Federation infighting, court battles and 2 new world champions: Indian boxing's conflicted year
New Delhi (PTI): Indian boxing endured a deeply unsettling 2025 with the administrators locked in bitter courtroom battles before the men and women who actually exchange blows for a living salvaged the year through the emergence of two new world champions in Jaismine Lamboria and Minakshi Hooda.
The year began on an unusually dull note with boxers absent from most international competition in the aftermath of a medal-less Olympic campaign.
Behind the quiet, however, the sport was being consumed by internal strife within the Boxing Federation of India (BFI).
ALSO READ: Mirabai carries Indian weightlifting as juniors rise but doping woes persist in 2025
Selection plans were stalled, national championships were disrupted, national coaching positions lay vacant and overseas exposure took a hit as rival camps within the federation locked horns, leaving athletes caught in the crossfire.
Election chaos and court battles
The crisis centred on the BFI elections, which was due before February 3 but ended up repeatedly delayed.
This also prompted the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) to appoint an ad-hoc committee to run the federation. The move was termed illegal by the BFI and was later stayed by the Delhi High Court.
Soon allegations of abuse of power, financial misconduct and relentless turf wars inside the federation surfaced.
The Ajay Singh-led BFI suspended secretary general Hemanta Kalita and treasurer Digvijay Singh over alleged financial irregularities, triggering legal challenges.
Amid the turmoil, former sports minister Anurag Thakur was backed to challenge Singh for the president's post, but his candidature was rejected after a controversial March 7 directive, issued by Singh, that ruled him ineligible for the electoral college.
Thakur's faction -- the Himachal Pradesh Boxing Association -- approached the courts as did the Delhi unit, whose chief's name was omitted from the electoral college on similar ground.
Both challenged the legitimacy of the directive.
What followed was a prolonged and ugly power struggle. The mud-slinging reached such a point that even the Returning Officer resigned, citing a smear campaign against him.
The turmoil had direct consequences on the boxers. The senior women's National Championships, which were to be held in November 2024, were repeatedly postponed.
They were eventually held under a cloud of controversy in March. Several state units, including that of Madhya Pradesh and Assam, barred their boxers from participating.
The tussle forced Tokyo Olympics bronze-medallist Lovlina Borgohain, who hails from Assam, to withdraw her name.
World Boxing, the sport's global governing body, stepped in to form an interim committee, appointing Singh as chief, to oversee the BFI's affairs as the elections continued to be delayed due to legal wrangling.
Under the World body's order, the interim committee amended the BFI constitution and the March 7 directive was made a clause, prompting rival factions to once again seek judicial intervention.
The deadlock broke in August when Singh was re-elected BFI president for a third consecutive term despite ongoing legal cases.
But both the IOA and the Sports Ministry refused to send observers for the election, raising questions over its legitimacy.
Even after the new body was elected, dissent has simmered. Some state units claim to have moved a no-confidence motion against Singh, challenging the validity of the amended constitution.
Singh dismissed the claims, stating that several of the same members had also signed documents reaffirming their confidence in him.
Two new world champions
Once the focus returned to competition, Indian boxers found their feet in the ring.
New national coaches were appointed -- Dharmender Yadav for the men's team and D Chandralal for the women's side.
The Indian contingent returned with respectable results from the Brazil and Kazakhstan legs of the World Boxing Cup.
However, participation across the events was limited as World Boxing, having secured IOC recognition only earlier in the year, worked on setting an international calendar.
The standout moment of the year came at the World Championships in Liverpool, where Jaismine (57kg) and Minakshi (48kg) clinched gold medals.
Pooja Rani (80kg) and Nupur Sheoran (80+kg) added to the glory with a bronze and silver respectively, reaffirming India's growing strength in women's boxing.
The picture was not entirely rosy though.
Established stars like Nikhat Zareen, who returned after a long injury lay off, and Borgohain failed to deliver the performances that were expected of them.
It is also worth noting that, barring Jaismine's title, the other podium finishes came in non-Olympic weight categories, where the competitive field was comparatively thinner.
In Jaismine, however, India appears to have found a boxer with a genuine shot at Olympic glory in 2028.
Consistent across the season, she defeated Paris Olympics silver-medallist Julia Szeremeta of Poland in the Worlds' final.
The men, on the other hand, endured a humbling low at the Worlds, returning without a single medal for the first time in 12 years.
But there were signs of promise.
Youngster Abhinash Jamwal showed he could thrive at the elite level after stepping out of Shiva Thapa's shadow, while Sachin Siwach and Pawan Bartwal also displayed potential.
