Rampant encroaching of public property by religious institutions, corporate houses, private entities and other powers has been a major issue in all fast growing cities. Bengaluru is no exception. One particular case of encroachment of public land in erstwhile Bharatinagar constituency (currently, Sarvagnanagar) was resolved only last year.

The land in question measures Four acres, 3 guntas on CTS No.1378 which houses the Indian Gyamkhana Club. The Club has been sitting on this land since its establishment in 1932 during the erstwhile British Raj period. This land of Four acres, 3 guntas were leased to the Club in 1932 by the then City Municipality for a period of 5 years. Subsequently the lease was renewed by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) in the years 1937, 1954, 1969, 1978, 1994 and 2008.

In 1994, the BBMP attempted to reduce the lease area to 1acre 8 guntas and restore the rest for civic and public purposes. However, the State Government, directed the BBMP to lease the entire land to the Club for 35 years for an annual fee of Rs. 2,800 per square feet. for every acre up to 2008.

In 2008, upon the termination of the lease, the Ho’ble Supreme Court held that 1 acre 8 guntas be leased to Indian Gymkhana at the rate of Rs.2,800/- per sq.ft. and the remaining land be used for Community Sports and Public Use.

However, in 2010, the government directed Indian Gymkhana to pay a lease amount of Rs.60,000/- for every acre of leased land of 4 acres 21 guntas and the lease to be renewed once in 3 years at 15% for a period of 35 years

It was then that Vidhana Sabha Member and x-MLA of Bharatinagar constituency, N Rajanna questioned the above order of the Government stating that it was against the 2008 guidelines of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and submitted a complaint in 2014 to Hon’ble Lokayukata to conduct an enquiry. Hon’ble Lokayukta sought the opinion of the Law Department of whether the Government had the authority to lease out public property to private entities.

It was found that the Government did not have the authority to lease away property of the Corporation for a lesser rent. Accordingly, a report was submitted by Upa Lokayukta to withdraw the Government order.

Rajanna further submitted in 2014 that the property leased to Indian Gymkhana is worth several crores and the land should be used for public use and for children’s ground.

In 2015, the Government order leased 1 acre 8 guntas to Indian Gymkhana at Rs.2,800/- per sq.ft. and for an yearly lease of Rs.1,46,36,160/-.

Questioning the Government Order of 2015 and the order of the Upa Lokayukta of 2014 and letter dated 2014, Indian Gymkhana filed in writ in WP No. 45070/2015 wherein the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka directed the Government to reconsider the matter. However, the learned AAG submitted that the matter will be heard by Additional Chief Secretary, Urban Development Department on 3/10/2016.

IN April 2017, Additional Chief Secretary, Urban Development Department proposed a resolution wherein it was held that the lease shall be fixed for the portion where the old club is situated and facilities situated with prior approval of BBMP and such areas needed for reasonable usage of the above structures. The balance area shall be used as playground for public and Club Association among others.

Indian Gymkhana filed a writ in WP No 21179/2017 questioning the above order which was dismissed by Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka on 31/8/2018

Finally in 2022 the Government vide GO order: NaAaEe 152 MNG 2014 stated that out of 4 acres 21 guntas, 3 acres 13 guntas will be used for children’s park and public use. 1 acre 8 guntas is to be leased to Indian Gymkhana Club. And stated that the Club will have to have pay the amount due since 2008 at Rs. 5,99,53,31,544.66 for unauthroised usage of 3 acres 13 guntas and Rs. 2,16,37,28,677.77 towards lease amount and interest for usage of 1 acre 8 guntas to BBMP. Further, the lease amount for 2020-21 shall be decided by BBMP and BBMP shall take possession of the balance land measuring 3 acres 13 guntas.

Since then, the BBMP took back 3 acres 13 guntas and is maintaining it as a playground for the public.

 

Girish Linganna 

Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.



New York, Apr 7 (PTI): The US Supreme Court has rejected 26/11 Mumbai terror attack accused Tahawwur Rana's appeal seeking a stay on his extradition to India, moving him closer to being handed over to Indian authorities to face justice.

Rana, 64, a Canadian national of Pakistani origin, is currently lodged at a metropolitan detention centre in Los Angeles.

He is known to be associated with Pakistani-American terrorist David Coleman Headley, one of the main conspirators of the 26/11 attacks. Headley conducted a recce of Mumbai before the attacks by posing as an employee of Rana’s immigration consultancy.

Rana had submitted an ‘Emergency Application For Stay Pending Litigation of Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus' on February 27, 2025, with Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States and Circuit Justice for the Ninth Circuit Elena Kagan.

Kagan had denied the application earlier last month.

Rana had then renewed his ‘Emergency Application for Stay Pending Litigation of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus previously addressed to Justice Kagan’, and requested that the renewed application be directed to US Chief Justice John Roberts.

An order on the Supreme Court website noted that Rana's renewed application had been “distributed for Conference” on April 4 and the “application” has been “referred to the Court.”

A notice on the Supreme Court website Monday said that “Application denied by the Court.”

Rana was convicted in the US of one count of conspiracy to provide material support to the terrorist plot in Denmark and one count of providing material support to Pakistan-based terrorist organisation Lashker-e-Taiba which was responsible for the attacks in Mumbai.

New York-based Indian-American attorney Ravi Batra had told PTI that Rana had made his application to the Supreme Court to prevent extradition, which Justice Kagan denied on March 6. The application was then submitted before Roberts, “who has shared it with the Court to conference so as to harness the entire Court’s view.”

The Supreme Court justices are Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

In his emergency application, Rana had sought a stay of his extradition and surrender to India pending litigation (including exhaustion of all appeals) on the merits of his February 13.

In that petition, Rana argued that his extradition to India violates US law and the UN Convention Against Torture "because there are substantial grounds for believing that, if extradited to India, the petitioner will be in danger of being subjected to torture."

"The likelihood of torture in this case is even higher though as petitioner faces acute risk as a Muslim of Pakistani origin charged in the Mumbai attacks,” the application said.

The application also said that his “severe medical conditions” render extradition to Indian detention facilities a “de facto" death sentence in this case.

The US Supreme Court denied Rana's petition for a writ of certiorari relating to his original habeas petition on January 21. The application notes that on that same day, newly-confirmed Secretary of State Marco Rubio had met with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar.

When Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Washington on February 12 to meet with Trump, Rana’s counsel received a letter from the Department of State, stating that “on February 11, 2025, the Secretary of State decided to authorise” Rana’s "surrender to India,” pursuant to the “Extradition Treaty between the United States and India”.

Rana’s Counsel requested from the State Department the complete administrative record on which Secretary Rubio based his decision to authorize Rana’s surrender to India.

The Counsel also requested immediate information of any commitment the United States has obtained from India with respect to Rana’s treatment. “The government declined to provide any information in response to these requests,” the application said.

It added that given Rana’s underlying health conditions and the State Department’s findings regarding the treatment of prisoners, it is very likely “Rana will not survive long enough to be tried in India".

During a joint press conference with Prime Minister Modi in the White House in February, President Donald Trump announced that his administration has approved the extradition of "very evil" Rana, wanted by Indian law enforcement agencies for his role in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, "to face justice in India”.

A total of 166 people, including six Americans, were killed in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks in which 10 Pakistani terrorists laid a more than 60-hour siege, attacking and killing people at iconic and vital locations in Mumbai.