New Delhi: A day after Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) announced a campaign on Twitter alleged scam by the commission in announcing the result of the UPSC exam 2019.
The users alleged that the commission had announced vacancies of 927 seats in the services but had announced results for only 829 seats without giving any information about the remaining 98 vacancies.
Through the campaign, the users alleged that the commission had scammed the 98 seats. Dalit, OBC, SC and ST rights activists soon joined the campaign and added that the commission and the Central Government were against the reservation and that the remaining 98 seats will go to the General category candidates through “backdoor”.
Noted OBC and Dalit rights activist and journalist Dilip C Mandal was also among those who participated in the campaign and sought answers from both UPSC and the Government.
Here are some of the tweets from the campaign:
NOTE: The claims made in the tweets embedded below or the ideas presented in them are those solely of the users. Vartha Bharati does not guarantee the authenticity of any of the claims or does not necessarily endorse the ideas, views posted by any of the users.
हमें मालूम है कि कम पढ़े-लिखे दोस्तों को हम #UPSC_Scam की बारीकियाँ नहीं समझा पाएंगे। लेकिन ट्विटर के दोस्त समझ जाएँगे।
— Dilip Mandal (@Profdilipmandal) August 5, 2020
इन तीन तस्वीरों को देखिए। 927 पद भरने के लिए सिर्फ 829 कैंडिडेट के रिज़ल्ट आए हैं। इसके अलावा एक गोपनीय लिस्ट बना ली गई है। यहीं पर घोटाला है। pic.twitter.com/qOsa6klWsP
After all, why only 829 people came out of 927 results, why 98 people did not get the results ??#UPSC_Scam #UPSC_Scam pic.twitter.com/3TLh9SRKur
— Bharti Tribal ? (@FOUNDERofMMES) August 5, 2020
Today, if you do not speak, the generations to come will abuse you, where were you when it was a big scam???#UPSC_Scam
— Bharti Tribal ? (@FOUNDERofMMES) August 5, 2020
Telling govt notification is 927 vacancy in civil service. The result came of 829 candidates. Why are the remaining 98 seats being filled in a secret way?@HansrajMeena#UPSC_Scam
— Dilraj Meena (आज़ाद परिंदा) ? (@Meena_ji1234) August 5, 2020
central government has released advertisements for 927 civil service officers. But the result came from 829 candidates. A confidential reserve list of 182 candidates was created which is outside the purview of the RTI.82 posts of OBC, SC,ST to be transferred to General#UPSC_Scam pic.twitter.com/TOgMwaBp7Q
— अभिषेक बगानिया अम्बेडकर (रावण) (@ABHISHEKBAGANI2) August 5, 2020
927-829=98 Result has not declared yesterday,
— Deependra Gautam(अंबेडकरवादी) (@Deependr_Gautam) August 5, 2020
Is this conspiracy with OBC,ST,ST reservation,
Yes it is,
We must demand that we Bahujan will not tolerate with weakening of original concept of Reservation #UPSC_Scam#UPSC_Scam @FOUNDERofMMES @HansrajMeena @Vandnameena_
We want all the results #UPSC_Scam
— Prince Kumar (@PrinceK45680439) August 5, 2020
#UPSC_Scam
— Lokendra Gurjar (@WithLokendra) August 5, 2020
U can't understand the conspiracy going inside UPSC list of successful candidate of 2019,
Toatal seat 927 as per UPSC notification 2018 for IAS,IPS,IFS
Now final result has come of only 829
What abt rest over 98 seats
We demand release all 929 results#UPSC_Scam
#UPSC_Scam
— RAJESH KUMAR MEENA (@RajeshK_Bharja) August 5, 2020
This is totally scam of 98 seats,
From back door all 98 seats will be fill up by General candidates,
U will never know what happened with 71 OBC,8 SC,3 ST candidates who is right now in waiting list
My que is why not all 929 result of UPSC declared in one go,why???
This is massive. Urgent investigation warranted
— Dalit Unity (@DalitUnity) August 5, 2020
What @PMOIndia is doing to the nation ????#UPSC_Scam https://t.co/Xfh4U2OrXD
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Panaji (PTI): The Bombay High Court on Monday converted a civil suit against Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub into a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) saying "someone has to be held accountable" for the tragedy in which 25 people were killed.In a stern observation, Goa bench of the High Court of Justices Sarang Kotwal and Ashish Chavan said the local panchayat had "failed to take suo motu cognisance" of the club and had taken "no action despite complaints."
The division bench directed the Goa government to file a detailed reply on the permissions granted to the nightclub.
The High Court, while fixing January 8 as the next date of hearing, pointed out that commercial operations were continuing in the structure despite it having been served a demolition order.
The original petition was filed after the December 6 tragedy by Pradeep Ghadi Amonkar and Sunil Divkar, the owners of the land on which the nightclub was operating.
ALSO READ: Veteran Congress leader Shamanuru Shivashankarappa laid to rest with full state honours
Advocate Rohit Bras de Sa, the lawyer representing the petitioner, was made amicus curiae in the matter and has been asked to file a detailed affidavit in the matter.
In their petition, Amonkar and Divkar highlighted "the alarming pattern of statutory violations that have remained inadequately addressed despite multiple complaints, inspections, show-cause notices, and even a demolition order".
They contended that these violations posed "immediate threats to public safety, ecological integrity, and the rule of law in the state of Goa."
Investigations by multiple agencies into the nightclub fire have revealed various irregularities, including lack of permissions to operate the nightclub.
The Goa police arrested five managers and staff members of the club, while co-owners Gaurav Luthra and Saurabh Luthra have been detained in Thailand after they fled the country.
