New Delhi: Amidst increasing reports of differences between PM Modi and UP CM Yogi Adityanath micro-blogging site Twitter was on Wednesday flooded with tweets and hashtag #ModiVsYogi.
Twitter users took to their handles and expressed their views regarding the reports of a possible rift between two of the greatest stalwarts of the party currently.
While some mocked Modi saying Karma was repeating to him what he did to LK Advani, others sided with the PM in the battle and ruled out the possibility of Yogi taking over Modi.
The reports regarding the feud between the duo have now been doing round for a while now and it was further fuelled by Modi and his confidante Amit Shah skipping to wish Yogi Adityanath on his birthday.
The official page of BJP Uttar Pradesh also hinted towards the rift between the State Unit and party’s high command after it took down the cover picture on its social media handles that featured Narendra Modi and replaced it with pictures of Yogi Adityanath along with other leaders from the state.
Here are some of the tweets from the campaign.
NOTE: The claims made in the tweets embedded below or the ideas presented in them are those solely of the users. Vartha Bharati does not guarantee the authenticity of any of the claims or does not necessarily endorse, support the ideas, views posted by any of the users.
Yogi’s Masterstroke ??
— Razi Ahmed khan (@RaziAhmed_Khan) June 8, 2021
UP BJP removes Modi from its FB & Twitter cover.. You both fight each other. India doesn't deserve either of you.#ModiVsYogi pic.twitter.com/EFGNy6oPBb
So now there is Two options for PM candidate in 2024 election.
— Partha Sarathi Seth (@Seth_SPartha) June 9, 2021
#ModiVsYogi pic.twitter.com/001kXUJJdb
#ModiVsYogi
— Dr Hirdesh Chaudhary (@DrHChaudhary) June 9, 2021
फर्क साफ है... pic.twitter.com/5WHrBJulgG
#ModiVsYogi
— socialist vivek Yadav (@VivekYa77878784) June 9, 2021
After seeing this trend
Happiest person right now
? pic.twitter.com/iuRK4ZeBkS
We want both to be out#ModiVsYogi pic.twitter.com/paZnt2I7QT
— Veera Reddy (@tvrTDP) June 9, 2021
These days if any of my bhakt relatives from UP send any BJP praising post in the group, I just ask one question and they get vanished, "achha fir kiski side ho modi ya yogi?".?#ModiVsYogi
— Greeshma Shukla?? (@GreeshmaShukla) June 9, 2021
When u thought Advani is bad, they brought Modi to make Advani look good .
— S Shreya (@s_shreyatweets) June 9, 2021
When u thought Modi is bad, they brought Yogi to make Modi look good
When u thought Yogi is bad, they brought Kapil & Pragya to Make Yogi look good
BJP is wholesale dealer in Poison. ??#ModiVsYogi
Bhakts has confused now whom do support in battle of #ModiVsYogi pic.twitter.com/bJ8Abb4X7l
— Himanshu chauhan (@Himanshu_Aap_) June 9, 2021
The problem with Modi is that he knows that Yogi cant win UP in 2022. If BJP looses UP in 2022, 2024 for Modi will not be easy. The whole western UP have gone out of hands of Yogi
— Mukesh Mittal (@hallagullaboy) June 9, 2021
So to save Modi, Yogi have to go from the seat#ModiVsYogi
The only man who knows what's happening between #ModiVsYogi.#ChellamSir pic.twitter.com/j3UzDJFMMo
— Ravi shakya (@rkraajshakya) June 9, 2021
#ModiVsYogi trending now morning
— Ajay Uikey ?? (@aj1993uk) June 9, 2021
Le amit shah~ pic.twitter.com/8fW0T5ZzBB
Meanwhile Public Reaction To#ModiVsYogi ? pic.twitter.com/D17ejtdqTX
— Dip pandya | #AAPGUJARAT ?? ? (@dippandya25) June 9, 2021
#ModiVsYogi
— CONGRESS FOREVER (@MyLeaderRahul) June 9, 2021
In the fight between Modi and Yogi, either one will be defeated.
But India wants both be defeated... pic.twitter.com/rT8yz9HKQ1
#ModiVsYogi #yogivsmodi
— AKSHAY KUMAR (@GautamBrand00) June 9, 2021
Meanwhile Advani ji pic.twitter.com/vNGh6KkQSZ
Advani spectating #ModiVsYogi pic.twitter.com/6JSshGCfAn
— Azy (@AzyConTrolI) June 8, 2021
People are trending #ModiVsYogi
— Mr.Fixit (@yippeekiyay_dk) June 8, 2021
Meanwhile RW trolls in space pic.twitter.com/7RDyMTEckM
After seeing #ModiVsYogi trend.
