How COVID-19 smell, taste loss differs from common cold decoded
London: Although COVID-19 patients may lose their sense of smell, they can breathe freely, do not tend to have a runny or blocked nose, and cannot detect bitter or sweet tastes, a study published on Wednesday has found.
The study is the first to compare how people with COVID-19 smell and taste disorders differ from those with other causes of upper respiratory tract infections, according to the researchers, including those from the University of East Anglia (UEA) in the UK.
The researchers hope that their work could help develop smell and taste tests for fast COVID-19 screening - in primary care and emergency departments.
The findings, published in the journal Rhinology, lend weight to the theory that COVID-19 infects the brain and central nervous system.
"The loss of smell and taste is a prominent symptom of COVID-19, however it is also a common symptom of having a bad cold, said lead researcher Carl Philpott, a professor at UEA's Norwich Medical School.
We wanted to find out exactly what differentiates COVID -19 smell loss with the kind of smell loss you might have with a cold and blocked-up nose," Philpott said.
The research team carried out smell and taste tests on 10 COVID-19 patients, 10 people with bad colds and a control group of 10 healthy people -- all matched for age and sex.
"We wanted to see if their smell and taste test scores could help discriminate between COVID-19 patients and those with a heavy cold, Philpott said.
The researchers noted that COVID-19 behaves differently to other respiratory viruses, for example by causing the body's immune system to over-react, known as a cytokine storm, and by affecting the nervous system.
They found that smell loss was much more profound in the COVID-19 patents, and they were less able to identify smells, and were not able to identify bitter or sweet tastes.
The researchers said it was this loss of true taste which seemed to be present in the COVID-19 patients compared to those with a cold.
"This is very exciting because it means that smell and taste tests could be used to discriminate between COVID-19 patients and people with a regular cold or flu, Philpott said.
"Although such tests could not replace formal diagnostic tools such as throat swabs, they could provide an alternative when conventional tests are not available or when rapid screening is needed -- particularly at the level of primary care, in emergency departments or at airports, he added.
The study also shows that there are altogether different things going on when it comes to smell and taste loss for COVID-19 patients, compared to those with a bad cold, the researchers said.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Fact Check: Viral claim on Sachar Commission proposals, Owaisi’s demand of implementation is false
Mangaluru: A viral message widely circulating on WhatsApp and other social media platforms makes several sensational and misleading claims about the Sachar Commission, a committee formed in 2005 by the UPA government to study the condition of Muslims in India.
The message begins by stating that AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi often demands the implementation of the Sachar Commission report in his public speeches. It then questions the intent behind the report and falsely claims that it suggested extreme benefits for Muslims, such as counting one Muslim vote as two, reserving 40% of legislative seats, and allocating 20% of India’s budget to Muslims.
It concludes by praising the BJP for stopping the implementation of this report and warns that had it been implemented, India would have been “turned into a Taliban-style state”.
But is there any truth in these claims? Let’s verify.
What the Viral Message Claims
The message says: Asaduddin Owaisi frequently demands the implementation of the Sachar Commission report.
The Congress-led UPA government formed the Commission in 2005 to favour Muslims and divide the country.
The Commission made 10 shocking recommendations, including:
Double voting rights for Muslims.
Inclusion of Muslims in OBC, SC, and ST quotas.
Allocation of 20% of India’s total budget for Muslims.
Free education for Muslims in IITs, IIMs, and MBBS.
Recognition of Madrasa degrees for IAS and judiciary jobs.
Reservation of 30–40% of Parliament and Assembly seats for Muslims.
50% government jobs for Muslims.
Cash benefits up to Rs 10 lakh for Muslim youth.
Reserved constituencies for Muslims in areas where they are above 25%.
Reality Check: What Was the Sachar Commission?
The Sachar Committee (formally called the Prime Minister’s High-Level Committee) was established in March 2005 under the leadership of Justice Rajinder Sachar, a former Chief Justice of Delhi High Court. It was commissioned by the Manmohan Singh-led UPA government, with support from Sonia Gandhi, to study the social, economic and educational condition of Muslims in India.
It was not a policy-making body. It only studied data and submitted a report in 2006 that highlighted the marginalisation of Muslims in various sectors.
The report included recommendations to improve inclusion, but none of the exaggerated and communal claims made in the viral message were part of the actual report.
Fact-Checking the Main Claims
Claim 1: Owaisi demands implementation of Sachar Commission
Partially True.
Asaduddin Owaisi has, on several occasions, asked the government to act on the findings of the Sachar Committee, especially regarding Muslim backwardness in education and employment. However, he has never demanded double voting rights or unconstitutional benefits. The viral message misrepresents his position by linking him to fake recommendations.
Claim 2: Muslim vote should count as two votes
False.
This is a completely fabricated claim. The Sachar Commission report makes no mention of altering the value of votes based on religion.
Claim 3: Reservation of 30–40% of seats for Muslims
False.
The report never recommended political reservations based on religion. It simply pointed out that Muslims are underrepresented in politics and governance.
Claim 4: 20% of national budget for Muslims
False.
No such recommendation exists. The Commission only advised that existing development schemes should better include all backward communities, including Muslims.
Claim 5: Free education in elite institutions
False.
The report focused on universal access to primary and secondary education. It did not propose religion-based free seats in IITs, IIMs or MBBS.
Claim 6: Madrasa degrees should be valid for IAS or judiciary
Misleading.
The Committee encouraged the modernisation of madrasas and the inclusion of modern subjects. It did not recommend that traditional religious degrees be accepted for IAS or judgeship.
Claim 7: 50% jobs for Muslims
False.
This claim is baseless. The report asked for elimination of discrimination in hiring, but did not call for job quotas based on religion.
Claim 8: Cash handouts to Muslim boys and girls
False.
There is no mention in the report of giving Rs 5–10 lakh to Muslims. It suggested schemes for educational support and skill development for poor Muslims, similar to what exists for other communities.
Claim 9: Reserved constituencies for Muslim-majority areas
False and unconstitutional.
Indian laws do not allow electoral reservation on the basis of religion. The Sachar report did not recommend this either.
What the Sachar Report Actually Found
The report offered hard data that showed:
Low literacy levels among Muslims.
Poor access to bank credit and government schemes.
Under-representation in government jobs and police.
Very poor socio-economic indicators, similar to or worse than Dalits and Adivasis.
The report did not blame any community or recommend any religion-based advantage. It simply asked the government to treat Muslim poverty and exclusion as a developmental issue, just like other backward groups.
Conclusion
The viral message makes a series of false, exaggerated, and communal claims about the Sachar Commission. It also falsely attributes these demands to Asaduddin Owaisi, when in reality, his support for the report is based on its developmental focus, not on any of the fabricated proposals listed in the message.
The Sachar Report is a data-driven document aimed at improving policy decisions. It does not promote any anti-Hindu or pro-Muslim bias, nor does it recommend the extreme measures mentioned in the viral post.
Verdict: False. The viral message grossly misrepresents the Sachar Commission's findings and intentions. It is part of an attempt to spread communal misinformation.
