LUCKNOW, Uttar Pradesh : A few hours before Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed a forum of investors in the city last month, police constables surrounded Pooja Shukla as she stepped out of her friend's house in Ismailganj.

Shukla, a 23-year-old activist with the Samajwadi Party (SP), said the policemen and women dragged her to a waiting jeep, snatched her phone, drove her around the city for five hours and only let her go when she pretended to be ill. Another group from the police, she said, raided her house in Sarojini Nagar, where she lives with her parents.

"They abused me for hours inside the car," Shukla said. "They narrated how encounters are done by the police. Then they said that I have been creating problems for them and I might get into big trouble."

This wasn't Shukla's first brush with the law: images of her sparring with the police have been widely shared among university students in the city. Last year, she spent 26 days in prison after she was arrested for waving a black flag at Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath when he visited Lucknow University.

Shukla, a slight young woman with an outsized presence, is one of a cohort of student activists who have been drawn into politics by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP's) crackdown on universities. The student upsurge began in January 2016, when the suicide of Hyderabad University student Rohith Vemula triggered protests on campuses across the country.

A few months later, the arrest of Jawaharlal Nehru University students Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya—and the widespread media coverage that followed—marked the first real signs of dissent against the Modi government.

Now, as the country is preparing to go to the polls again next year, students such as Shukla are a visible part of the opposition to the BJP.

"She is aggressive and not easily intimidated," said Rahul Singh, national president of the student wing of the Samajwadi Party, explaining why the party signed her up. "She won't shut up easily and is young and idealistic."


In June 2017, when Adityanath was scheduled to visit Lucknow University to unveil a statue of Shivaji erected inside the campus, Shukla (who was not affiliated with any political party at the time) and a group of fellow students stood by the gates—reading, chatting in pairs and pretending like they were simply waiting for class.

They had stuffed black cloth flags inside their books and lunch boxes, which they whipped out the moment Adityanath's convoy rolled up.

The police quickly rounded up and thrashed the protestors. Eleven of them—nine men and two women, including Shukla—were thrown into jail the next day after a court order.

Shukla was charged with rioting, obstructing a public servant from performing his duty and intimidation of a public servant—offences punishable with imprisonment of up to five years.

The students were protesting allegations that the university had spent Rs 40 lakh getting the statute from Mumbai, where as, fees had been hiked citing lack of funds. An accountant with the university, who Shukla said was transferred immediately after, had revealed that the university spent a fortune on the statue whereas something like that could have been created by the fine arts faculty of the university itself for less than Rs 8 lakh. "The narrative and events around the unveiling of the statue was also very pro-Hindutva," Shukla said.

She spent 26 days in jail, the longest among all the detainees, and upon her release, joined the SP which had helped bail her out.


Five days after Shukla was imprisoned, her father, Rakesh, visited her in jail.

"Is this what you wanted?" he asked. "To bring shame to the family?"

Shukla, who was flush with the excitement of standing up to the government, was suddenly faced with the enormity of her political choices: her parents and her two sisters lived in a room in a small one-storey house that they shared with eight other family members, in a neighbourhood loyal to the BJP.

Rakesh, a small-time real estate agent, couldn't step out of their house without a neighbour or a local vendor stopping him to ask if it was indeed true that "Shukla ji's elder daughter was in jail."

Young men in the neighbourhood harassed her family. Her parents couldn't protest as they feared she would be incarcerated indefinitely. Her mother was in shock, and couldn't bring herself to visit her daughter in jail.

Eventually, Shukla's family was forced to move to another house after the other family members complained of the frequent visits by the police.

"My sisters were scared to step out of home alone for fear of being taunted and bullied," she recalled. "Boys made nasty passes at them. Both are younger than me—one is in school, one in college."

Shukla's foray into politics, Rakesh told HuffPost India, wasn't something her family was equipped to deal with.

"She has been to jail, police keeps coming to the house, people keep saying we can't marry her or her sisters off," he said. But, Rakesh conceded, "some Samajwadi Party leaders also told me she will do well and apparently young people look up to her."

Rakesh said he was mostly apolitical, and had occasionally voted for the Congress. But Shukla's extended family of Brahmins have traditionally endorsed BJP's politics.

