allow corruption among officials involved in the system.
MLCs across party lines highlighted the hardships encountered by schools in complying with the 2018 recognition rules. Congress member Puttanna said students were being forced to appear as external candidates for examinations when their schools struggled to secure timely renewal, alleging that the system had become a breeding ground for corruption. BJP member Shashil Namoshi questioned why building safety norms were being retrospectively applied to private institutions while government schools remained exempt.
Several other members, including S V Sankanur, S L Bhojegowda, Ramoji Gowda, Ramesh Babu, D T Somashekhar and Hemalatha Naik, warned that the current system had pushed many schools to the brink of closure.
Responding to a separate query on reports of government school closures under the proposed Karnataka Public Schools (KPS) model, the minister categorically denied any such plan. He told the House that no government school, including Kannada-medium institutions, would be shut “under any circumstances,” adding that facilities such as mid-day meals would continue even if only one child were enrolled.
Bangarappa said the confusion had been fuelled by misleading posts on social media and reiterated that the government was committed to strengthening public education. He noted that, contrary to rumours, some MLAs from both the ruling and opposition benches had in fact sought mergers of schools with very low enrolment. The minister said the government was ready to keep schools open, and even to start new ones, if there was demand, and questioned objections to children studying on a single campus from LKG to PUC when transportation was already being provided.
