New Delhi: Condemning the witch-hunt of Journalists, Twitter users on Monday started a campaign on the micro-blogging site demanding the release of Journalist Prashant Kanojia.
The campaign that started at 4 pm on Monday, soon caught the pace and #ReleasePrashantKanojia was one of the top three trending topics on Twitter India at the time of posting this report, with over 20,000 tweets in less than two hours.
Journalist Prashant Kanojia was arrested by the Uttar Pradesh Police on August 18 from his residence in Delhi in connection with a tweet that he posted from his Twitter account.
“There were five-six people. Only one of them was in uniform. The rest were in civil clothes. At first, they gave us no reason as to why he was being arrested, except to say that orders had come from above.” Prashant’s wife Jagisha Arora had said after his arrest.
The FIR alleges that Kanojia had tweeted a morphed Facebook post by Sushil Tiwari of the Hindu Army, with the intent of defaming the latter.
The FIR notes that Kanojia’s tweet was objectionable and could have resulted in disturbing communal harmony, create tension between different communities, and hurt religious feelings, which can threaten law and order.
His wife Arora, however, had said, “He had not tweeted this at all. Someone edited that image to make it look so. I am 100 percent sure that he has not tweeted anything of the sort.”
This isn’t the first time Kanojia has had run-ins with the law. Earlier this year, an FIR was filed against him for making “objectionable remarks about Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on social media.
Several top political leaders and activists including Jignesh Mevani, Swara Bhasker and others tweeted in support of the campaign and demanded his release.
Here are some of the tweets from Monday’s campaign that demanded Kanojia’s release.
NOTE: The claims made in the tweets embedded below or the ideas presented in them are those solely of the users. Vartha Bharati does not guarantee the authenticity of any of the claims or does not necessarily endorse, support the ideas, views posted by any of the users.
Prashant Kanojia has been arrested twice in two years by the same UP Police. It simply indicates that the brahmanical nexus of state- police is hellbent to take 'revenge' from bahujans who question them.#ReleasePrashantKanojia
— Jignesh Mevani (@jigneshmevani80) September 28, 2020
#PrashantKanojia is in jail for a tweet.. that did no harm.. meanwhile @KapilMishra_IND ............ ??♀️??♀️??♀️??♀️ #NewIndia #ReleasePrashantKanojia https://t.co/6OGloLWmbb
— Swara Bhasker (@ReallySwara) September 28, 2020
UP is the worst state in India where journalists are arrested for dissent. I stand with Prashant Kanojia and demand #ReleasePrashantKanojia
— پربھا (@deepsealioness) September 28, 2020
Rise in rage against the attack on dissent. The Modi- Yogi duo wants to establish an authoritarian rule. But we shall stand fiercely upholding our Constitution!
— AISA Delhi (@aisa_delhi) September 28, 2020
Shame on UP police!!#ReleasePrashantKanojia
Prashant Kanojia's Partner Appeals For Twitter Trend To Demand Journalist's Release
— Indias Muslims (@IndiasMuslims) September 28, 2020
Jagisha Arora said in a video that @PJkanojia was arrested for standing up to the government and speaking up for women, Dalits and Muslims#ReleasePrashantKanojia https://t.co/pRNbtDn56j
We stand in solidarity with Prashant Kanojia. He has been targeted for speaking out against this system, for speaking against the power.
— Power of Socialism (@PoS__community) September 28, 2020
Targeting of dissenting voices has been the method of this authoritarian government.#ReleasePrashantKanojia ✋✋@PoS__community ? pic.twitter.com/AHEMQuJDo1
Constitution gave us the space to exercise freedom of speech. Then why has it become a crime under Modi-Yogi regime? Free Prashant Kanojia! Free all political prisoners!#ReleasePrashantKanojia
— Damni Kain (@DamniKain) September 28, 2020
Prashant Kanojia has been arrested twice in two years by the same UP Police. It simply indicates that the brahmanical nexus of state- police is hellbent to take 'revenge' from bahujans who question them.#ReleasePrashantKanojia
— Jagisha Arora (@jagishaarora) September 28, 2020
Stop attacking Dalit Intellectuals, Activists, Journalists and Lawyers. #ReleasePrashantKanojia
— Hritik #DalitLivesMatter (@Rittikated) September 28, 2020
Journalist @PJkanojia is the voice of Bahujans. His arrest is a targetted attack on Bahujan activism. Anti-caste activists are hated by Left, Right & Centre, hence there's hardly any voice in support of him.
— Deepika Singh (@Deepika_Theias) September 28, 2020
Stop harrassing anti-caste activists and #ReleasePrashantKanojia.
Babasaheb is behind us and we will surely win. Jai bhim.#ReleasePrashantKanojia pic.twitter.com/y4vwrqkgUb
— dimple yadav (@dimpleydv_) September 28, 2020
We need to speak today for a great
— Saira Ambedkar (घर में रहें-सुरक्षित रहें) (@SairaAmbedkar) September 28, 2020
voice that always raised against wrong.#ReleasePrashantKanojia pic.twitter.com/uOO4Gkss1J
Prashant bhai always spoke for us.