"Now they are very pro-Modi," Shukla said. "So they were even more riled that I went to jail opposing the BJP."

Shukla said that her family was unhappy with her political ambitions. Her father, she said, couldn't stomach her independence like "most patriarchal men."


Purushvaadi soch, or the patriarchal mindset, surfaces frequently in conversations with Shukla. For her, it explains her father's reluctance to pay for her education because she refused to attend a college of his choice, her family's response to her arrest and the local media's coverage of political events she is involved in.

"I used to have fights with my father over things he stopped us from doing just because we were girls," she said. "It irritated me, but it was college which taught me how skewed everything was."

Men of all political stripes made women miserable at university, she said, but it was the relentless aggression of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) that riled Shukla the most.

In her first year as a student, studying commerce at the university, Shukla forced a male student to apologise for harassing her friend. Soon after, the male student and his friends harassed Shukla to the point that she stopped attending college for two months.

In November 2015, Shukla joined the All India Students' Association, the student wing of the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation, after the ABVP attacked Kavita Krishnan, at Lucknow University where she had come to address a seminar against 'love jihad'.

"Just the other day, these men were telling me that women are like deities to them and then they try to physically assault a woman," she said. Shukla left the party a year later for personal reasons.


"Shukla represents two important demographics—students and women—whose disenchantment with the BJP will be crucial for Samajwadi Party," said Sudhir Panwar, a Lucknow University professor and a member of the SP.

Shukla is aware of the difficulty of being both a feminist and an SP worker. The party's tenure in power was marked by apathy to violence against women; Mulayam Singh Yadav, the party's founder, sparked outrage in 2014 when he questioned capital punishment for rape with the assertion that "boys will be boys".

For Shukla, Akhilesh Yadav's ascent to the party leadership marks a hope that the party will change.

"When I am surrounded by all these men at work, of course I am anxious at times," she said. "A majority of them, like a majority of men in India itself, come from very gendered social structures."

Yet, the discipline of a political outfit, she hopes, will make them think differently.

For the SP, Shukla's reputation as a young, compelling, anti-BJP political figure means she can integrate diverse voices critical of the BJP and convince them to vote for the SP.

Last month, for instance, she presided over the formation of the Students' Alliance for Democratic Rights (SADR), which encompasses a group of student leaders from major UP universities such as University of Allahabad, Banaras Hindu University and Aligarh Muslim University—to campaign against the BJP. Many of the attendees have been critical of the SP in the past, but may now consider supporting the party in 2019.

Jyoti Rai, a recent graduate from the university, said she was supporting SADR because of Shukla.

"I am not sure of SP's politics, but what Pooja has been demanding makes a lot of sense. She also went to jail for making valid demands," Rai said.

Shukla has also displayed keen political instincts.

Shortly after joining the SP, she applied to the women's studies department of Lucknow University. Shukla claims the course will help her flesh out her politics, but students said it was well known that the university had said that the students who had demonstrated against Adityanath would never be granted admission again.

Shukla applied anyway, and the university published a merit list with details of the scores of all the students who had taken the entrance exam—except Shukla's.

This gave Shukla the clear evidence she needed to prove that the university administration was discriminating against those opposed to the BJP government. She went on hunger strike, and her protest garnered support from across the political spectrum.

"How could they deny admission to a student who has had first class marks throughout?" said Ramesh Dixit, a former Lucknow University professor and the state chief of the Nationalist Congress Party.

"If the university has to refuse her admission, they have to furnish proper proof—how much did she score?" said Roop Rekha Verma, another former professor. "Why are they withholding her result without an explanation?"

Academic and social scientist Nadeem Hasnain said the university's treatment of Shukla was evidence of a BJP move to shut down spaces of critical political thinking.

Shukla has turned her protest into an opportunity to demand a reform of the university admission process.

"We started a signature campaign demanding fair and transparent admission processes and I have been making the rounds of colleges in Lucknow," she said, adding she will soon be travelling to other cities and towns in UP. "Protests often scare people off, so now I am trying to organise talks with academics like Ramesh sir and Roop Rekha ma'am, so that students understand what we are saying."

Shukla says she doesn't want an election ticket from the party anytime soon, but Panwar said that SP has always given preference to student leaders.

