'Marks new beginning in Indian football': SC approves AIFF constitution with changes
New Delhi (PTI): The Supreme Court on Friday approved the draft constitution of All India Football Federation (AIFF) with certain changes as it asked for its adoption by the federation within four weeks.
The top court called it a “new beginning for Indian football" which is set take the "sport to greater heights".
The top court directed the national football body to call for a special general body meeting to adopt the draft constitution prepared by its former judge L Nageswara Rao.
“We have approved the provisions of the constitution in the said terms. We direct the AIFF administration to call for a special general body meeting and adopt the draft constitution with the modifications in this judgment. This shall be done at the earliest, preferably within four weeks,” a bench of Justices P S Narasimha and Joymalya Bagchi said.
The 78-page verdict authored by Justice Narasimha dealt with 12 issues, such as membership, its suspension, age bar, conflict of interest pertaining to AIFF and state football associations.
The top court said the draft constitution will be applicable to the state associations as well despite their resistance.
The top court said “the inclusion of eminent players, coaches, referees, and club representatives in the general body, with only further good governance, heralds transparency and fair play”.
The bench said it was not appropriate to have continuous monitoring of a sports federation by any forum, including the Supreme Court.
“Having taken up the matter and ensured that the Constitution is brought to this stage, it is necessary to take it to its logical end. Our monitoring will only be that far and no further,” it said.
The top court also refused to interfere with the tenure of the current executive committee of the AIFF headed by the president Kalyan Chaubey and said they were elected for a term of four years, their term will expire in 2026, which means that the current executive committee will continue only till September 2026, which is less than a year from today.
“The current executive committee can be treated as a permanent body which shall discharge its function in accordance with the relevant laws as well as the AIFF constitution,” it said.
Dealing with the contentious issue of applicability of AIFF constitution to state associations, the bench said it was important that all the constituent units and associations lower in hierarchy observed the pyramidical structure of Indian football.
They must therefore implement the same level of discipline, fairness, transparency, and good governance quotients applied at the very top, it added.
“In view of the FIFA statute, the relevant comments of Justice L N Rao and on analysis of the far-reaching implications of this provision, we are not inclined to accept the argument that the AIFF Constitution ought not be extended to the state associations and local bodies,” the bench said.
The top court modified the criteria for "eminent player" who is the member of the executive committee of the AIFF and said he should a past player, who has been retired for at least two years, and has represented India (senior) in at least seven competitive matches (men)/three competitive matches (women) sanctioned by FIFA/AFC.
"It will be reasonable to reduce the criteria suggested by Justice L N Rao, to five matches for men and from two matches for women. We hope that such a modification will ensure a wider pool and participation by retired players who will prove themselves to be efficient administrators and guiding lights for Indian football,” the bench said.
The bench further said the term "office bearers" must be understood in the context of the functioning of the AIFF and the reform that needs to be brought about.
“This definition will have a direct bearing on the applicability of cooling-off, the term, tenure and age limit. On the other hand, the inclusive definition will be consistent with the reforms that have been introduced and applied as independent measures for the vibrant working of the federation…” it said.
The top court accepted the suggestion of AIFF to increase the number of vice presidents to three including a woman and said, “Such an amendment will enable women’s representation and, at the same time, confine the number of the executive committee to fifteen members."
On the issue of disqualification, the verdict included aspects such as criminal charges and conviction of members of AIFF and state associations as it accepted the norms applied in the case related to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).
The bench modified the provision of disqualification based on framing of charge to the standard as envisaged in the judgement of BCCI -- “conviction followed by a sentence of imprisonment”.
The top court said if a public servant had necessary approval of the government, then there should not be a problem for them to become a member of the football body.
Several other modifications were also made in the draft constitution in consonance with the national sports code.
Let the Truth be known. If you read VB and like VB, please be a VB Supporter and Help us deliver the Truth to one and all.
Cong says LoPs not invited to Putin banquet, takes swipe at Tharoor for accepting invite
New Delhi (PTI): The Congress on Friday said Leaders of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi have not been invited to the banquet for Russian President Vladimir Putin, and took a swipe at its own MP Shashi Tharoor for accepting the invite.
Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said, "There has been speculation whether the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and the Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha have been invited for tonight's official dinner in honour of President Putin. The two LoPs have not been invited."
Congress' media and publicity department head Pawan Khera accused the government of breaking protocols daily and not believing in democratic principles.
"There is no invite to both the LoPs, Mr (Mallikarjun) Kharge and Mr (Rahul) Gandhi. This comes as a surprise but I don't think we should be surprised. This government is known to be breaching all protocols. What else to say, ask the government," he told PTI Videos on the sidelines of an event.
Asked about party MP Tharoor getting invited to the banquet and accepting the invitation, Khera said, "Ask Mr. Tharoor. All of us who are in the party, if our leaders don't get invited and we get invited, we need to question our own conscience and listen to our conscience. Politics has been played in inviting or not inviting people, which in itself is questionable and those who accept such an invite is also questionable," Khera said.
"We would have listened to our voice of conscience," he added.
Earlier, Tharoor said there was a time when the chairman of the external affairs committee was routinely invited but that practice seems to have stopped from some years.
"It has been resumed ...I have been invited, yes. I will definitely go," the chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs said.
On the LoPs reportedly not getting an invite, Tharoor said, "I don't know on what basis invitations were sent. I think the custom that usually used to be followed was for a wide representation. Certainly, I remember in the olden days, they used to invite not only the LoPs, (but) various other cross section of representatives of different parties. It conveys a good impression."
"I dont know the basis (of invitation), this is all done by the government, by the protocol by the Rashtrapati Bhawan, what do I know. All I can say I have honoured to have been invited. Of course I will go," Tharoor told reporters in the Parliament House complex.
Gandhi on Thursday had alleged that the government tells visiting foreign dignitaries not to meet the Leader of the Opposition due to its "insecurity".
His remarks had come hours ahead of Putin's two-day visit to India.
Gandhi had said it is a tradition that visiting foreign dignitaries meet the LoP but Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Ministry of External Affairs were not following this norm.
"Normally the tradition is that those who come from abroad have a meeting with the LoP. This used to happen during (Atal Bihari) Vajpayee ji's time, Manmohan Singh ji's time, it has been a tradition but what happens these days is that when foreign dignitaries come and when I go abroad, the government suggests to them to not meet the LoP," Gandhi had told reporters in Parliament House complex.
_vb_09.jpeg)
