US academic conference on ‘Dismantling Global Hindutva’ targeted by Hindu groups days before event
Indian speakers at conference receive threat emails, gets trolled on Twitter
Hindu Janajagruti Samiti, writes to Home Minister Shah demanding action against Indian participants
Boston, US: The first American academic conference on ‘Dismantling Global Hindutva’ is being widely targeted by right-wing activists in India and elsewhere. The three-day conference is scheduled to take place from September 10-12.
Cosponsored by departments and centers of more than 53 universities, most of them from the US, including Harvard, Stanford, and Princeton, the “Dismantling Global Hindutva” conference will discuss various issues relating to the Hindu supremacist ideology in India and elsewhere, an Al-Jazeera report stated.
Various panels on global Hindutva, caste oppression, Islamophobia, and the persecution of minorities in India, will be held during the conference and will feature more than 25 academicians, activists, and journalists as speakers.
Over the past three weeks, the organizers and speakers of the conference have been on a receiving end of harassment and intimidation by various Hindu right-wing groups and individuals staunchly opposing the conference, calling it a “Hinduphobic gathering”.
The organizers insist the conference only aims to discuss the global implications of Hindutva and develop resources for an anti-Hindutva pedagogy in the academy, the Al-Jazeera report further stated.
Hindu Janajagruti Samiti, a far-right group whose members are accused of assassinating journalist-activist Gauri Lankesh in 2017, also wrote to India’s Union Home Minister Amit Shah, calling on him to take action against India-based speakers and participants of the conference.
Nandani Sundar, who is set to take part in the conference as a speaker said she has been receiving hateful emails and was trolled on Twitter.
“This is what Hindutva groups have been doing in India – shutting down seminars by threatening the organizers, physical disruption, etc. Now they are doing the same thing globally,” Sundar was quoted as saying by Al-Jazeera.
Over the past three weeks, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America (VHPA), the Coalition of Hindus in North America (CoHNA), and the Hindu American Foundation (HAF) claim to have collectively sent more than 1.3 million emails to dozens of universities to withdraw their support for the conference.
David Ludden, professor of history at New York University, one of the co-sponsoring schools, acknowledged receiving thousands of emails but says his department will not back out.
“Administrators did receive emails claiming that the conference represents an anti-Hindu ideology. They reached out to me and I explained that this is an academic conference aimed at expanding the production of knowledge about Hindutva, including a critical analysis of its claim to represent Hindus, Hinduism, and Indian culture,” Ludden was quoted by Al Jazeera.
“The campaign against the conference is meant to both shut down the conference and send a clear signal to all critics of Hindutva,” conference organizers told Al Jazeera in an emailed statement.
Last week, more than 50 South Asian diaspora organizations, 937 academics from across the world, including scholars of genocide and mass violence, issued a statement in support of the conference and called for an end to the Hindu right-wing attacks on academic freedom.
“The campaign of intimidation carried out by Hindutva affiliates cannot be allowed to take root in the academy in the US, Europe, or around the world. Free speech must be protected,” said the statement.
Dr. Audrey Truschke, Associate Professor of South Asian history at Rutgers University-Newark wrote a detailed thread on Twitter about the whole situation.
“We are watching as right-wing Hindu American groups harass, intimidate, and endanger academics, including students. What you're doing is beyond unacceptable. It is unethical, hate-mongering, and very, very dangerous. Stop. Now.” She wrote in one of her tweets from the thread.
She also explained how groups should react to the rise of Hindutva who are promoting intolerance in the name of Hinduism.
We are watching as right-wing Hindu American groups harass, intimidate, and endanger academics, including students.
— Dr. Audrey Truschke (@AudreyTruschke) September 5, 2021
What you're doing is beyond unacceptable. It is unethical, hate mongering, and very, very dangerous. Stop. Now. #Hindutva
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
SC rejects pleas of Anil Ambani challenging Bombay HC order on declaration of accounts as fraud
New Delhi (PTI): Observing that crores of public monies had been siphoned off, the Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed industrialist Anil Ambani's three separate pleas, challenging the Bombay High Court order that allowed the proceedings, initiated by banks against him and Reliance Communications Ltd to classify their bank accounts as fraud, to continue.
A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi permitted Ambani to pursue his plea before the high court's single judge bench against the banks' show cause notices to declare the accounts as fraud.
"Hard-earned public money to the tune of thousands of crores has been siphoned. Did you make good losses to banks and financial institutions," the bench said.
Ambani and the firm were represented by senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Shyam Divan, who said the order would lead to the "civil death" of their clients.
Refusing to interfere with the February 23 order of the Bombay High Court's division bench, the SC said, "We see no ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court (division bench). It is clarified that the observations of the Division Bench shall have no bearing in the pending suit. The (single judge bench) High Court is requested to expedite the disposal of the suit (filed by Ambani against the show cause notices issued by banks on move to declare the accounts as fraud)."
The bench requested the single judge bench to expeditiously decide Ambani's plea against the show cause notices issued by three banks.
The apex court passed the order while hearing three separate pleas filed by Ambani who had challenged a February 23 order of a division bench of the high court.
The division bench had quashed a single judge bench interim order that stayed proceedings initiated against him and Reliance Communications Ltd to classify their bank accounts as fraud.
The division bench allowed the appeals filed by three public sector banks and auditor firm BDO India LLP against the December 2025 interim order passed by a single bench.
The single judge bench order had stayed all present and future action by Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank, and Bank of Baroda, noting that the action was based on a legally flawed forensic audit and violated the Reserve Bank of India's mandatory guidelines.
Ambani challenged the show cause notices issued by Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI and Bank of Baroda before the single bench, seeking to declare his and Reliance Communications' accounts as fraudulent.
At the outset, Sibal said there was a question of law that must be decided. The bench said, "the matter pertains to siphoning of thousands of crores of public money," and any intervention at this stage would prejudice the ongoing investigation by probe agencies.
"Please go and raise all these issues before the high court … show cause notices have been issued. You have your own remedy against them...institutions have been duped crores of rupees," the CJI said, adding, "it's a case of siphoning off… We can't really express any opinion as we don't want to prejudice."
Sibal submitted that Ambani had conveyed his willingness to amicably resolve and settle all pending matters with the banks.
Earlier, the high court's division bench quashed the single bench order and termed it "illegal and perverse."
The banks had challenged a December 2025 single-bench order granting interim relief to Ambani and his company.
The order cited violations of mandatory RBI rules and a classic case of banks "waking up from deep slumber" after years.
The three banks in their appeal said the forensic audit, which led to accounts being classified as "fraud", was legally valid and based on serious findings of fund siphoning and misutilisation.
This was recorded in the report submitted by the audit firm BDO LLP, they contended.
The banks, in their plea, also said Ambani had raised a technical challenge to the forensic audit before the single bench.
Ambani, as an interim relief, sought a stay of the notices and an injunction against any coercive action on the ground that BDO LLP was not qualified to conduct the forensic audit as its signatory was not a chartered accountant.
BDO LLP is an accounting consultant firm and not an audit firm, Ambani claimed. The single bench agreed with Ambani and stayed the action by the banks.