"There are several party people, especially in the upper house, who have made a name for themselves as student leaders," he said.

Delhi versus UP

"There's a world of difference in being a woman or an activist in Delhi and being a politically active woman in Uttar Pradesh," Shukla told HuffPost India.

Students from other states, even politically significant ones like Uttar Pradesh, don't get the kind of public support that students from JNU do. Shukla, who has less than 2000 followers on Twitter, says she isn't "good at protesting on Twitter." Rapes threats on Twitter are one thing, she said, but in UP men often end arguments by saying utha lenge—we'll abduct you.

"Someone goes to jail for protesting at JNU, it's all over people's social media and front pages of newspapers," Shukla said. "I spent almost a month in jail, did you come across anything on me on Facebook?"

courtesy :

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.

Bengaluru, Jul 22: Karnataka Labour Minister Santosh Lad on Monday said the proposal to extend the working hours of employees in the IT/ITeS/BPO sector has come from the IT industry, and the government will take a decision after looking into opinions shared by all stakeholders including leaders in the field and employees.

Stating that the IT employees union has expressed their dissent, he urged industry veterans and captains to also come out and share their views.

The proposed 'Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments (Amendment) Bill 2024' seeks to normalise a 14-hour work day. The existing act only allows a maximum of 10 hours work per day including overtime.

"It is not the Minister who has brought himself (the proposed bill). The industry is pressurising. (They) are asking and they want it. Since there is pressure from the industry, the bill has come to us. We are still evaluating it at the Labour department. The question is for all the heads of the industry to discuss this," Lad said.

ALSO READ: Bengaluru IT sector to face 14-hour work day? Employees' Union expresses opposition

Speaking to reporters here, he said: "The matter is in open domain, people are free to discuss this. They (industry leaders) express (opinion) for every thing, so I want all the big heads (of the industry) to debate and express their view. There is dissent from IT employees. I want people to have their opinion. Based on that as a department we will look into what has to be done."

Karnataka State IT/ITeS Employees' Union (KITU) that has urged the Siddaramaiah-led government to reconsider the plans to extend the working hours, strongly opposing the proposed amendment which, it said, poses an "attack on the basic right of any worker to have a personal life."

This amendment will allow the companies to go for a two shift system instead of the currently existing three shift system, and one third of the workforce will be thrown out from their employment, it claimed.

To a question on the impact of this proposed extended workers on the health, social and personal life of the employees, the Minister said: "Let the IT heads, the so-called big heads of the country, discuss. For everything they come out. I want the IT heads, IT company owners, Directors -- let them come and share their opinion, whether it is required or not.

The dissent is coming from the union, let the IT industry people, the heads have to speak about it positive or negative, and the government will look into what has to be done."

The IT industry is pressuring the government to go ahead with the proposal, he said. "Without their consent why would we do it suo moto. It is not done by any department, nor by the IT Minister. The pressure is from the IT industry itself, and that's how the proposal has come to us."

Asked as to why the government cannot say that they will not act on the proposal, considering the adverse impact it will have on the employees, the Minister said: "the government has done nothing. The proposal has come from the IT industry, it is good that it is in the public domain, definitely the government and my department in its wisdom will definitely take a call, but let people give their opinion."

Suhas Adiga, General Secretary of the Karnataka State IT/ITeS Employees Union, citing various reports regarding health implication of this proposed move, said as per the current understanding the employees might have to work 80-85 hours in a week.

"This cannot be accepted under any circumstances. We call upon all IT/ITeS Employees and their dependents or family members to come out and resist this," he added.

Targeting the government on the issue, state BJP President B Y Vijayendra said the Congress government in Karnataka has not only made a mockery of themselves but is "leaving no stone unturned to destroy everything in its way."

"While the Siddaramaiah govt itself is in a sleeping mode, it plans to propose a bill that will force the IT sector to work 14 Work Hours A Day, 70 A Week," he posted on 'X'.

"The Congress government (should) better worry about its own under-performing productivity, the collapsing state economy and degrading infrastructure before setting policies for a sector that's efficient & thriving," Vijayendra added.

Get all the latest, breaking news from Karnataka in a single click. CLICK HERE to get all the latest news from Karnataka.