— Buffalo Intellectual ? (@BuffaloSpeaks) September 28, 2020
He spoke against caste atrocities,
for Muslims, for women & against Fascists.
Now its time for us to speak for him!! Stand with him!
Twitter storm- #ReleasePrashantKanojia
Journalist @PJkanojia is languishing in jail because
— Shahid (@Shahid_Naim007) September 28, 2020
1. He Fights for Truth
2. He stands against atrocities
3. He speaks up for weak
4. He is fearless
5. He asks tough questions to goverment
Yes we all say aloud #ReleasePrashantKanojia pic.twitter.com/9steLKeV59
Over 300 #Journalists, writers & activists have signed a public statement condemning journalist @PJkanojia arrest by the UP police
— Tanya Yadav (@TanyaYadav128) September 28, 2020
~ via @roshan_b
#ReleasePrashantKanojia
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Kochi (PTI): The prosecution had "miserably" failed to prove the conspiracy charge against Dileep in the sensational 2017 actress sexual assault case, a local court has observed while citing inconsistencies and lack of sufficient evidence against the Malayalam star.
The full judgement of Ernakulam District and Principal Sessions Court Judge Honey M Varghese was released late on Friday, and has revealed the judge also pointing out at unsustainable arguments put forth by the prosecution.
"The prosecution miserably failed to prove the conspiracy between accused No.1 (Pulsar Suni) and accused No.8 (Dileep) in executing the offence against the victim," the court held.
It examined in detail, the prosecution's allegation that Dileep had hired the prime accused to sexually assault the survivor and record visuals, including close-up footage of a gold ring she was wearing, to establish her identity.
On page 1130 of the judgment, under paragraph 703, the court framed the issue as whether the prosecution's contention that NS Sunil (Pulsar Suni) recorded visuals of the gold ring worn by the victim at the time of the occurrence, so as to clearly disclose her identity, was sustainable.
The prosecution contended Dileep and Suni had planned the recording so that the actress' identity would be unmistakable, with the video of the gold ring intended to convince Dileep that the visuals were genuine.
However, the court noted that this contention was not stated in the first charge sheet and was introduced only in the second one.
As part of this claim, a gold ring was seized after the victim produced it before the police.
The court observed that multiple statements of the victim were recorded from February 18, 2017, following the incident, and that she first raised allegations against Dileep only on June 3, 2017.
Even on that day, nothing was mentioned about filming of the ring as claimed by the prosecution, the court said.
The prosecution failed to explain why the victim did not disclose this fact at the earliest available opportunities.
It further noted that although the victim had viewed the sexual assault visuals twice, she did not mention any specific recording of the gold ring on those occasions, which remained unexplained.
The court also examined the approvers' statements.
One approver told the magistrate that Dileep had instructed Pulsar Suni to record the victim's wedding ring.
The court observed that no such wedding ring was available with her at that time.
During the trial, the approver changed his version, the court said.
The Special Public Prosecutor put a leading question to the approver on whether Dileep had instructed the recording of the ring, after which he deposed that the instruction was to record it to prove the victim's identity.
The court observed that the approver changed his account to corroborate the victim's evidence.
When the same question was put to another approver, he repeated the claim during the trial but admitted he had never stated this fact before the investigating officer.
The court noted that the second approver even went to the extent of claiming Dileep had instructed the execution of the crime as the victim's engagement was over.
This showed that the evidence of the second approver regarding the shooting of the ring was untrue, as her engagement had taken place after the crime.
The court further observed that the visuals themselves clearly revealed the victim's identity and that there was no need to capture images of the ring to establish identity.
In paragraph 887, the court examined the alleged motive behind the crime and noted that in the first charge sheet, the prosecution had claimed that accused persons 1 to 6 had kidnapped the victim with the common intention of capturing nude visuals to extort money by threatening to circulate them and there was no mention about Dileep's role in it.
The court also rejected the prosecution's claim that the accused had been planning the assault on Dileep's instructions since 2013, noting that the allegation was not supported by reliable evidence.
It similarly ruled out the claim that Suni attempted to sexually assault the victim in Goa in January 2017, stating that witness statements showed no such misconduct when he served as the driver of the vehicle used by the actress there.
The court also discussed various controversies that followed Dileep's arrest and the evidence relied upon by the prosecution, ultimately finding that the case had not been proved.
Pronouning its verdict on the sensational case on December 8, the court acquitted Dileep and three others.
Later, the court sentenced six accused, including the prime accused Suni, to 20 years' rigorous imprisonment.
The assault on the multilingual actress, after the accused allegedly forced their way into her car and held it under their control for two hours on February 17, 2017, had shocked Kerala.
Pulsar Suni sexually assaulted the actress and video recorded the act with the help of the other convicted persons in the moving car.
