New Delhi: Right-wing Twitter users on Wednesday evening started a campaign on the micro-blogging site, calling for a boycott of TIME magazine after it listed Shaheen Bagh ‘Dadi’ Bilkis among the 100 Most Influential People of the World in 2020.
The list also includes PM Narendra Modi, actor Ayushmann Khurrana, Google CEO Sundar Pichai are among others.
While PM Modi was listed in the "Leaders" category, Bilkis, a.k.a "Dadi of Shaheen Bagh", was featured under "Icons".
Bilkis is among those better known as the 'Dadis (Grandmothers) of Shaheen Bagh' and had led the protests from the front, shedding the comfort of their homes.
The profile of Bilkis in the TIME magazine list, written by journalist and writer Rana Ayyub, says she "became the voice of the marginalized in India".
Twitter users called for boycotting the magazine alleging that it was listing someone “Who prompted riots” in the list of “World’s Most Influential People in 2020”.
NOTE: The claims made in the tweets embedded below or the ideas presented in them are those solely of the users. Vartha Bharati does not guarantee the authenticity of any of the claims or does not necessarily endorse, support the ideas, views posted by any of the users.
One more proof of how western agencies and certain anarchist organizations are Propaganding a false narrative of India's political situations.
— Vinay Tendulkar (@TendulkarBJP) September 23, 2020
All they want is to defame the culture and values of Indic civilization so that they can pull us down to their level.
#BoycottTIME
It's really hard to understand why #Bilkis was considered in most influential persons.
— Monty Rana (@montyyrana) September 23, 2020
Did she influence a significant amount of mass towards something productive?
Saperatism is quite easy to propagate as it's destructive in nature. It looks more like biased media. #BoycottTIME pic.twitter.com/XbEjuLyRWF
#TIMEMagazine have placed Bilkis bano among "100 most influential people" in the world.
— प्रवीण चौहान ? 40k (@ChauhanSaabPC) September 23, 2020
How can they praise a woman who Face of Riots in New Delhi?
Time to #BoycottTIME pic.twitter.com/PzWLs7JXYQ
We don't need any certificate from these West ppl for our PM.. Ye hamesha se aise hi divide n rule game play karte h #BoycottTIME pic.twitter.com/9iHknJw5OQ
— Amit Sharma (@AmitsharmaGRENO) September 23, 2020
People who don’t know what they stand for are termed heroes. That is the vile power of left media. #boycottTime https://t.co/G0NO0rKTGM
— Ravi Gupta®️ (@RaviGuptaINDIAN) September 23, 2020
#BoycottTIME jai hind
— Kusum Tomar (@KusumTomar19) September 23, 2020
#BoycottTIME
— Sakshi Gupta (@sakshigupta76) September 23, 2020
That failed Shaheen bagh protester Bilkis featured on Time magazine..
Meanwhile Rahul Gandhi who is not featured...?? pic.twitter.com/kkHZKoyFeI
These rioters were there for Wages , Biryani and time rewarded them for being traitors.#BoycottTime#BoycottTIME pic.twitter.com/0p3SM0nDtW
— अहं भारतीयः (@Skylark_Indian) September 23, 2020
Suffering from Shortage of Toilet Paper ?
— Roshan singh (@Roshans82660478) September 23, 2020
No worries, we have a lot of it. ??#StandWithGilgitBaltistan#IndiaTrustModi #BoycottTIME pic.twitter.com/AfblBHsBd5#BoycottTIME pic.twitter.com/ZTt126t8KN
#BoycottTime
— Meet Patel (@MeetPat92472800) September 23, 2020
This magazine is utterly ridiculous because whichever It is praisefully prescribed, has to be whether an Anti-national or a communist. Boycott this basket case. ??????? pic.twitter.com/8Fb4yzczof
#BoycottTIME Actually Times Magazine does need to add our PM We all know him and how powerful is he? They are free to show their cheap mind set in their double standard Magazine.
— Akanksha Singh (@Akanksha101294) September 23, 2020
#BoycottTime Must Must Must
— AJIT SINGH (@ajits1072) September 23, 2020
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Batumi (Georgia), Jul 26 (PTI): Young Indian International Master Divya Deshmukh held her nerves to hold stalwart Koneru Humpy to a draw in game 1 of the FIDE Women's World Cup final, with both players having their share of opportunities to take the lead here on Saturday.
The draw with black means Humpy, the two-time World Rapid champion, holds a slight edge going in the second and final game under the classical chess rules in the two-game mini-match, and should the deadlock continue, games of shorter duration will be played to determine the winner.
Humpy employed the Queen's gambit accepted as black and it turned out to be a pretty fascinating game right out of the opening as Divya, 19, came up with a piece sacrifice early to deny the black king the right to castle.
Humpy was the first to err and, according to computers, Divya had things under control on the 14th move. However in her bid to recover the extra material, the Nagpur girl, who has secured a place in the Candidates tournament with her sterling performance here, missed a promising continuation.
What followed the exchange of all minor pieces and the ensuing queen and rook endgame gave enough counter play to both players. The game was eventually drawn after Humpy sacrificed her rook to force perpetual checks.
"The game saw an extremely sharp battle with the game ending in a draw in 41 moves. On move 7, Divya made her aggressive intentions clear by offering another pawn,
which looked like home preparation. Humpy made a practical decision of refraining from taking the pawn and a balanced position was reached by move 10 by white," said Grandmaster Pravin Thipsay, an Arjuna awardee and the first Indian to get a chess Grandmaster norm.
"However, instead of developing the undeveloped Knight, Humpy retreated the centralised Knight on move 10, giving huge positional advantage to Divya. Divya could have gained huge positional advantage on the 12th move by moving a rook. However, she chose to play for King side attack by sacrificing a piece instead.
"Humpy, too, erred at this stage and instead of moving the King to Queen side, moved it to the King side. Divya, on move 14, could have obtained a crushing attack by threatening a mate by developing her Queen. Instead she chose to exchange a pair of Bishops first, which enabled Humpy to defend her King by returning the piece," said Thipsay.
"Players thus reached a balanced Queen and two Rooks ending. Divya continued to play ambitiously and tried to attack Humpy’s King but the latter defended accurately and the game was drawn in 41 moves by perpetual check," he added.
In the play-off for the third place, Chinese players Zhongyi Tan, the former women's world champion and top seed Lei Tingjie also decided to split points out of a Queen’s gambit declined game.
The opening raised visions of a close contest between the two but having been knocked out of title race in the previous round, none of them wanted to take any huge risk. It was still a middle game when the players shook hands.
With the top two positions sealed for the Indians, the berth to the next Candidates is also assigned, while the player finishing third will also get an entry to the premier event scheduled for 2026.
Results: Divya Deshmukh (Ind) drew with Koneru Humpy (Ind); Zhongyi Tan (Chn) drew with Tingjie Lei (Chn).