ICC recommends six-team T20 events for 2028 Olympics, final decision in October
New Delhi, Jan 21: The International Cricket Council is still hopeful of the sport's inclusion in Los Angeles 2028 Olympics and has "recommended" six-team T20 events for both men and women to the Games' organising committee.
A final decision on the inclusion of cricket will be taken by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) around October after the organisers finalise the list of new sports by March, stated a report in ESPNCricinfo.
These will then be ratified at the IOC's session in Mumbai, which is expected to take place around October this year, it added.
In a strategic move, BCCI secretary Jay Shah has been added to the ICC's Olympics working group headed by ICC chairman Greg Barclay, and which also includes Indra Nooyi (independent director) and Paraag Marathe (former USA Cricket president).
Shah was included "keeping in mind India's ambition" to host the Olympics in 2036.
"And the ICC believes Shah's involvement could lend an important and potentially influential push in its negotiations with the IOC for cricket to be included at sport's biggest global event," the report said.
The proposal for a six-team event was made to ensure a more cost efficient Olympics which is part of their Olympic Agenda, it added.
Cricket along with eight other sports -- baseball/softball, flag football, lacrosse, break dancing, karate, kickboxing, squash and motorsport -- are competing to make the LA 28 roster.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
UP cop mistakes judge for theft accused, searches her home in shocking blunder
New Delhi: In a startling case of police negligence, a sub-inspector in Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh, wrongly identified a sitting judicial officer as a proclaimed offender and searched her residence, triggering outrage within the judiciary and immediate disciplinary action.
The officer, Sub-Inspector Banwarilal, was executing a proclamation order under Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) against an absconding theft accused, Rajkumar alias Pappu. However, in a major lapse, he mistook Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagma Khan—the very judge who had issued the order—for the accused.
Rajkumar had been evading arrest in connection with a 2012 theft case registered at Thana North Police Station. After repeated non-bailable warrants failed to secure his presence, Magistrate Khan ordered proceedings to declare him a proclaimed offender.
Instead of acting on the correct details, SI Banwarilal submitted a report to the court mislabeling the proclamation as a non-bailable warrant and erroneously listing Judge Khan’s name as the accused. He further claimed she was untraceable at her residence, prompting the court's alarm.
The error came to light during a court hearing on March 23. A visibly shocked Magistrate Khan denounced the sub-inspector's conduct as a “patent and grave error,” citing his failure to read and understand the judicial order.
“It is quite bizarre that the serving officer of the concerned Police Station has little to no idea of what was sent by this court, who exactly sent it, and against whom,” she remarked, adding that such negligence poses serious threats to the fundamental rights of individuals and public confidence in the justice system.
The court further warned that unchecked carelessness by law enforcement officers could result in arbitrary actions and the misuse of power. “If such negligent police officials are made free to serve processes in such a blind form, escaping the consequences of their wrongs, they will run amok,” the court observed.
Copies of the court’s order were sent to senior police authorities, including the Inspector General of Police (Agra Range), the Director General of Police (Uttar Pradesh), and the Superintendent of Police (Firozabad), recommending a formal inquiry and disciplinary action.
Acting on the court’s directive, Firozabad SSP Saurabh Dixit suspended Sub-Inspector Banwarilal with immediate effect, pending further investigation. The matter will next be heard on April 26, 2025.
_vb_55.jpeg)
_vb_40.jpeg)