India hosted the much-hyped season-ending World Cup finals where the hosts enjoyed overwhelming success, finishing with a record haul of 20 medals, including nine gold.
But it was not reflective of a great performance as the draws were thin, the top ranked boxers skipped the tournament while in heavyweight categories podiums were awarded just for participation.
Soon after the event, the return of former high-performance director Santiago Nieva, this time as women's team head coach, was announced, marking the start of an interesting new chapter.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Kannur dental student death: Case registered against loan app operators, parents allege murder
Kannur (PTI): A case has been registered against unidentified loan app operators in connection with the death of a Kannur Dental College student in Anjarakandy, officials said on Monday.
However, the victim’s parents alleged that their son was murdered and held the college faculty responsible for his death.
The Kannur Cyber Police registered the case on Sunday night based on a complaint by an assistant professor of the college.
According to police, Nithin Raj R L, a first-year BDS student, had taken a loan through an online loan app.
After he defaulted on repayment, the app operators allegedly began contacting the assistant professor.
The FIR stated that the accused contacted the woman faculty member via MMS and WhatsApp, threatening her over repayment and attempting to siphon off money illegally.
Sources said that in cases of default, such loan app operators often send messages to all available contacts of the borrower.
Raj (22), a native of Uzhamalackal, Puthukulangara in Thiruvananthapuram district, was found critically injured near the medical college block after falling from a building on April 10 and later succumbed to his injuries.
The family alleged that Raj was subjected to emotional harassment on caste and complexion grounds by two faculty members, following which a case was registered against Dental Anatomy Department Head M K Ram and Associate Professor K T Sangeetha Nambiar for abetment of suicide and under provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Even though notices were issued to both accused to appear for interrogation, they are yet to respond to the police, officials said.
Police officials said the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the case is also examining whether Raj’s death was linked to threats from the loan app operators.
The cyber case has been registered under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including Sections 351(2) (criminal intimidation) and 308(3) (extortion), along with Section 66D of the Information Technology Act (cheating by personation using computer resources).
Police said Raj’s mobile phone will be examined to gather details about the loan app, and a detailed statement will be recorded from the assistant professor who received the threatening messages and calls.
Meanwhile, the SIT has recovered chat details from Raj’s phone, which indicate that he had sought more time to repay the loan.
According to police, Raj had taken a loan of Rs 14,000, and the app operators had demanded immediate repayment of Rs 8,000.
As his family was facing financial difficulties, he had requested a few weeks’ time to settle the dues.
The SIT, led by the Station House Officer of Chakkarakkallu police station, visited Raj’s house on Monday and recorded statements of his parents and sister.
The four-member team also collected digital evidence from them.
The family also met the State Police Chief Ravada Chandrasekhar and filed a petition seeking a detailed probe into the incident.
Raj’s father Rajan said his son had taken the loan for his mother’s treatment.
“We were repaying it. But recently, the repayment defaulted. If the teacher was aggrieved by the loan app’s calls and my son had done anything wrong, they should have informed us. You can check my phone, there is no call from the college,” he said.
Rajan said he had little hope of getting justice.
“They all killed my son. What justice can I expect? I worked hard for his education. We lost everything,” he said.
He also alleged that even three days after Raj’s death, there had been no communication from the college authorities.
“He was a student of that college. Not even a word from the authorities. Students there, fearing for their future, are not speaking out. At least one student should speak out for us,” he said.
Meanwhile, protests erupted at Kannur Dental College on Monday, with final-year BDS students also joining the agitation.
The college has granted leave to students of other batches following the incident.
Students alleged that the accused faculty member, M K Ram, misbehaved with students by body-shaming and physical assault.
“We were living under severe pressure. Ram was involved in body-shaming. Verbal abuse was frequent. Apart from it, he used to hit students on the head. There were also complaints against him and disciplinary action taken earlier,” a student told reporters.
Political organisations, including KSU of the Congress, SFI and DYFI of the CPI(M), MSF of the IUML and ABVP of the BJP, carried out protest marches.
KSU and SFI activists who entered the college compound were later detained and removed by police.
Kerala SC/ST Commission Chairperson Shekaran Miniyodan visited Raj’s house and interacted with his family.
He said the Commission has registered a case and sought a report from the police.
“We will collect information along with the SIT about the incident. Apart from the preliminary investigation report, we will also examine the postmortem report,” he said.
Similarly, the Kerala Youth Commission has also registered a case and recorded statements of students of the college.
Commission Chairman M Shajar said students have raised serious allegations against M K Ram and that a detailed probe would be conducted with police support.
Earlier, the Kerala State Human Rights Commission had also registered a case and sought a report from the police.
_vb_94.jpeg)