India loses to Iraq in shootout after conceding debatable penalty
Chiang Mai (Thailand) (PTI) A Sunil Chhetri-less India conceded a late goal off a debatable penalty to miss out on their first ever win over higher-ranked Iraq, who won the King's Cup semifinal clash via penalty shootout here on Thursday.
India will take on Lebanon in the bronze-medal playoff, which will be followed by the summit clash between Iraq and Thailand on Sunday.
In the other semifinal at the 700th Anniversary Stadium, Thailand defeated Lebanon 2-1.
India were leading 2-1 till the 79th minute when the referee awarded a soft penalty to Iraq after their striker Aymen Ghadhban was squeezed by two defenders inside the box during a tussle to get on to a high cross.
It did not look like a clear-cut penalty but Ghadhban himself stepped up to take the kick from the spot and scored to level the match 2-2 and take it to the penalty shootout.
Iraq then won 5-4 in the shootout with Brandon Fernandez failing to score as his kick hit the post and went out.
The defeat marked the end of India's impressive unbeaten streak of 12 matches, as they suffered their first loss of the year.
It was a creditable show by the Indian team, which was without their talismanic striker and captain Chhetri, who missed the tournament after becoming a father recently.
India played on equal terms against Iraq, ranked 70th in the FIFA chart (as against their 99th), for most part of the match.
Earlier, Mahesh Naorem gave India the lead in the 16th minute before Karim Ali equalised in the 28th minute, also from a penalty goal.
India took the lead in the 51st minute with Iraq captain and goalkeeper Jalal Hasan conceding an own goal.
Iraq were reduced to 10 men in the injury stoppage time as Zidane Iqbal was sent off for elbowing Brandon but India could not capitalise on that as the regulation time ended within a minute after that.
The early stages of the match showcased India's determination to make history. Naorem ignited the Indian fans' hopes when he found the back of the net, exploiting a sublime pass from Sahal Abdul Samad.
It was a moment of brilliance as Naorem deceived goalkeeper Jalal Hasan and slotted the ball past him at the near post.
However, Iraq swiftly responded, drawing level from the penalty spot.
Ali calmly converted the spot-kick after Sandesh Jhingan was penalised for a handball.
Iraq continued to press and came close to taking the lead, only to be thwarted by India's vigilant goalkeeper Gurpreet Singh Sandhu.
The second half began with a twist that favoured India.
A rare mistake by Iraq's goalkeeper Hasan gifted India the lead.
Akash Mishra sent in a low and powerful cross, which was mishandled by Hasan and the ball trickled into the net.
With India ahead 2-1, they shifted their focus to defence, putting up a resolute barrier that denied Iraq much room to manoeuvre.
However, a second penalty for Iraq in the 80th minute breathed life into the contest.
Aymen Ghadhban earned the spot-kick after an aerial duel with Nikhil Poojary and Jhingan.
Ghadhban converted, levelling the score once again. India's defence held firm despite Iraq's late offensive surge.
The injury time saw Iraq being reduced to 10 men as Zidane Iqbal received a red card for a reckless challenge on Brandon.
But there was hardly any time for India to take advantage as the match went into a nerve-wracking penalty shootout.
The shootout was a test of nerves, but it ultimately favoured Iraq, who converted all their penalties to secure a spot in the final.
Brandon's missed penalty was a rare blemish in an otherwise outstanding performance by the Indian team.
Before Thursday's game, India had played Iraq seven times with the latter winning six times, while one game had ended in a draw.
The teams last played an international friendly in November 2010 where Iraq won 2-0.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
K'taka Cong to protest against replacing MGNREGA, 'hate politics' in National Herald case
Belagavi (Karnataka) (PTI): Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar on Tuesday said that the ruling Congress in the state will hold protests against the central government's move to replace the existing rural employment law MGNREGA, and the alleged "hate politics" against the party leadership in the National Herald case on December 17.
The state Congress president said that the protest led by him and CM Siddaramaiah will be held in front of Gandhi state at Suvarna Vidhana Soudha here on Wednesday, and similar protests will also be held at all district and taluka centres of the state.
The party also plans to raise the issues in the state legislature here.
"The agitation has become necessary. Tomorrow at 9.30 am, the chief minister, myself, all ministers, MLAs and MLCs will stage a protest in front of the Gandhi statue. Everyone will participate," Shivakumar said.
Speaking to reporters here, he said the protests will also be held in all district and taluk centres including Bengaluru, and there is also a plan for a programme on Saturday, details of which will be shared later.
"In Assembly too there is a need to discuss this and for it to go into records, we are making preparations for it....the protest is against removing Mahatma Gandhi's name from MGNREGA, and against the hate politics towards Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Congress leaders," he added.
The Congress' move, came as the Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB-G RAM G) Bill, 2025, that seeks to replace the existing rural employment law MGNREGA, was introduced in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday amid strong objections by the opposition to the "removal" of Mahatma Gandhi's name from it.
Also, a court in Delhi on Tuesday refused to take cognisance of the Enforcement Directorate's money laundering charge against Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, and five others in the National Herald case.
Alleging that Congress leaders, including Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi were "harassed" in connection with the National Herald case, Shivakumar said several people, including him, had given funds to help the party related organisation, and they too were being troubled.
"My brother D K Suresh (former MP) and I were supposed to appear before the Delhi police in connection with the National Herald case. We had written a letter to them seeking a FIR copy. Chargesheet was filed by ED in the case without an FIR," he claimed.
Pointing to the Delhi Court's decision, the Deputy CM said, "This is proof that the legal system in the country is still alive. This also proves that the power is being misused (by those in the central government) to harass political opponents."
Highlighting that former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru started the National Herald in 1937, and that it is Congress' property, Shivakumar, questioning the validity of the ED case, said, "As Congress presidents (in past) Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi had their shares, it was not their own. Similarly, if we as Congress workers don't donate to the party organisation, who else will?"
Shivakumar also said that the move to rename MNREGA is with an intention to "insult" Gandhi and to weaken the scheme by reducing its funding.
