Hate Speech on X increased by 50% after Elon Musk takeover, study finds
New Delhi: A new study published in PLOS ONE has found that hate speech on X (formerly Twitter) surged by 50% for at least eight months following Elon Musk’s acquisition of the platform in October 2022. The research, led by Daniel Hickney from the University of California, Berkeley, highlights a significant rise in racist, homophobic, and transphobic slurs during this period.
The study analyzed 4.7 million English-language posts from early 2022 to June 9, 2023, covering both the ten months before and eight months after Musk’s takeover. The findings revealed that the average number of hate speech posts increased from 2,179 per week to 3,246. Transphobic slurs showed the highest growth, with weekly occurrences rising from 115 to 418 posts.
Engagement with such posts also grew, with the rate of user likes on hate speech content increasing by 70%. Researchers suggest this rise could be due to reduced content moderation, increased activity by hateful users, or changes in the platform’s algorithm that inadvertently promoted such content.
Musk’s policy changes following his $44 billion acquisition, including firing much of X’s content moderation team and disbanding the platform’s Trust and Safety Council, are believed to have contributed to the surge. The study also noted a potential increase in bot activity, particularly through a rise in cryptocurrency-related posts.
While the research focused only on English-language posts, representing just 31% of X’s total content, it presents a concerning picture of the platform’s handling of hate speech. Despite Musk’s earlier promises to tackle such issues, the study suggests that these problems have only intensified under his leadership.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Mysuru royal family member asks villagers not to panic after her claim over 4,500 acres of land
Bengaluru (PTI): Pramoda Devi Wadiyar of the erstwhile Mysuru royal family on Monday said the residents of Siddayyanapura in Chamarajanagar district need not worry as she would not take any steps even if the land she has staked claim is found in the name of the royal family.
The assurance came after Wadiyar said over 4,500 acres of land in Siddayyanapura belonged to the royal family as per the agreement between the Maharaja of erstwhile Mysore and the Government of India in February 1951.
Recently when the state government moved ahead to declare Siddayyanapura as a revenue village, Wadiyar shot a letter to the Deputy Commissioner and Tehsildar of Chamarajanagar and other senior officials in the Government of Karnataka in this regard stating that the Mysuru royal family owns a parcel of land in the village, which they want to declare as a revenue village.
As the panicked villagers made a beeline before the Deputy Commissioner to resolve the issue and even claimed that the Mysuru Maharaja had gifted them land.
In order to clear confusion among people of Siddayyanapura, Wadiyar told reporters here, “We don’t know why the villagers are in fear. I am saying this now that they need not get scared now or even in future. I am giving them assurance that even if the Khatha comes in our name, they need not be afraid.”
She, however, complained that the Deputy Commissioner did not provide any document regarding the status of the property. Wadiyar wondered why people were in fear.
“I was away from the town and I was not aware of this issue at all. I learnt about this only when I read about it. I don’t know who created fear among them and I am not aware of what happened on the ground,” the successor of Mysuru royal family said.
Regarding the claim that the Mysuru Maharaja had given them land as gift, Wadiyar said, “If the Mysuru Maharaja had given them gift then do we need to snatch it back from them?”
She also said that the district authorities could have told her about the status of the land when they decided to make it a revenue village.
“Even if the land is transferred in our name, I will not create a situation that would scare them. I cannot give more assurance than this. We will do our best without the intervention of the State government, and there is no need for the government to intervene.