— Swati Dixit ? ? ?( JCB Waali ) (@SwatiIKR) June 8, 2021
One Bhakt to another : ?? pic.twitter.com/13OLDFyYbW
Wow the ? is on.. interestingly CM Yogi is never staying too far behind to fill the gaping holes in his personality that may make him seem lesser than PM Modi.#ModiVsYogi pic.twitter.com/HN1FUQO2uu
— sunitajadhav (@sunmor2901) June 9, 2021
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Wednesday flagged concern over state governments not complying with its directions to enhance their stray dog sterilisation capacity, saying, "They are all building castles in the air."
A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and N V Anjaria, which commenced hearing states' submissions on compliance of its earlier directions, expressed its unhappiness over the progress and said they were engaged in "storytelling".
Senior advocate Gaurav Agarwal, who has been appointed amicus curiae in the matter, summarised the initiatives taken by different states, while flagging the deficiencies.
He pointed out that some states have taken steps in consonance with the top court's direction, but there was still a long way to go for total compliance.
The governments will have to step up animal birth control (ABC) facilities, ramp up sterilisation of stray dogs, set up dog pounds (animal shelters), fence up institutional areas and remove stray animals from roads and highways, the advocate said.
Pointing to the initiatives taken by the Bihar government, Agrawal said there are 34 ABC Centres where, they say, 20,648 dogs have been sterilised. But they have not specified the daily capacity of sterilisation, and for what period the figure specifies, he said.
"The state should have done a complete audit of ABC centres. If there are more than six lakh dogs in the state, sterilisation of 20,648 dogs is totally insufficient. Ninety-one dogs are presently lodged in the pounds.
"The affidavit does not indicate in how many institutional areas the survey has been done to see if there are fences, boundary walls, etc.," Agarwal submitted.
The bench said, "They are all building castles in the air. None of the states have given data on how many stray dog bites happened, except for Assam."
Advocate Manish Kumar, appearing for the Bihar government, however, said the state was putting things in place, and substantial progress will be made within three months.
The top court also expressed surprise over the data on dog bites in Assam. "Look at the statistics of bites. It is astonishing. In 2024, there were 1.66 lakh bites. And in 2025, only in January, there were 20,900. This is shocking," it observed.
The bench said that states cannot make vague statements, and all vague averments are made on affidavits. "We are going to pass strong strictures against states that make vague averments," Justice Nath said.
The apex court, which also heard the submissions of Goa, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand and Gujarat, observed non-compliance of directions for fencing of institutional areas to prevent ingress of stray animals into schools and hospitals.
"Every public building should be fenced, not only because of stray dogs or other animals but also to protect the property from theft," the bench observed. It said that states have engaged in "storytelling and nothing concrete appears to have been done on the ground".
Agrawal said he will summarise the steps taken by Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh and Telangana on Thursday.
The top court posted the matters for hearing on Thursday.
On January 20, the top court came down heavily on former Union minister Maneka Gandhi for her remarks criticising apex court orders in the stray dog issue, saying she has committed contempt of court.
The top court was hearing several petitions seeking modification of its November 7, 2025, order directing authorities to remove stray animals from the institutional areas and roads. On January 13, the top court said it would ask states to pay a "heavy compensation" for dog bite incidents and hold dog feeders accountable for such cases.
The court also flagged concerns over the non-implementation of norms on stray animals for the last five years.
Earlier, the apex court said it would not go into the allegations of harassment of women dog feeders and caregivers by purported anti-feeder vigilantes since it was a law and order issue, and the aggrieved persons could lodge FIRs about it. It also refused to go into the claims about certain derogatory remarks being made about women on the issue.
Taking note of the "alarming rise" in dog-bite incidents within institutional areas such as educational institutions, hospitals and railway stations, the apex court on November 7 directed relocation of stray canines forthwith to designated shelters after due sterilisation and vaccination.
It had also said stray dogs picked up shall not be released back to their original place. The court had directed authorities to ensure the removal of all cattle and other stray animals from the state highways, national highways and expressways.
The top court is hearing a suo motu case, initiated on July 28 last year, over a media report on stray dog bites leading to rabies, particularly among children, in the national capital.
